I am in somewhat of a quandry and need some advise. Here's my story. Just starting out in Benchrest shooting,just got a rifle, dies, tools,etc.,etc., have a 6PPC w/.262 neck, Wilson seater, Newlon FL bushing die. Also have a Lee collet die and seater which I purchased because that is what I am used to using on all my other rifles. I've turned the necks, sized, loaded and fire formed about 65 pcs of Lapua 220 Russian brass. Ok, ready to start over and begin getting serious about tuning. Here's my question, why use a bushing in the FL sizer vs a collet die that squeezes the neck down to a fitted mandrel? If I understand all of this, we're attempting to achieve consistent neck tension, is that right? How does the neck bushing do that by sizing the outside and moving most of the variance to the inside?
I know I can make brass with a more consistent wall thickness than the factory brass and that is a good thing, but it is not perfect. From what I've seen, the inside dia. is not consistent after outside turning and can easily be larger/smaller near the neck/shoulder junction - there is nothing to make it otherwise. Thinner seems to make sense to me as the thinner the wall the less impact wall thickness variance creates, may not be the real reason but is the only thing I can think of. Now, since the O.D. is not perfect, the bushing is going to push all imperfections to the inside where the bullet is going to see them on its way in, I think. By the same logic it seems, to me anyway, the Lee collet die would take these 'good' things one step farther by sizing the inside diameter to a known dimension while simultaneously making the walls of the neck cylinder parallel. This should improve concentricity, neck tension and runout consistency. Having said all that, I suspect, as usual, that I am missing something somewhere. Folks with a lot more experience than me are using the neck turning/bushing approach and getting some pretty outstanding results, so it makes sense to me that there must be a reason or something that I am not seeing or getting. I don't have a problem doing things either way, I am just hoping someone may have tried both methodologies at a competitive level and can steer me straight or give me some insight. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Barry
I know I can make brass with a more consistent wall thickness than the factory brass and that is a good thing, but it is not perfect. From what I've seen, the inside dia. is not consistent after outside turning and can easily be larger/smaller near the neck/shoulder junction - there is nothing to make it otherwise. Thinner seems to make sense to me as the thinner the wall the less impact wall thickness variance creates, may not be the real reason but is the only thing I can think of. Now, since the O.D. is not perfect, the bushing is going to push all imperfections to the inside where the bullet is going to see them on its way in, I think. By the same logic it seems, to me anyway, the Lee collet die would take these 'good' things one step farther by sizing the inside diameter to a known dimension while simultaneously making the walls of the neck cylinder parallel. This should improve concentricity, neck tension and runout consistency. Having said all that, I suspect, as usual, that I am missing something somewhere. Folks with a lot more experience than me are using the neck turning/bushing approach and getting some pretty outstanding results, so it makes sense to me that there must be a reason or something that I am not seeing or getting. I don't have a problem doing things either way, I am just hoping someone may have tried both methodologies at a competitive level and can steer me straight or give me some insight. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Barry