Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ya know what? That's a good guess. Pics would help.Just a wild guess , maybe he coned the barrel ( like they do on rimfires ), eliminating the need to time but still give support to the case .
Big time !Ya know what? That's a good guess. Pics would help.
I should've added some kinda smiley. Here ya go!Big time !
Here is what I would like for you to do for argument sake take your depth mikes give a measurement to the short side of the bolt face and give a measurement of the actual shank length an then put a new case in chamber an give the overall length to shoulder case to shoulder that would solve a lot of guessing here then you will a really get good answer on your question.Mr Taylor I have never ordered A threaded and chamber barrel. The barrel was one of the match barrels blanks I already had. I took the action to a advertised rifle smith 140 miles one way, and went and picked it up. While there
I used his chamber gauges to check the head space, and it right. But head space is not the issue.
Thank you for your reply.
I would say without looking, those numbers seem about right. No argument here.How about some more chamber drawings not unusual to be above face on cartridges.
The op wants a answer to a question it's up to him to give solid info to bolt face an what his headspace from cartridge to shoulder an we can answer him with certainty.I would say without looking, those numbers seem about right. No argument here.
That helps justify your numbers but confuses the whole discussion. My primary concern was how much unsupported case you have.More numbers, did the clay thing. They don't quite match, I'm measuring clay on the bolt face to the barrel face.
.112, I believe that is real close to what it really is.
The smith beveled the barrel all the way around for extractor relief. I don't know if that is a good idea.
All this has me more than a little concerned.
The cone extractor cut is OK when done properly . It's common when it's not completely finished by the smith . What I mean is it allows the end user to make adjustments ,either intentional or accident , and still be timed correctly .More numbers, did the clay thing. They don't quite match, I'm measuring clay on the bolt face to the barrel face.
.112, I believe that is real close to what it really is.
The smith beveled the barrel all the way around for extractor relief. I don't know if that is a good idea.
All this has me more than a little concerned.
Make a drawing of what your seeing, or better yet post a pic . You have said bolt face, not the recess. The face is the recess!More numbers, did the clay thing. They don't quite match, I'm measuring clay on the bolt face to the barrel face.
.112, I believe that is real close to what it really is.
The smith beveled the barrel all the way around for extractor relief. I don't know if that is a good idea.
All this has me more than a little concerned.
Stan, is that .929 and .780? If so, .149 protrusion. No problem. How deep is the bolt face? Thanks for posting these. My only goal is not about who's right or wrong. It's about the numbers provided earlier by the op, not you, my friend. His numbers were quite different than yours and looked like a real potential safety problem. We're slowly getting to the bottom of this and hopefully all is well. Much better safe than sorry imho.I am probably sticking my neck out here but here is a factory L579 sako barrel in 22-250 look at measures in these pics.
That's the reason I posted a factory barrel an yes that .929 overall with the cartridge in chamber that's basically what his Smith should have did getting ready to duplicate that sako barrel an install a new tube the recession in bolt is .060 deep end of extractor to face is .140 deep.It's hard to teach us old dog's this new technology here is a picture of what I use to dial in a barrel when I chamber.LOLStan, is that .929 and .780? If so, .149 protrusion. No problem. How deep is the bolt face? Thanks for posting these. My only goal is not about who's right or wrong. It's about the numbers provided earlier by the op, not you, my friend. His numbers were quite different than yours and looked like a real potential safety problem. We're slowly getting to the bottom of this and hopefully all is well. Much better safe than sorry imho.
That sounds a lot better for sure good job.PS a little more cartridge case above face than I would like to see but your Smith should correct that with a minimum amount of work.Thank you Stan for correcting me on what a bolt face is, that makes all my numbers in correct.
I have the numbers you ask for, but pictures I'm not able to send. I have ordered a new pc.
.164" cartridge chambered,head to end of barrel.
.759" threaded end of barrel to shoulder. De Haas bolt action book, says it should be .870".
.927" bolt face to receiver face.
.059" bolt head recess.
Hope they add up.
Thanks
But it's an hour and a half drive , I think he said .Fixed it