• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Ejector removal..why?

When I first got into F Class, my gunsmith told me ejectors were removed to help ensure rounds were loaded without any angular bias so that's what I used to run. But I've also been told and seen that it's largely become a non-issue in modern times with all the custom high-end clones out there. I love having ejectors now (but I do cut the springs to limit how far they get thrown), it allows me to focus on the gun and my target and I'll worry about picking up rounds later. To be fair, I know F Class National champs who run both ways and it seems to largely be preference more than anything now.

I'm sure in other disciplines there's other/better reasons for one or the other.
 
I am a varmint hunter, and I had the springs reduced so the spent case falls in the mag well or at my feet. I hate trying to find a spent cases in a hay field, near impossible when the case is ejected several feet away.

As for follow-up shots, I have trained myself to clear the mag well and insert another cartridge when a follow-up shot in needed which is the exception rather than the rule. Not that I may every shot on the first attempt, but usually if I miss either the varmint spooks and disappears or is oblivious and I have plenty of time for take another shot.
 
When I first got into F Class, my gunsmith told me ejectors were removed to help ensure rounds were loaded without any angular bias so that's what I used to run. But I've also been told and seen that it's largely become a non-issue in modern times with all the custom high-end clones out there. I love having ejectors now (but I do cut the springs to limit how far they get thrown), it allows me to focus on the gun and my target and I'll worry about picking up rounds later. To be fair, I know F Class National champs who run both ways and it seems to largely be preference more than anything now.

I'm sure in other disciplines there's other/better reasons for one or the other.
I would think that more F class shooters do not use ejectors, than those that do.
 
I'm OK with Mauser type ejectors like an older Sako or the Kelbly mentioned above because you can control whether to eject or not. But I really dislike plunger ejectors and have them removed and filled on all my varmint and target rifles that came with them. Just hate the idea of dented necks and/or those carefully prepped cases hitting a concrete floor or getting lost in the grass.
For those that say an ejector is necessary for speed, please consider that before ejectors became in vogue a lot of very successful benchrest shooters were getting of 5 well aimed shots in 15 seconds without an ejector winning big matches and setting world records. It just takes a little practice to learn how and make it a natural process in your shooting.
 
I have both. My BAT action has an ejector but the way they tune them at BAT is that they drop right out below the gun rather than launching them into the next county. Makes me want to clip all the springs on all my ejectors.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,749
Messages
2,183,459
Members
78,500
Latest member
robbsintexas
Back
Top