• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

COMPETITION CARTRIDGES - 223 REMINGTON

A couple of shooters have asked why I did not include the 223 Remington in my series on Competition Cartridges. First of all, the 223 never really caught on as a competitive cartridge. Flanked by the 222 on one side and the 222 Magnum on the other doesn’t leave much room for improvement and shooters, for some reason, love to "improve" a cartridge rather than shooting one right out of the box. Second, since my series was also intended to explore the history of the cartridges, the convoluted development of the 223 was hardly the type of thing non-collectors would be interested in. But, I’ll try and cover it as best I can and even show a few of the prototype cartridges that led to its adoption.

The concept of a small caliber high velocity military cartridge is anything but new, going back more than 100 years. The venerable 30-06 is but one of many in the lineup. ,Yes, the ‘06 was considered both small caliber and high velocity in its day) But at the end of World War II, development of a light, small caliber infantry weapon accelerated to a frenzy level not only in the United States but many other countries as well. Every caliber from 17 to 30 was loaded in case sizes ranging from the 30 Carbine to the 30-06. Unusual and bizarre bullet ideas, such as multiple projectiles, steel penetrators, and flechettes,darts) were tested, apparently without limit or restraint. But in the late 1950s two reasonable ideas finally came together for the first time - an extended length 222 Remington case and the Armalite AR 15 rifle. The race ended in 1964 with the adoption of the M16 Rifle and the 5.56 x 45mm cartridge.,I have greatly simplified the history for your benefit. It was anything but simple.)

Shortly thereafter, Remington introduced the commercial version of the cartridge, the 223 Remington. Benchrest shooters didn’t exactly rush to embrace the new cartridge. A few tried it exactly as sold by Remington, some improved it by blowing out the shoulder to 40 and 45 degrees, even fewer necked it up to .243,6x45). But none of these could do anything that the 222 and 222 Magnum based cartridges weren’t already doing. The introduction of the PPC and BR lines in the 1970s pretty well sounded the death knell for all three.

The military 5.56 x 45mm is still used in competition where it is one of only three cartridges permitted in “as issued” service rifle matches, the 7.62x51 and 30-06 being the other two. Every once in a while a long-range shooter will forget what history has tried to teach him and will try to resurrect the .223 with the high BC 80 and 90 grain bullets. But except for military rifle and exclusive AR-15 competition it is seldom seen on the firing line today.

Pictured are four of the prototypes and three of the competition cartridges from my collection.
 

Attachments

  • apg_22_001.JPG
    apg_22_001.JPG
    87.3 KB · Views: 172
Ray, great info and serries!
I've got a question a little off,ok WAY off) topic - feel free to email me if you'd rather - and especially, thank you, in advance, if you can help! I'm looking for info on the materials most often used for "turned" 50 caliber bullets - or have these gone by the wayside already? R.G. bibrob@netins.net
 
Cheechako said:
First of all, the 223 never really caught on as a competitive cartridge.
:mad:
Ray,
That statement is as correct as saying "benchrest is not a sport.",That's an opinion voiced by some - but not me.) Every year, more .223 rifles are used in competition in the US than there are benchrest shooters in the whole world. And that's not an opinion, that's a FACT. In some events, the ONLY cartridge that you can use is the .223 Remington/5.56 NATO.

In the US, competitions that see .223 being used include:
* NRA Highpower. Rifles include M16A2s and civilian equivalents,Service Rifle), and semiautomatic and bolt action rifles,Match Rifles);
* NRA Long Range. Same rifles as above;
* F-Class - both TR and Open. Actions can be semiautomatic or bolt action;
* Military/Police matches;
* Sniper/tactical matches;
* Action rifle matches.

Every .224" match bullet weighing more than 55 grains was originally developed for use in the .223 Remington/5.56 NATO. At least 17 different bullets are produced by just 4 major manufacturers,Sierra, Hornady, Nosler, and Berger). And there are more choices available from other vendors.

Every once in a while a long-range shooter will forget what history has tried to teach him and will try to resurrect the .223 with the high BC 80 and 90 grain bullets.
Really?
* Using a bolt action, I've finished as high as 4th in a 2 day long 1000 yard match - 60 shots/day. Wasn't the rifle or caliber holding me back either.
* When using a .308 in 1000 yard matches, I've been BEATEN by shooters using AR-15 Service Rifles.
 
