• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Competition Cartridges Part One

I am a competition shooter, a cartridge collector, and an amateur historian, not necessarily in that order. I thought that this Forum would be a good place to share a little of my interests with you by describing a few of the competition cartridges from my collection, but also picturing them and, when appropriate, giving a little history of how they came to be. I’ll start with one that everybody knows, the 222 Remington.

In 1948 Remington introduced their new Model 722 rifles. The first “short action” Remington, it was chambered in 300 Savage and 257 Roberts and advertised as a new, lighter weight, big game rifle. But even before the first 722 found its way to gun store shelves, Remington was looking at the rifle as the foundation for a new live-varmint cartridge, something that would fill the gap between the 22 Hornet and the 220 Swift. Rather than try to modify one of the existing cartridges, Remington R&D decided to develop a completely new case. The prototype looked very much like todays 221 Fireball. It was 1.450" long and loaded with a 48-grain soft-point bullet. Different primers, powders, and powder charges were tested for velocity and accuracy. But Mike Walker, the designer of the 722 action, thought the cartridge was too short to feed reliably through the 722 action and so he recommended a slightly longer case. With the redesigned cartridge in hand, he and F&S Gun Editor Warren Page set forth to test it in the field. They found the bullet to be too hard resulting in ricochets and unreliable expansion and recommended the weight be increased to 50 grains, the jacket thinned, and the velocity increased to 3200 fps. All three changes were adopted and the new 222 Remington was introduced in early 1950.

Both Page and Walker were Benchrest shooters and saw the potential of the new cartridge for 100 and 200-yard benchrest. It was first used in competition in 1951 and started winning everything in sight, dominating for more than 20 years. But there’s not a Benchrest shooter alive who doesn’t think a good cartridge can be made better and even it was wildcatted. Shown below are six cartridges from my collection. A 222 Prototype, a standard 222 Remington varmint load, a 222 Remington Benchrest load, and three wildcats, the 222-35, 222-40, and 222 Haney.
 

Attachments

  • 222_remington.jpg
    222_remington.jpg
    41.3 KB · Views: 175
This thread is a neat idea! Thank you. Let's see more.

Also... If anybody's got old competition rifles gathering dust, it would sure be neat to see a few photos of "the way things were."

Thanks! Guy
 
I've got a tight neck reamer for the .222 and I keep saying that I'm going to build a real Benchrest rifle with it someday.

I know it probably won't compete with my 6PPC, but I'd really like to see how well it could shoot with a modern action/barrel/stock and Lapua brass.

Someday...

Jerry
 
JerryW said:
..., but I'd really like to see how well it could shoot with a modern action/barrel/stock and Lapua brass.

I wouldn't expect much out of the .222 Lapua brass. I just bought 600 pieces of it for a .17-222 and would have taken it all back if I hadn't opened almost all of the boxes before I started forming. I'd gotten so used to Lapua quality that I didn't even bother QC'ing it until I started deburring flash holes and noticed that most of the flash holes were out of round,not to mention huge). So I took a sample of 20 of them over and weighed them. Sadly, I found a weight variation of greater than 2% just in the sample of 20.

I have one box unopened and it's going back. I'll try RWS the next time I buy .222 brass.

robert
 
rstreich -- send them back to Lapua...in the original box, or at least email the info and inside flap # to them...THEY WILL TAKE CARE OF YOU.

Mention you are a member of this forum...

erkki.seikkula@ nammo.fi

JB
 
Great Post!

I shoot the "Deuce" a lot and it has become one of my all time favorites for going after the local woodchuck problems on my friends farm. I have had the honor of being able to talk with Mike Walker, when he calls in for shooting supplies, and he is so free with the information that he has locked up inside his head. I learned more from him, in a 10 to 15 minute conversation, than I could have ever hoped for, when it comes to the Deuce. I have found that the Norma brass in the Deuce is some of the best stuff that I have used, especially if I am shooting from the bench. When I am using my old Remington 788 for shooting in some of the local varmint rifle matches, in the factory stock classes, I have found the Norma to deliver the best consistency in this old rifle. When I started doing my checks of this brass, I discovered that the flash holes were almost as small as the PPC & BR cases. I found that these small holes helped the accuracy, the same as it helps the PPC & BR. So, talk about a bonus! I changed the decapping punch in my Wilson neck die to the PPC/BR stem, and it works great for these small hole Deuce cases. I have since found out that this is not something that is consistent in all lots of Norma .222 brass, but I sure go out of my way to try and get them this way! It helps when shooting from the bench, but I generally switch to Winchester brass when I am actually varmint hunting.

Cordially,
Bob Blaine
 
Bob
The .222 needn't be placed tied into the benchrest game any longer. It's competition days ended in the mid 1980's when PPC took over the numbers. The fact that it has been a fine accuracy cartridge between 1950 and today is a plus for today's shooters. I have the original gun that Remington made for the deuce. My 722 in .222 came as strange looking gun. Low comb stock, iron sights, 26" slim barrel. Not hardly what some would today call a varmint gun. I shot it this way for 15 years. Finally about 1980 all the stock work and bluing I had done for my friends shop got me curious. The operation began. First I stripped the red finish the factory was hiding the straight grain wood with. I go through 5 grades of paper ending up with wet 600 grit. You wouldn't want to pay for the time I put into a stock job. When it was done it looked custom. After napping off the dust and rinsing in acetone a glass finish is applied sanded off a couple times and then the final glass is brushed on. After drying for a couple days in a dust free vault the buffing wheels are loaded up with rouge. Buffing is done several times different compounds being carefully not to burn. If all works out and bubbles don't appear you have a life-time finish. A 1/2" Pachmyer pad was added.
I had the barrel cut from 26" down to 24 1/2" to remove the front sight and make the gun easier to handle. I sand papered the old bluing off using several grits of paper 80,120, 240, ending with 400 grit. Try to leave the barrel stamping there, if you are good you can the others need to not try. On the buffing wheel for the type of finish you want and barrel was ready to sent to the blue tanks.
I don't do photos but as you can imagine my 722 looks like a custom rifle, it is now semi-custom no checkering.
It does shoot well but with the factory barrel I know what 1/4" groups look like, mine is not as their's aren't
For a .222 I have 2 ways of preparing ammo. One using my CH dies which I've had as long as the gun. These dies full length size and I wouldn't trade them for anything on the market today.
I go through the standard routine like that in an RCBS manual.
I also use something different. I use WCC 64 Nam cartridges in .223, form them in my CH dies and trim the necks. I like these because I get a thicker neck I can trim on my Forester nk turner. I load either cast bullets I make or Sierra 52&53 bullets. Usually 4198 or 4895 powder with CCI 400 or WSR primers. The other way is the full BR method. Wilson dies & trimmer. Wilson Seater. Doesn't do much for my 722 but mandatory with my .222 BR barrel.
How can you lose with the .222. Great accuracy mild recoil, less noise. Like shooting a miniature 30-06. Even look similar.
Remington or should I say Mike Walker pulled the right strings to get the deuce on the market.
Stephen Perry
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,706
Messages
2,201,020
Members
79,060
Latest member
Trayarcher99
Back
Top