I would think that he had made a mistake in his methodology in measurement to the lands. He would have to be cleaning with coarse valve grinding compound to erode the throat to the amount that he has stated.
Maybe I'm missing it, but if he leaves oil in the chamber as well as the barrel he's gonna have problems there also. but I expect that fast twist and long bullet and measuring process is going to be the problem.....OK. I'll be seeing him on Saturday and I'll ask him for a barrel to bring home and examine.
I have found out this: His 223 barrels are 6.5 twist and his is shooting 90s.
His 308 barrels are more normal twist at 10.
Here is his cleaning procedure. Note the "oil in barrel" related to another popular thread lately:
1
Wet patch of Butch’s boreshine, normal loop tip
Use boreguide
2
At least one dry patch
Use Parker jag
3
Repeat several times based on dirt
2 to 3 times normally
4
Spray M Pro 7 in chamber and clean with nylon brush
1-2 times
5
Wet patch with Kroil and swab barrel and chamber
Leave in gun and fire next match with oil in barrel
6
Dissaemble bolt and clean with M Pro
--Jerry
Powder was my first thought, I would have a sample analyzed by an independent lab, probably won't cost that much and then eliminate that.....I was asked my thoughts on this by a manufacture that has scoped the barrels. They really are burning out like he says. Im not sure any cleaning methods could cause anything like this. Its very strange. At this point I would be running some powder through a mesh trying to find the abrasive that some how got in there. A .223 should not have .400 throat wear unless its a machine gun.
Is he using a less common throat configuration than the 1*30. Sometimes these will exhibit more rapid throat wear, but not likely at the rate being reported here. Perhaps a visit to Alex Wheelers site and review the info regarding finding the lands might help out. Sometimes getting a good baseline can be problematic