In my experience the Ezell tuner is the easiest to use. This tuner has clear marks that make it easy to adjust with multiple set screws to hold it in place. I have one of Mike’s Tuners on every barrel.Looking to put a tuner in my next build. I know there are many turners out there. Just wanting too hear about what you guys are useing. What do you like the pros and cons of of each. Centerfire!
Thanks
in my experience the Ezell tuner is the easiest to use. This tuner has clear marks that make it easy to adjust with multiple set screws to hold it in place. I have one of Mike’s Tuners on every barrel.
Ben
I have three Ezell tuners. If I needed another, I would buy an Ezell PDT tuner.Looking to put a tuner in my next build. I know there are many turners out there. Just wanting too hear about what you guys are useing. What do you like the pros and cons of of each. Centerfire!
Thanks
I’m gonna go just a little bit against the grain in so much as to the going in and out of tune 3x in a small movementI have at least a half dozen each of Mike Ezell and Sid Goodling's tuners, one Jackie Schmidt, use to have a Borden, have 1 Gene Beggs and just received one of Dave Short's tuners 2 days ago. Without a doubt the Ezell tuner is by far the easiest to use in a match. The Ezell, Schmidt and Short tuners all use some form of dampening system while the other 3 do not. Mike's uses powdered Tungsten Disulfide and the Schmidt and Short use rubber. Mike's is the heaviest of the 6 at usually around 7.oz. and Dave Short's was the lightest weighing in at 3.9oz. Sid's tuners usually run 4.2 oz. In the disciple of shooting that I compete in SR score, more people have Goodling's tuner than any of them, BUT when I was at the 1-200 meter Nationals in Orangeburg, SC in October, I noticed a lot more of Mike Ezell's tuner's showing up on rifles. The Begg's and Borden tuners are the only 2 that I have that do not extend past the muzzle. Gene's is basically 2 discs and Borden's is a little over 4 oz piece of brass. They work but I like tuners that extend past the muzzle. I swear by them. I would not go to the line without one and they are so easy to use. Some people over complicate them buy moving them too much. If they moved it 1/4 turn they probably went in and out of tune at least 3 times. I've gone back in tune by moving the thing as little as a 1/16 of an inch. I am going to order two more, a Woolum and an RAS and try those 2. If I had to recommend one and one only it would be Mike Ezell's because all you have to do is turn it. There is no clockwise-counterclockwise unlocking of the 2 pieces when u have to make an adjustment.
Ok I exaggerated a little. On Mike's turner if you moved it 1/4 turn, (8 hash marks) it will go out of tune 2 times.I’m gonna go just a little bit against the grain in so much as to the going in and out of tune 3x in a small movement
If yours is doing that you may not be in the best spot
Tuner weight should be 10% of barrel weight. If that puts you over weight shorten and lighten the stock. The measurement from the bolt handle relief to the front of the stock should not be more than 500mm. Stock weight of less than 1.4kgs work very well as do 1kg.Stay tuned for a lighter version of my tuner soon. Working on them now.
That said, I still recommend a bit more weight at the tuner whenever possible. But making weight and gun balance are more important for obvious reasons.
--Mike Ezell
Tim, I have to agree with Jim here and it has little if anything to do where you are tuned, be it powder charge or tuner setting. Moving the tuner a given value will have a given result in terms of vibrational frequency. Moving it a mark in will raise the frequency and a mark out will lower it, respectively. If tuning is as I believe, about timing bullet exit to occur while the barrel is at a spot that gives best accuracy along a sine wave pattern(in simple terms), the results are predictable and no setting is wider than the next, per se. I will say that you will typically have two sweet spots on a typical sr br rifle withing about 8 marks and that the one that prints slightly higher is where I tune for, because of being more forgiving to velocity variations between rounds in a given condition. Yes, that can well mean a very slightly wider tune window but it's a subject for another thread.I’m gonna go just a little bit against the grain in so much as to the going in and out of tune 3x in a small movement
If yours is doing that you may not be in the best spot
Hey Mike. If you'll indulge me, when you are working with the tuner trying to establish best tune, are you shooting 3 shot groups, then move a mark and repeat? If not, how are you going about it?
Ok. I won't disagree but what science do you have to support those numbers? And yes, I like a heavier tuner BECAUSE it lowers the frequency of vibration, which does in turn, widen the sweet spot. Everything is just slower.Tuner weight should be 10% of barrel weight. If that puts you over weight shorten and lighten the stock. The measurement from the bolt handle relief to the front of the stock should not be more than 500mm. Stock weight of less than 1.4kgs work very well as do 1kg.