Oh come on!What purpose is this serving?
Since when is it appropriate for law enforcement to make statements regarding innocence or guilt of the accused in open cases?
Law enforcement’s job is to arrest. I am more comfortable with the judicial system prosecuting and convicting, after a fair trial by a jury of one’s peers. However, it is certainly more expedient to do away with due process and the presumption of innocence.
Really?What purpose is this serving?
Since when is it appropriate for law enforcement to make statements regarding innocence or guilt of the accused in open cases?
Law enforcement’s job is to arrest. I am more comfortable with the judicial system prosecuting and convicting, after a fair trial by a jury of one’s peers. However, it is certainly more expedient to do away with due process and the presumption of innocence.
Totally agreeWhat purpose is this serving?
Since when is it appropriate for law enforcement to make statements regarding innocence or guilt of the accused in open cases?
Law enforcement’s job is to arrest. I am more comfortable with the judicial system prosecuting and convicting, after a fair trial by a jury of one’s peers. However, it is certainly more expedient to do away with due process and the presumption of innocence.
That makes sense. He will fit right in.Totally agree
Sad to say he’s from my home state, this dude is an idiot and a poser of the first degree
Here’s his back story
He was a used car salesman who fell in politically with the sheriff of st Landry parish. Supposedly owes a bunch of back child support or alimony as well
He’s not a “ tough guy” nor does he have any street or LEO experience , just a mouthpiece
FYI these videos and other dumb things he did got him terminated from ST Landry but enough people believed his tough guy act and voted him into congress
So he’s right where he belongs , with the other liars and deadbeats.
What purpose is this serving?
Since when is it appropriate for law enforcement to make statements regarding innocence or guilt of the accused in open cases?
Law enforcement’s job is to arrest. I am more comfortable with the judicial system prosecuting and convicting, after a fair trial by a jury of one’s peers. However, it is certainly more expedient to do away with due process and the presumption of innocence.
Well ...... after living with a 2 tier (really 3 now) justice system, people are tired and fed up with the way things have been going.What purpose is this serving?
Since when is it appropriate for law enforcement to make statements regarding innocence or guilt of the accused in open cases?
Law enforcement’s job is to arrest. I am more comfortable with the judicial system prosecuting and convicting, after a fair trial by a jury of one’s peers. However, it is certainly more expedient to do away with due process and the presumption of innocence.
I totally agree. But what you describe about the system is not new. Those with money or power have always been afforded benefits.Well ...... after living with a 2 tier (really 3 now) justice system, people are tired and fed up with the way things have been going.
Hold people accountable for their actions and don't release them because some judge/political person or agenda/organization (etc.) thinks they are misunderstood or disadvantaged or are discriminated against.
People want to live in a moral, civilized society and see this video as a step towards getting there, due to all the BS that has been pushed upon us in the recent past.
I think those thugs lost their rights when they broke the law themselves raping and killing.I totally agree. But what you describe about the system is not new. Those with money or power have always been afforded benefits.
We must never forget that all of the rights set out in our Constitution are important and non negotiable, not just our 2nd Amendment rights. Less we have the police kicking in our doors in the name of their self executing justice.
if James Comey could exonerate Hillary over 100 actual violations of the law, why can't this guy?What purpose is this serving?
Since when is it appropriate for law enforcement to make statements regarding innocence or guilt of the accused in open cases?
Law enforcement’s job is to arrest. I am more comfortable with the judicial system prosecuting and convicting, after a fair trial by a jury of one’s peers. However, it is certainly more expedient to do away with due process and the presumption of innocence.