I'm confused over the push for "expanded background checks" at gun shows, online, etc. I live in Vermont. Whenever I buy a firearm from a dealer I have to fill out the form and wait on an NICS background check. If I go to a dealer in a neighboring state, same thing.
If I buy a handgun from a dealer outside Vermont, it has to be shipped to a Vermont FFL who then does my NICS check.
If I buy a firearm through an internet transaction, dealer or personal, that firearm can only be legally shipped interstate to an FFL who then does my NICS check.
If I buy a firearm from a dealer at a gun show, he does the NICS check.
The only apparent "hole" in this system is a face-to-face private sale. I have spent lots of time trying to find some dependable data and it doesn't appear to exist about firearms from these private sales being used in mass murders, school shootings, shooting of law enforcement officials, etc. I must admit to being pro-gun and therefore biased, but where is the problem that expanded background checks are supposed to fix?
If I buy a handgun from a dealer outside Vermont, it has to be shipped to a Vermont FFL who then does my NICS check.
If I buy a firearm through an internet transaction, dealer or personal, that firearm can only be legally shipped interstate to an FFL who then does my NICS check.
If I buy a firearm from a dealer at a gun show, he does the NICS check.
The only apparent "hole" in this system is a face-to-face private sale. I have spent lots of time trying to find some dependable data and it doesn't appear to exist about firearms from these private sales being used in mass murders, school shootings, shooting of law enforcement officials, etc. I must admit to being pro-gun and therefore biased, but where is the problem that expanded background checks are supposed to fix?