If you are popping primers and getting head swipes it is NOT the primers it is your load expanding the case head. CCI 41 is not exactly the same as CCI450.I'm having horrible problems with the CCI #41s which are the same primer. They're popping out, and swiping case heads badly in .223/5.56mm known loads.... even on fairly reduced versions of the same load.
I tried switching to Ball Powder (TAC) to get a slower burn rate and a ball powder, and even at modest velocity, the heads swipe a little, and a few will show the primer backing out of the brass.
These primers are used for mixed brass bulk target ammo, so the massive SDs aren't a deal breaker, but jamming up my fire control group with popped primers sucks.
I've spent way too many weeks trying to get an acceptable load for these awful primers. I've never had a component give me so much trouble.
![]()
First time out was about 25 degrees warmer and had no issues.I've had failure to fire with CCI450's in a Barnard, Remington, and RPA action. Most FTF were in colder weather, they seem to work fine in warm weather. I've heard many reports of the same thing.
Could be. Im going to check shoulder bump tonight. Also those 2 in the picture were tried 5 times i think. They were not that deep cratered untill after 4th try. Firts attempt looked lile a normal strike.Looking at your primer hits, it really looks to me like a headspace issue.
I know these are not jammed loads but not sure how much of a jump. I dont have a tap to make a modified case but a friend does. Ill get one made. When my gunsmith fitted the barrel he asked for sized brass and a bullet seated to 2.260 so thats what ive been loading the rounds to. Ill give a case to my friend andd have him thread it.The only time I’ve had a CCI 450 to fail is fire forming and that didn’t have anything to do with the primer it was the lack of bullet jam.
I fired thousands of them.
^^This^^ I've never, ever had a primer fail to ignite in the tens of thousands of rounds that I have loaded over the years ( hope I don't jinx myself). I have shot 30+ year old primers and still no issue UNTIL years ago- I saw an article (on this site) about primer seating depth and accuracy. So, I took my trusty 6br to the range and started to experiment with primer seating depth. Normally, I go full crush and bottom out my priming tool. For the test, I started backing off in .002 thou increments and at .006 to .008 from the bottom, guess what? Click- no bang. every second or third one. Accuracy went out the window too so I went back to fully seating and I've never looked back. It wasn't for me. Just my .02 cents.Also, if they eventually go off after trying them a couple of times, that usually points to the fact that they were not seated fully to begin with
The primers are the only variable. I've spent no less than 10 range sessions testing these things. Yes.. obviously the output charge is the cause of the swiping. But the primers are massively altering the burn rate on 4 different powders that I have tested. H322, Varget, TAC, and IMR 3031If you are popping primers and getting head swipes it is NOT the primers it is your load expanding the case head. CCI 41 is not exactly the same as CCI450.
I would deduce, from the photo you posted, this is not a true statement.The primers are the only variable........
I would have to think they are seated all the way. I seat them untill ram stops moving. No more resistance than what i do on all my other cartridges. I compared depth with the 6x45 with a 223. Same case. Same depth. Never had this type of issue till this cartridge and these primers.^^This^^ I've never, ever had a primer fail to ignite in the tens of thousands of rounds that I have loaded over the years ( hope I don't jinx myself). I have shot 30+ year old primers and still no issue UNTIL years ago- I saw an article (on this site) about primer seating depth and accuracy. So, I took my trusty 6br to the range and started to experiment with primer seating depth. Normally, I go full crush and bottom out my priming tool. For the test, I started backing off in .002 thou increments and at .006 to .008 from the bottom, guess what? Click- no bang. every second or third one. Accuracy went out the window too so I went back to fully seating and I've never looked back. It wasn't for me. Just my .02 cents.
Dan
Military brass primer pocket depth can be all over the place. Best to use a primer pocket uniforming cutter to insure they are all the same so that the the firing pin travel is consistent.I would deduce, from the photo you posted, this is not a true statement.
That pic has several different brands of brass and even appears there may be a mix of commercial and military brass.
No saying you don't have a primer issue but quite possibly there are other contributing factors.
I'm starting to think that this may be a wise thing to do if you're going to use the small rifle magnum primers. I'm sure consistent seating against the bottom of the pocket will help things regardless of what brass or caliber you're using.Military brass primer pocket depth can be all over the place. Best to use a primer pocket uniforming cutter to insure they are all the same so that the the firing pin travel is consistent.
If not primer.......
Head clearance issue/cartridge headspacing.
After opening the necks to 6mm, all rounds fired, first firing? With CCI450?
The Savage Axis extractor allows a lot of forward movement of the cartridge on firing. If the shoulder has been set back a lot from to much sizing, may be an issue.
Size brass, so there is a slight crush fit when chambering a round.
My 223 Axis had a misfire using CCI 400 primer. Just 1.
What i learned from this misfire is... The firing pin strike can set the case shoulder back .006" The 2nd strike makes the head to datum measurement, ever shorter.
Tested a few times.
So, the more times you try to fire a bad primer, the futher away it gets from the firing pin. More cartridge slop in the chamber.