Thanks.
Thanks.
So it looks like the reamer is different but the dies are interchangeable?
According to the article, the 6BR-N simply has a longer throat for the longer/heavier bullets. The 6BR-R was built to run 70's and shorter/lighter. The body of the die would be the same then, no?If the reamer is different the dies will be too. You wont like it if you interchange em- brass, chambers or dies they gotta match
Norma / Lapua brass is usually larger at the base . Remington design had a longer neck . Now it's all grouped together till a Rem reamer is tried with Lapua brass . Then the little gremlins show up , bolt click ,hard lift hard chambering etc . You already figured out that the orig Rem design has a shorter ball seat .According to the article, the 6BR-N simply has a longer throat for the longer/heavier bullets. The 6BR-R was built to run 70's and shorter/lighter. The body of the die would be the same then, no?
It's early and I haven't had coffee yet so I could be missing something. Don't rag me too hard!![]()
Well here is to 6mmbr cases the one in the mike is 6mmbr Remington it is 4 thousands smaller than the 6mmbr Norma right above it case length the same.View attachment 1042440
im glad you show the correct dims...most of these kids never shot or had one of the original Rem BR chambers or brass (UBR--308 w/small primer),,,they were very different,,,I have answered this particular question several times and it is good for you to show that more than a few know these facts,,,Lapua brass is far superior but it is different and should not be attempted to use in the old style chambers or use with the old style dies,,,,to the best of my knowledge all dies and reamers currently on the market will work in concert with the modern day Norma/Lapua brass,,,,as you and others have said the old stuff was not only smaller at the .200 line but most chambers were 1.520 +/- a little,,,I hope I never see one of those old chambers or that junk brass we had to deal with ever again !!!!,,,,RogerWell here is to 6mmbr cases the one in the mike is 6mmbr Remington it is 4 thousands smaller than the 6mmbr Norma right above it case length the same.View attachment 1042440
The difference here is SAAMI and CIP. SAAMI provides voluntary guidelines that most manufacturers follow to ensure interchangeability between various brands of firearms and ammunition. While SAAMI is a voluntary organization, CIP (think of it as the EU equivalent) has force of law behind them, and can legally compel member organizations to follow their regulations. One of their requirements is that any material alteration in case or bullet dimensions that would prevent the resulting ammo from being used in other firearms of the same nomenclature, requires new nomenclature. This is where the 6mm BR Norma comes from. Developed from the existing 6mm BR Remington for 300 meter competition, the "new" cartridge utilizes the exact same case, but requires a longer throat and faster twist rate for the use of the 105-107 grain bullets that were originally used in this type of competition. Since the original 6mm BR Remingtons were set up around a 68-70 grain bullet, had a much shorter throat and were normally set up with 1x14" twists (or thereabouts) the ammunition that Norma was loading for 300 meter completion couldn't be used in the original 6mm BR rifles. Under CIP regulations, this called for different cartridge nomenclature even though the cases are in fact identical. Any minor variations in dimensions are simply those commonly seen between different makes of components, and wouldn't otherwise materially affect their use in either chamber. I still have a 6mm BR, set up for the 70 gr. SMK, short throated and equipped with a 1x14" barrel that has seen nothing but Lapua 6mm BR Norma cases. Here in the US, with SAAMI guidelines in place, this wouldn't have required a new designation, and it would have been up to the shooter/handloader to understand the differences and load accordingly. But since Norma is a CIP member, and was loading the ammo, a new designation came to be.
Thanks for the pictures. What is the difference in case length? I don't remember the numbers but the friend that I referred to had to trim a bunch off of the Lapua brass to try it in his Remington spec' chamber. The problem came came from the close fit between unfired brass and the chamber. He got a tight bolt at lower velocities than he had with the Rem. brass. Once the chamber was corrected the problem went away.View attachment 1042451 Well here is to 6mmbr cases the one in the mike is 6mmbr Remington it is 4 thousands smaller than the 6mmbr Norma right above it case length the same.View attachment 1042440notice the writing on the box.
The case length on both the 6br Norma an the br Remington was the same the problem comes from over working the backend of case an squeezing the shoulder forward..PS the 6 br Remington case is 1.555 long the factory6mm br Norma brass is 1.540 long.Thanks for the pictures. What is the difference in case length? I don't remember the numbers but the friend that I referred to had to trim a bunch off of the Lapua brass to try it in his Remington spec' chamber. The problem came came from the close fit between unfired brass and the chamber. He got a tight bolt at lower velocities than he had with the Rem. brass. Once the chamber was corrected the problem went away.
Thanks. You (and others) may find this interesting. I do remember that for my friends chamber that he had to trim Lapua brass. The second post in this thread describes a dimension difference that I think corresponds to my friend's experience. Obviously your brass is different from what he was using. I have no idea why. http://6mmbr.websitetoolbox.com/post/6mmbr-history-2250267The case length on both the 6br Norma an the br Remington was the same the problem comes from over working the backend of case an squeezing the shoulder forward..PS the 6 br Remington case is 1.555 long the factory6mm br Norma brass is 1.540 long.