Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why is Hillary wearing that Trump button?I do! It's disgusting.....
View attachment 1022898
I don't know that the BC changes at all, But the drag at different velocities does. Others can correct me if I"m wrong, but the banded BC's in the sierra manual are to account for the changing drag at different velocities. I read on here somewhere that a bullet sitting on your bench has the same BC as one flying to the target.Remember also as the bullet goes down range its BC changes as it looses velocity. Some programs calculate for this some don't. That's why BC charts like the one in the Sierra Manuel list bullet BC's at different velocities.
One more time, let something else do it for you.The BC has to change based on velocity, it's a given. But BC stays the same if a bullet can keep its velocity, but it can't. BC is a number that bullet makers same is correct. Air, thicker or thinner, creates drag, air changes everyday, every hour causing less or more drag causing bullets to drop differently on a given day. This is what I'm seeing, and need to account for it. Velocity is what it is (I think) speed based on a crono. BC is what it is, a number. The only thing that changes is weather, causing DA to change, which means less of more drag on the bullet.
One more time, let something else do it for you.
https://kestrelmeters.com/products/kestrel-elite-weather-meter-with-applied-ballistics
This accounts for loss of speed as bullet flies.
An app on a phone will do it too if you stay on top of it throughout the day, I used to like AB, it has not been updated in sometime, other great ones. I find getting DA from the nearest race track used to work, they give predicted DA throughout the day.It's on my list of "things to have" but for the time being, lack of funds, I have to make due with what I have. That is a phone (ballistic app) crono, range finder, and what I know and can understand.
Thanks for the input everyone. I'm not trying to over think this, just trying to know why it happens, and explain what I'm seeing. I'm not trying to reinvent anything here, Just trying to understand how/what happens .
....... snip...............
Humidity also affects Mach, and your standard drag coefficients are looked up/compared per mach# by ballistic software to internally work with relative BC. In other words, disregarding RH is more an error than just being off with air density solutions(affecting drag calcs)........ snip...........
Interesting. My numbers were based on the physics associated with aerodynamics and I'm guessing yours came out of a ballistics calculator. Am I right? Anyhow, our numbers match up nicely coming at it from two different directions.At ICAO SL standard, which is 59deg, 29.921inHg, 0%Rh, MACH1 = 1116fps
Add 100%Rh, and MACH1 = 1189fps, 73fps faster.
Multiply this error x2.5 for a bullet traveling at M2.5 ->
ICAO would be 2791fps
Add 100%Rh and M2.5 is 2974fps
183fps difference(73 x 2.5)
The difference that makes to calculated local BC (if humidity is not entered) ->
Beginning with a G1 ICAO BC of .500 at 2791fps(M2.5)
Add 100%Rh(actual) at 2791fps(now M2.346), and local BC(actual) goes to .497
That's BC going down to .494 because M# dropped + .003 add for lower air density.
So in this case, if .500 was entered for ICAO BC, and 100% Rh was present but not entered, actual BC would be .003 lower than entered.
You're right Mozella. Compared to all the other abstracts, RH is not a big deal.
I get too hung up in numbers..
Mozella, that's why I call them... flyers....LOL
Thanks for putting a name to that dang bug. Always gone by the time I slap at them, but you're right about the pain. Sucks!
In Kalifornia, we had cattle flies. God awful bite, thought I'd left that behind moving to Texas. NOT!