I put them in nice solid stocks of one kind or another, stress free pilar bedding, custom barrel, jewel triggers, good scope(kinda).
No action trueing of any kind...I got lucky. I got Dan to remove and time the bolts...money well spent.
RR Actions are not supposed to be that good, but mine shoot bug holes with good bbl.'s, stocks, triggers on them. I wanted to put them to a test with all the negative talk I hear, but the laws of probability will catch up to me sooner or later.
Specifically, when I can shoot groups in the low 2's, I am happy for a varmint rifle. I usually have an 8-32 or 10x50 scope on them of sorts. I shoot three shot groups, looking for tiny groups below .250, and atmospheric conditions will whip you more often than not. I hung a 31" unturned blank off one of the RR SS actionsin 6XC II, shooting palma brass it shot a lot of the smallest groups I have shot back to back in a long time with a leupold 36 on it.
I have had a lot of Hall M's, and Stolle Panda's which I really love. It feels real good doing great with lesser equipment. I have come full circle from being an all custom type guy. I kinda enjoy getting lesser equipment to shoot tiny groups, and working the crossword puzzle that goes with the "less than perfect" equipment.
I put a Hart 14 T on a tang safety Ruger 77(junk), put it in a McMillen Hunter class stock, tuned the trigger, caliber zero freebore turn neck 243 AI. First time to the range, fire forming brass in the 3's, formed brass in the low 2's with my own 70g Low drag bullet on a .900 jacket. Took me a while to digest that all I had heard had been wrong(rugers are no supposed to shoot tiny groups).
Next attempt was a Shilen 12T, heavy varmint, on a Mauser Parker Hale(mauser), in the Parker Hale varmint stock, zero freebore 6 Remington. First time to the range, I shot three groups in the 2's with Berger 62's at 4000 fps. A benchrest pal was with me, he shot it, and just stood back from the bench and laughed saying, "no way".
I must say that I am some what of a loss in the mechanical engineering of what makes the rifle extremely accurate. I tend to think at this point that the gunsmith that takes pains in getting the chamber and bore in alignment carries very heavy weight, along with the quality of the barrel it's self. I saw these RR Remingtons, Ruger tang safeties, and a Mauser all shoot incredibly small groups.
I have begun to think that there is the pure science in doing everything possible to remove all flaws from rifle action, barrel, chamber so that you have the very best chance possible to shoot the best groups of your life. Competitive shooting is harsh and demanding on ammo, gun, and shooter. Doing everything possible at gives you the confidence that You have done your best, the let the chips in competition lay where they must. A lot of your performance and potential success lies between your ears. You have to decide just how far you are going to take it.
My next project is to put a high quality barrel on a Rem 783, a 223 AI. I will put on a new boyd's stock. Then do the same thing to a Thompson bolt gun in a long action 7/08 Ackley improved. I like working cross word puzzles.
I have three Savage single shots, how they shoot as well as they do is simply a mystery of the Universe, banana shaped Cases, fonkadelic actions, with shore nuff fonky bolt heads, but they shoot. It is embarrassing for me to take one of the Savages to the rifle range, till you start shooting some groups(ugly stepchild).
Working a puzzle, doing more with less, builds confidence and satisfaction.