I am now pretty much 100% certain that seating depth variations are due to bullet inconsistencies.
I have been using a Wilson hand die and a arbor press. With .308 SMK bullets there is a .001-.002 difference in the ogive to tip of the bullet where the die makes contact. I'm now sure of it. It's not neck tension or lack of or too much lube. The Wilson is a straight stop die with no springs and it stops in the same place every time.
Why can't someone design a seating die that seats off the ogive? That's were we take our measurements for seating depth.
I understand that it would have to be a design that does not deform or mark the ogive, but I don't see this issue as rocket surgery.
I have been using a Wilson hand die and a arbor press. With .308 SMK bullets there is a .001-.002 difference in the ogive to tip of the bullet where the die makes contact. I'm now sure of it. It's not neck tension or lack of or too much lube. The Wilson is a straight stop die with no springs and it stops in the same place every time.
Why can't someone design a seating die that seats off the ogive? That's were we take our measurements for seating depth.
I understand that it would have to be a design that does not deform or mark the ogive, but I don't see this issue as rocket surgery.