• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Captain Clay Higgins

What purpose is this serving?

Since when is it appropriate for law enforcement to make statements regarding innocence or guilt of the accused in open cases?

Law enforcement’s job is to arrest. I am more comfortable with the judicial system prosecuting and convicting, after a fair trial by a jury of one’s peers. However, it is certainly more expedient to do away with due process and the presumption of innocence.
 
What purpose is this serving?

Since when is it appropriate for law enforcement to make statements regarding innocence or guilt of the accused in open cases?

Law enforcement’s job is to arrest. I am more comfortable with the judicial system prosecuting and convicting, after a fair trial by a jury of one’s peers. However, it is certainly more expedient to do away with due process and the presumption of innocence.
Oh come on!
I’m sure this Captain knows what he’s talking about on these criminal acts. Look at all of the people standing behind him that are supporting getting these killers off the streets
 
What purpose is this serving?

Since when is it appropriate for law enforcement to make statements regarding innocence or guilt of the accused in open cases?

Law enforcement’s job is to arrest. I am more comfortable with the judicial system prosecuting and convicting, after a fair trial by a jury of one’s peers. However, it is certainly more expedient to do away with due process and the presumption of innocence.
Really?
 
What purpose is this serving?

Since when is it appropriate for law enforcement to make statements regarding innocence or guilt of the accused in open cases?

Law enforcement’s job is to arrest. I am more comfortable with the judicial system prosecuting and convicting, after a fair trial by a jury of one’s peers. However, it is certainly more expedient to do away with due process and the presumption of innocence.
Totally agree
Sad to say he’s from my home state, this dude is an idiot and a poser of the first degree
Here’s his back story
He was a used car salesman who fell in politically with the sheriff of st Landry parish. Supposedly owes a bunch of back child support or alimony as well
He’s not a “ tough guy” nor does he have any street or LEO experience , just a mouthpiece
FYI these videos and other dumb things he did got him terminated from ST Landry but enough people believed his tough guy act and voted him into congress

So he’s right where he belongs , with the other liars and deadbeats.
 
Totally agree
Sad to say he’s from my home state, this dude is an idiot and a poser of the first degree
Here’s his back story
He was a used car salesman who fell in politically with the sheriff of st Landry parish. Supposedly owes a bunch of back child support or alimony as well
He’s not a “ tough guy” nor does he have any street or LEO experience , just a mouthpiece
FYI these videos and other dumb things he did got him terminated from ST Landry but enough people believed his tough guy act and voted him into congress

So he’s right where he belongs , with the other liars and deadbeats.
That makes sense. He will fit right in.
 
What purpose is this serving?

Since when is it appropriate for law enforcement to make statements regarding innocence or guilt of the accused in open cases?

Law enforcement’s job is to arrest. I am more comfortable with the judicial system prosecuting and convicting, after a fair trial by a jury of one’s peers. However, it is certainly more expedient to do away with due process and the presumption of innocence.

Yep. He needs to become more woke....:cool:

They'll have the FBI after him soon.
 
What purpose is this serving?

Since when is it appropriate for law enforcement to make statements regarding innocence or guilt of the accused in open cases?

Law enforcement’s job is to arrest. I am more comfortable with the judicial system prosecuting and convicting, after a fair trial by a jury of one’s peers. However, it is certainly more expedient to do away with due process and the presumption of innocence.
Well ...... after living with a 2 tier (really 3 now) justice system, people are tired and fed up with the way things have been going.

Hold people accountable for their actions and don't release them because some judge/political person or agenda/organization (etc.) thinks they are misunderstood or disadvantaged or are discriminated against.

People want to live in a moral, civilized society and see this video as a step towards getting there, due to all the BS that has been pushed upon us in the recent past.
 
Well ...... after living with a 2 tier (really 3 now) justice system, people are tired and fed up with the way things have been going.

Hold people accountable for their actions and don't release them because some judge/political person or agenda/organization (etc.) thinks they are misunderstood or disadvantaged or are discriminated against.

People want to live in a moral, civilized society and see this video as a step towards getting there, due to all the BS that has been pushed upon us in the recent past.
I totally agree. But what you describe about the system is not new. Those with money or power have always been afforded benefits.

We must never forget that all of the rights set out in our Constitution are important and non negotiable, not just our 2nd Amendment rights. Less we have the police kicking in our doors in the name of their self executing justice.
 
I totally agree. But what you describe about the system is not new. Those with money or power have always been afforded benefits.

We must never forget that all of the rights set out in our Constitution are important and non negotiable, not just our 2nd Amendment rights. Less we have the police kicking in our doors in the name of their self executing justice.
I think those thugs lost their rights when they broke the law themselves raping and killing.
 
What purpose is this serving?

Since when is it appropriate for law enforcement to make statements regarding innocence or guilt of the accused in open cases?

Law enforcement’s job is to arrest. I am more comfortable with the judicial system prosecuting and convicting, after a fair trial by a jury of one’s peers. However, it is certainly more expedient to do away with due process and the presumption of innocence.
if James Comey could exonerate Hillary over 100 actual violations of the law, why can't this guy?
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,875
Messages
2,185,528
Members
78,541
Latest member
LBanister
Back
Top