Asa
Your info is more in line with mine. The .223 will outperform the .222 and .222 Mag in velocity and accuracy. One of the still standing 100yd NBRSA groups was shot with the .223 it is the HV record of .027. The .009 group could be a questionable fluke but the .027 is well documented.
I have a several .222 rifles but I specifically looked for a .223 specifically a medium taper 788. What a gun. What led me to the .223 was 3 things I have several thousand WCC 64 clean once fired brass, I watched competition at San Gabriel with .223 rifles, awesome accuracy at LR and I make my own BR quality 22 bullets.
People take for granted the .223 because of it's widespread use. I would go to war with one.
Stephen Perry
 
Hoooo Boy! Did I open a can of worms or what?:eek:

Asa, you know that I very much respect your opinions and often rely on your expertise in matters far and wide. I cannot disagree with any of your post. But let me try to explain a little bit in my own defense.

I did write this particular article,and most of the others) with a Benchrest slant because that is who I am at this point in my shooting career. I could be wrong but I've always felt that most readers of the 6mmBR Forums have a similar leaning. Believe me, if I had written the article for publication on Long-Range.com or the National Match.us Website it would have been worded differently, although my basic premise would have been the same.

I thought that I fairly covered my a$$ in the last paragraph as regards those shooters who DO use the 5.56x45 in competition. And you are correct that there are a lot of them although I'm not convinced there are more of them than Benchrest shooters in the whole world. And I do not believe that the cartridge is often seen in some of the classes that you mentioned. Occasionally yes - often no. Excluding those tournaments that REQUIRE the use of the AR type rifles or the 5.56x45 cartridge I think it would not get too many votes as the preferred alternative. Maybe not even yours?

I hope that Forum members who read my initial thread will see you response as well. There are two sides to every cat and more than one way to skin a coin . . . errrr, you know what I mean.;)

Ray
 
Ray,

Besides just the Service Rifle shooters, where the AR/.223 eclipsed the .30 cal M1's and M1A's years ago, the .223 sees a fair amount of use as a Match Rifle... basically open class, no holds barred,literally, very few rules on the gun itself). A lot of it's appeal does have to do w/ it's mild manners @ 200/300yds, and not having to 're-train' when going from a Service Rifle to a Match Rifle i.e. not having to learn how to operate a stick-shift,bolt gun) in the Rapid Fire strings after years of using an automatic.

Yes, there are better choices out there if a person wants to chase ballistic advantage. No doubt about it. The .223 is kind of like the .308 in that it does pretty dang well at a task for which it was never really intended, and for that I think it deserves a little more credit.

Monte
 
Cheechako said:
And you are correct that there are a lot of them although I'm not convinced there are more of them than Benchrest shooters in the whole world.
As of 2004, there were 32,000 shooters with active classifications in NRA highpower. I suspect at least 25-50% of classified shooters today own and compete with at least one AR Service Rifle or Match Rifle chambered in .223.

And I do not believe that the cartridge is often seen in some of the classes that you mentioned. Occasionally yes - often no. Excluding those tournaments that REQUIRE the use of the AR type rifles or the 5.56x45 cartridge I think it would not get too many votes as the preferred alternative. Maybe not even yours?
* Many NRA highpower shooters shoot Service Rifle by choice. These days, the AR-15 is the most common service rifle - bar none. At any match fired at 600 yards and less, it isn't uncommon for over half the firing line on a range to be using AR-15s.
* Prices for accurized ARs start under $1000. For that amount, you will not be able to accurize an M1 or M14 clone to shoot to the same level. Building a match rifle will cost at least $1200 - some can even run over $5000.
* Barrel life on a .223 rifle is reasonable,usually between 2500-5000 rounds). Parts for rifles,especially ARs) are easy to obtain,and aren't expensive). That is, when you need them. Parts seldom break, because the cartridge doesn't generate a lot of stress on the rifle.
* Depending on the shooter, ammo expendeture per year can vary between 1000-4000 rounds/year. .223s Are popular because they cost less to feed. Per round, cost is 50-60% of that for a .308.
* The majority of highpower matches are not fired "full course",i.e., out to 500 or 600 yards). At 300 yards and less, a .223 compares favorably to other cartridges. While wind drift is slightly inferior,compared to ballistically efficient cartridges), lower recoil allows for faster recovery onto target. In highpower shooting, group size isn't the deciding factor. Shoot a 10 shot, 1/2 MOA group in the 9 ring, and you'll lose to a 1.5 MOA group where all the shots land in the 10 and X ring.
* In F-TR, you have your choice of cartridges - so long as they're a .223 or .308. At 600 yards, the ballistics of the .223 compare favorably to those of a similar rifle in .308.
 
