bobinpa
Gold $$ Contributor
You might be right on the money, and I agree that they could/should have planned better and maybe moved by now. When I read the 4th paragraph of the article, I think the attorney is grandstanding too..... but if it was as simple as not renewing a lease why would the government let it drag on for 12 years? The government could demo that building and fence the place off in a couple of days if it was completely in their right to do so but the fact that this has gone on for 12 years, leads me to believe there is some right for the club to be there and one man is trying everything he can to get rid of them. Doesn't make much difference, I just hate to see this happen to a club.IMO that reason is a lawyer looking to make $. They claim the state is "stealing this lovely place from us". Bottom line is they do not own the land. Hunting /shooting club leases are down to one year leases-gone are the days of 99 year leases. They had decades to raise funds and find private land to relocate the club so they could control their own destiny. Add to the fact that every shooting club is well aware of ranges being scrutinized and some have been closed due to lead. What were they thinking?









