I usually let responses like this ride, but I thought - WOW, how insulting and you insulted my friend and guide who was a long time elk hunter and Palma shooter from Colorado. I don’t know how many times I have responded here to help people out with either shooting and hunting and I get reminded by some members like you how little I know about each! I have hunted all over the US and Canada for 46 years and have shot high level competition for 37 years. And not done too badly at either I might ad. It is mainly what I have done for most of my 52 years. About your post. For one, a mid chest shot is not in the stomach, liver or intestines. I did not say anything about the elk quartering away. A mid chest shot is in the lungs, over the heart a few inches. Even with a chest shot it takes takes a few minutes for the blood to fill the lungs up with blood before the elk collapses. In this case, I was explaining how he got adenoline flowing in the mean time and was able to keep going. As someone here said, elk have an amazing will to live. As far as “poor bullet placement” you refered to. Yes, It was not perfect in the heart, but this was 1990, before most people had range finders. I said the shot was 350-400 yards with a 300 Win Mag. That was an educated guess, and the guy shooting was not the most experienced. Yes, there were 23 shots fired. But, the elk was traveling through aspens and pines on a moutainside 400 yards away. Yes, some missed, but some bullets probably hit trees and limbs. And “ the guide was not much of a guide by finishing the elk off with a neck shot”? We were still 400 yards away and did not want to ruin any more meat. And when were chest shots “totally useless”? I must be outdated? You need to school me on this? I really dont get your comments. Or I have really never known what I am doing?
We were hunting on high pressured, mountain, public land. Not on a ranch or prairie. We rode horse back 5 miles before daylight to get to the mountain top. We were lucky to even see a bull. Shots were hardly ever perfect where I would trust a small caliber. Lots of times the elk were grazing on an opposide mountainside. Very few areas could you see an elk in the “wide open”. There were trees and limbs in front of them. The guide said at 400 yards it may look like a a good shot but you may be shooting through an aspen sapling or spruce limb. In my opinion the high velosity small calibers everyone now raves about would splatter on a limb and possibly hit and wound an elk. I will take a slower .338 210-250g slug to get through stuff you dont see to hit and penetrate deeply in an elk. Where we hunted you had just seconds to shoot, and like I said, there were never perfect shots. You also may need to take a quartering away shot. Tough to impossible for small calibers even with bonded bullets. Also, if you did not anchor your elk quickly, they would try to get in the thick forest and fallen tree laps where you could not even a horse into to retrieve them. I guess I am a very poor marksman and want to make up with it with a big bore rifle as someone else said, but I will take that same .338 sitting in my safe when my sons get old enough to go with me out West again.
Now please, inform me how wrong, out-dated, and ignorant I am on shooting and hunting! “Peace out” Samuel Hall