Asa
You are the source the other guy is the imitator. He will come back with another qualifing statement about how old he is and how he shot an Enfield in Hi Power when they were $10.
I talked to Jeff Mendoza tonight at the San Gabriel meeting. Gave him my last shoot ticket to use. Good guy runs an efficient Hi Power Shoot. He talked something about moving his Shoot Operation to some range in Burbank.
Stephen Perry
 
StephenPerry said:
The .223 will outperform the .222 and .222 Mag in velocity and accuracy.

How would it come to be that the .223 would outperform the .222 Mag in velocity? The case .222 Mag case capacity is greater, yes? Does some standard specify that the .223 can be loaded to higher pressures?
 
ghermitage said:
StephenPerry said:
The .223 will outperform the .222 and .222 Mag in velocity and accuracy.

How would it come to be that the .223 would outperform the .222 Mag in velocity? The case .222 Mag case capacity is greater, yes? Does some standard specify that the .223 can be loaded to higher pressures?

I was wondering the same thing. I shoot a 223 and friend shoots a 222 Mag and his is faster than mine, same barrel length.

Mike
 
Asa, Monte, et al

I don't like to get into "numbers" debates so let's just say that I concede that there are a lot of 223 competitive shooters out there. I do think that I covered that in my closing paragraph although I can see where those shooters could infer that they were given the dirty end of the stick. I certainly didn't intend it that way, believe me.

I have done a little writing in my time and learned long ago that you have to write to your audience. That's what I was doing here. In my defense I have to say that I do not personally know any 223 competitors but now I've learned, the hard way, that there are at least two of them active on the 6mmBR Forums. I'll be more careful in the future.:)

Ray
 
Cheechako said:
...In my defense I have to say that I do not personally know any 223 competitors but now I've learned, the hard way, that there are at least two of them active on the 6mmBR Forums...
We're everywhere! We're everywhere!,Insert scene from the movie "Aliens" here...) :eek:

No problem, Ray. I wasn't flaming you - just setting the record straight.
 
RGRobinett said:
Ray, great info and serries!
I've got a question a little off,ok WAY off) topic - feel free to email me if you'd rather - and especially, thank you, in advance, if you can help! I'm looking for info on the materials most often used for "turned" 50 caliber bullets - or have these gone by the wayside already? R.G. bibrob@netins.net

Randy

I know that the solid bore-rider type bullets are made of some sort of brass/bronze alloy but never gave much thought to what it actually was. So, I asked a 50 caliber shooting buddy and here's the straight scoop.

"Just about any copper alloy will go down a tube. The most common is 360 brass,copper/zinc alloy). I have been using leaded bronze, but its a bit more expensive than the 360. Oxygen free copper and 5% copper alloy seems to be gaining in popularty, but its way more expensive and a pain to get a good finish unless you have a swiss turn machine.

The material does make a difference in how pressure is developed because some materials engrave with more force than others. Other things taken in consideration is weight, hardness, how it fouls, cost, availability and machinability."

Now we both know. And no, they have not gone by the wayside. There are probably more solid bullets used in 50 caliber than any other with the exception of surplus GI bullets.

Ray
 
Ray,
OT here, but I thought a few bore riders were made from 12L14 steel as well? That, or free machining bronze?

AHA! Just found this: http://www.riflebarrels.com/articles/50calibre/material_50cal_bullets.htm . The answer is "all of the above".
 
Asa

As I said, I didn't really know the answer to Randy's question so went to one shooter that uses them,and makes them too).

That is a GREAT link. Leave it to Dan to take the time to put together something like that. I have shot with him many times,Benchrest) and he is a great guy and a wealth of knowledge. And a good shooter too, BTW.

Ray
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,800
Messages
2,203,697
Members
79,130
Latest member
Jsawyer09
Back
Top