Lapua40X
California Hunter Education Instructor
Working on a new load today and learned how a wide range of variables can remain relatively constant while fine tuning just one can make a great deal of difference.
My loads (6BR Norma 107 gr Sierra MK in turned neck cases with about .001 neck tension) were set at 28 gr. Varget. The single change I made for today's tests was seating depth.
My chamber measures 1.812 to the lands. With the OAL at the ogive set with clearances of:
.024 to the lands I recorded MV ES 14 with an average of 2613 fps and a group dispersion of .747
.017 to the lands I recorded MV ES 22 with an average of 2616 fps and a group dispersion of .507
.012 to the lands I recorded MV ES 18 with an average of 2621 fps and a group dispersion of .314
The linearity of the results surprised me and, I think, lends credence to the things I've learned from the experienced guys in this forum. Wanted to offer my thanks for their contributions
My loads (6BR Norma 107 gr Sierra MK in turned neck cases with about .001 neck tension) were set at 28 gr. Varget. The single change I made for today's tests was seating depth.
My chamber measures 1.812 to the lands. With the OAL at the ogive set with clearances of:
.024 to the lands I recorded MV ES 14 with an average of 2613 fps and a group dispersion of .747
.017 to the lands I recorded MV ES 22 with an average of 2616 fps and a group dispersion of .507
.012 to the lands I recorded MV ES 18 with an average of 2621 fps and a group dispersion of .314
The linearity of the results surprised me and, I think, lends credence to the things I've learned from the experienced guys in this forum. Wanted to offer my thanks for their contributions