• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Colorado Senate Votes to Ban Semi-Auto gun sales

I blame the voters, not the politicians who they elected. Here in the socialist state of Delaware, we have to do the same to buy a handgun, even a revolver. Unfortunately Colorado was over run with Californians and Delaware's been over run with New Yorkers, New Jerseyites, Marylanders and other left wing states and they brought their politics with them.
 
A tad tangental, but the cost of car insurance is skyrocketing due to the 22 year old male who is smoking the devil weed. Pisses me right off that I am paying his bills from my perfect driving record. Says the state government that legalizes said weeds "it will benefit our tax base". At the cost of our productivity and our insurance rates.

Now, back to our regular programming...

This legislation will eventually be overturned. Stay the course and just sit on your stuff boys.
 
I think that Rocky Mountain Gun Owners is falling on there Sword! As soon as this bill was released they should have had recall petitions filed. It worked before in Colorado. And it would work again.
If the Develcrates would fear loosing their positions of power they might have second thoughts'

Two women just introduced SB25-1258. a bill that changes that Div of Wildlife SHALL use hunting, trapping to control Wildlife. to it now MAY use Hunting and trapping to control wildlife.
So there goes Hunting and Trapping in Colorado!
 
from our state association

The Revised Semi-Auto Ban is Even Worse Than the Original



After speaking extensively with our legal team, we have a more complete understanding of what Senate Bill 25-003 will now mean for Colorado gun owners should it become law after being amended so heavily. The basics are that this bill is now, in many ways, even worse than it was before the amendments.


Under Senate Bill 3 in its new form, Coloradans will be eligible to purchase any of the firearms this bill restricts only if they’ve completed the following actions:
  • Received from their Sheriff, after submitting their fingerprints for a criminal background screening, an eligibility/ID card that qualifies them to participate in a firearms safety course.
  • Having received the eligibility/ID card from their Sheriff, completed an extended firearms safety course within five years before the purchase, or completed both a hunter safety course and a basic firearms safety course within five years before the purchase.
  • Having completed all the steps above, passed an exam testing their knowledge of the safety course’s subject matter with a score not less than 90 percent.


If you think that jumbled web of bureaucratic red tape is bad, we are only getting started explaining all of the new implications of this bill.


To receive the above-mentioned eligibility/ID card, you must pay a processing fee to the Sheriff’s Office. To take the courses required for eligibility to access the restricted firearms, you must pay a fee, in an amount to be determined by Colorado Parks and Wildlife, to the instructor of the course who will then remit the fee to the State to fund another egregious part of this bill that we will touch on momentarily.


Sheriffs issuing the eligibility/ID card will be required to submit the card’s information (your full name, the county of issuance, and the signature of the issuing Sheriff) to the “Training and Safety Course Record System” which this bill would create, to be funded by the fee you will pay the instructor. If that sounds like a means to build a state-owned list of individuals who are very likely to own semi-automatic firearms, that’s because it is exactly that. And we mustn’t forget that creating a list of gun owners is almost always an early step in the process of confiscating arms.


The bill also grants the Sheriff what would appear to be unchecked discretion to deny or revoke these eligibility cards if the Sheriff believes that “documented previous behavior” by the applicant or cardholder makes it likely the person could present a danger to themself or others. The bill does not specify what kind of “documented previous behavior” should trigger a denial or revocation. According to the language of this bill, the only standard for denial or revocation is any particular Sheriff’s “reasonable belief” that a person should not hold an eligibility card. For all the bill tells us, the “documented previous behavior” could be something like a past Facebook post referring to the American founders’ belief that the Second Amendment ought to exist so the citizenry can defend against a tyrannical government. In any case, you can’t even get to the starting line of the series of hoops they’ll require you to jump through without a government official making a subjective judgment call on your moral character.

This is easily in the running for the worst piece of legislation we’ve ever seen, and we’ve seen a lot of bad legislation. It must be defeated.
 
from our state association

The Revised Semi-Auto Ban is Even Worse Than the Original



After speaking extensively with our legal team, we have a more complete understanding of what Senate Bill 25-003 will now mean for Colorado gun owners should it become law after being amended so heavily. The basics are that this bill is now, in many ways, even worse than it was before the amendments.


Under Senate Bill 3 in its new form, Coloradans will be eligible to purchase any of the firearms this bill restricts only if they’ve completed the following actions:
  • Received from their Sheriff, after submitting their fingerprints for a criminal background screening, an eligibility/ID card that qualifies them to participate in a firearms safety course.
  • Having received the eligibility/ID card from their Sheriff, completed an extended firearms safety course within five years before the purchase, or completed both a hunter safety course and a basic firearms safety course within five years before the purchase.
  • Having completed all the steps above, passed an exam testing their knowledge of the safety course’s subject matter with a score not less than 90 percent.


