Flitz, JB's, IOSSO
Is that the correct order??
Iosso is less abrasive than JB due to using a softer abrasive of a comparable grit.
That’s because it’s not a bore cleaner it’s a pure metal polish.
Yep, that is the correct reason why I did not include it.
I think that remington 40x bore cleaner from back in the day has silicon carbide in it. Same stuff on sandpaper. Man is it ruff.
40x is Diatomaceous earth, 40x is about the same hardness and grit of JB Bore cleaning compound.
Iosso seems more aggressive than JB Bore Cleaning Compound. The Flitz is a polish and would be the least abrasive of the three.
Iosso is very similar in grit to JB, but is made of softer abrasive. Iosso is softer than barrel steel, JB is harder than barrel steel. Flitz has an abrasive close in hardness to JB, but much finer grit.
Abrasives using materials that are as soft or softer than barrel steel.
IOSSO
BORETECH CHAMELEON GEL
Rottenstone (Decomposed limestone)
Thorroclean (Bulletcentral)
OF these, only IOSSO is widely adopted and accepted as a very good abrasive. The boretech really isn’t much of an abrasive at all, rottenstone is like mixing your own and only stock makers have it on hand. Thorroclean seems every bit as good as IOSSO, but the price for the “system” compared to IOSSO is not favorable.
We’ve discussed the Hardness of the abrasive as well as the grit. Taj45 made a good point about the density of the abrasive in the medium.
The density of abrasive in IOSSO is high, Thorroclean is lower, Boretech is Lowest. SDS sheets provide info about % of product.
ALL other abrasives are harder than barrel steel.
JB is pure product so the density is however you mix it (Kroil on VFG Felt Pad, Patch on jag, patch on brush etc).