I have two of Jim's "Fine Shootin' Rifles"I've seen a lot of post in this section for a lot of the smaller caliber cartridges, but none have been about Calhoon's 19 caliber. Anybody here have any experience with any of them, either pro or con?
That said I think the biggest issues were a combination of not really any bullet makers, nor loading die makers or barrel makers, especially bullet makers really jumped on board to give the 19's critical mass in spite of the fact they are pretty well thought out designs.
Such is the world of sub caliber experimentation. You go over to the Saubier site and see some of the stuff.....some gains traction, some fades.
Not that long ago guys were really pushing the envelope, try and find .12 cal or .10 cal barrels or bullets these days. With all the various chamberings in .14, when Bill Eichelberger died, they're barely hanging on.
I have one of the 10 Coopers made in 14 Walker but who today is gonna drop $350 for a complete set of dies......to go with your $75 cleaning rod.
14 Walker would be nice, especially in a Cooper. For me, sub caliber starts at 19 and goes down. Nothing wrong with a 20. I want one. I just think that with the 204 Ruger being so popular and mainstream and very close to 22, that sub caliber is below that.
Danny
Calhoon definitely had the right idea but big companies with big bucks added 0.006", said the 20 caliber was the way, the truth and the light and the sheep followed.