If you think that jumbled web of bureaucratic red tape is bad, we are only getting started explaining all of the new implications of this bill.


To receive the above-mentioned eligibility/ID card, you must pay a processing fee to the Sheriff’s Office. To take the courses required for eligibility to access the restricted firearms, you must pay a fee, in an amount to be determined by Colorado Parks and Wildlife, to the instructor of the course who will then remit the fee to the State to fund another egregious part of this bill that we will touch on momentarily.


Sheriffs issuing the eligibility/ID card will be required to submit the card’s information (your full name, the county of issuance, and the signature of the issuing Sheriff) to the “Training and Safety Course Record System” which this bill would create, to be funded by the fee you will pay the instructor. If that sounds like a means to build a state-owned list of individuals who are very likely to own semi-automatic firearms, that’s because it is exactly that. And we mustn’t forget that creating a list of gun owners is almost always an early step in the process of confiscating arms.


The bill also grants the Sheriff what would appear to be unchecked discretion to deny or revoke these eligibility cards if the Sheriff believes that “documented previous behavior” by the applicant or cardholder makes it likely the person could present a danger to themself or others. The bill does not specify what kind of “documented previous behavior” should trigger a denial or revocation. According to the language of this bill, the only standard for denial or revocation is any particular Sheriff’s “reasonable belief” that a person should not hold an eligibility card. For all the bill tells us, the “documented previous behavior” could be something like a past Facebook post referring to the American founders’ belief that the Second Amendment ought to exist so the citizenry can defend against a tyrannical government. In any case, you can’t even get to the starting line of the series of hoops they’ll require you to jump through without a government official making a subjective judgment call on your moral character.

This is easily in the running for the worst piece of legislation we’ve ever seen, and we’ve seen a lot of bad legislation. It must be defeated.
You don’t really have to “ ban “ anything. As this does, make acquiring and owning such a colossal PITA and/ or expensive that over time most people will simply say, “ To hell with it. It’s just too much of a hassle. “ Over time, private firearms ownership will simply wither away. Mission accomplished!
 
You don’t really have to “ ban “ anything. As this does, make acquiring and owning such a colossal PITA and/ or expensive that over time most people will simply say, “ To hell with it. It’s just too much of a hassle. “ Over time, private firearms ownership will simply wither away. Mission accomplished!
Says every liberal gun hating politician ever, their end goal!

And thanks to last years approved HB24-1353 , FFL dealers must now also acquire a state firearms dealer permit at the yearly cost of $400.00, from the state beginning July 01, 2025. Ughhh:mad:
 
Beware!!
Fake Book is not a good place right now at all !!

the “documented previous behavior” could be something like a past Facebook post referring to the American founders’ belief that the Second Amendment
 
If the SCOTUS does not speak up and force states to adhere to the Bill of Rights and the Constitution then the entire US will be lost eventually. If the SCOTUS does speak up then judges who have been ruling against our rights should be impeached. The people who voted these people into power are the same people who support censorship and call the truth disinformation.
 
If the SCOTUS does not speak up and force states to adhere to the Bill of Rights and the Constitution then the entire US will be lost eventually. If the SCOTUS does speak up then judges who have been ruling against our rights should be impeached. The people who voted these people into power are the same people who support censorship and call the truth disinformation.m

As it stands right now, law makers in each state or nationwide can make laws that blatantly trample on the Bill of Rights and their is NO repercussions whatsoever!!
A judge slaps it down, end of case. Then the dirty SOBs do it all over again without penalty.
Making laws that blatantly violate the US Constitution should be illegal

Clay
 
No federal funds, including emergency disaster funds if your state. Doesn't fully comply with the constitution! Power of the purse!

Our new admin is at this time putting out fires internationally with its favored 'tool' being the threat of cutting off aid or military supply contracts, and/or re-adjusting tariffs on their goods they ship to us. Once these fires are contained, it will them start dealing with States which defy our constitution in a similar manner.
 
Our new admin is at this time putting out fires internationally with its favored 'tool' being the threat of cutting off aid or military supply contracts, and/or re-adjusting tariffs on their goods they ship to us. Once these fires are contained, it will them start dealing with States which defy our constitution in a similar manner.
I sure hope so!
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,855
Messages
2,185,251
Members
78,541
Latest member
LBanister
Back
Top