Has anyone considered that they pit too much weight to the results of these programs?
They work very well if you feed them good information. If something is dramatically off, it's generally safe to say that it's not the calculator. It's more than likely that the user is being sloppy about inputting data. People act like there's still mystery in ballistics, and there really isn't. It was figured out many decades ago. They only mystery left is a bunch of nuance that was too minor for the aerospace industry to care about. If putting moly on a bullet significantly changes the trajectory, there WILL be an obvious reason. Since there isn't, I'm highly skeptical.Has anyone considered that they pit too much weight to the results of these programs?
I've used moly coated bullets and bore coating for decades in varmint shooting for the obvious reasons but mainly increased shot strings before mandatory cleaning.They work very well if you feed them good information. If something is dramatically off, it's generally safe to say that it's not the calculator. It's more than likely that the user is being sloppy about inputting data. People act like there's still mystery in ballistics, and there really isn't. It was figured out many decades ago. They only mystery left is a bunch of nuance that was too minor for the aerospace industry to care about. If putting moly on a bullet significantly changes the trajectory, there WILL be an obvious reason. Since there isn't, I'm highly skeptical.