Albany Mountain
Silver $$ Contributor
take the lightest, most accurate rifle of your choices.
Sorry, the 6.5-300 doesn't have the pop of a 300mag by any measure you can think of.That 6.5 300 sounds like the ticket to me. The B.C. of the .264 bullet and the pop of a 300 mag. Whats there to argue about. The only elk I ever killed was with a .308 in a TC encore pistol. Only thing I could shoot at the time due to a car wreck. I would have felt better with one of my white trash weatherbys. Doug
Sorry, I was't being serious. I've been on 15 sheep hunts and my favorite rifle was a med weight .300 mag of some version with a 200gr bullet at 2900-3000. Good long, short, timber, open country. Especially good if you saw a bear, elk, moose or goat.I didnt mean muzzle energy . I meant the case under the bullet. Scuze my wording. Doug
The lightest one…the one you shoot the bestDrew a Colorado bighorn tag in a rather nasty unit. Would compare to the Frank Church in Idaho. Must be partially insane, but looking forward to the trip. Thought about buying another gun as a reward but decided otherwise. Choices are as follows:
1. 25-06 in a Sendero with good 4-16 Vortex scope.
2. 6.5 Creedmoor in Kimber
The Berger 185 Elite Hunters are equally effective!Maybe try a different bullet in the 300wsm?
Rumor has it a 185gr juggernaut is devastating on game.
Drew a Colorado bighorn tag in a rather nasty unit. Would compare to the Frank Church in Idaho. Must be partially insane, but looking forward to the trip. Thought about buying another gun as a reward but decided otherwise. Choices are as follows:
1. 25-06 in a Sendero with good 4-16 Vortex scope.
2. 6.5 Creedmoor in Kimber
There's nothing wrong with a 6.5 CM, but the only reason its so popular is because of the huge marketing campaign behind it. Is it better than a good 308? Kinda. Less recoil, a LITTLE bit better ballistics but doesn't hit as hard when it gets there. It's less recoil, and the cartridge specs are based on today's manufacturing capabilities and tolerances rather than what was possible to mass produce in the 1950s. The practical advantage of those benifits, however, is pretty minimal IMHO. Personally, I wouldn't take a 6.5 CM on a hunt where I wanted to be able to shoot big game past 300-400 yds. It's not that it can't do the job, its that there are so many better options including most of your list.Originally I hadn't given the Creedmoor any thought until I was visiting with the outfitter's wife. She said that she and their daughter had both used a Creedmoor on their own sheep hunts. My research tells me that the Creedmoor is good to 6-700 yards which is further than I want to shoot short of a pure long range shooting gun. I need to get some more trigger time behind several of those guns. Weight isn't everything but I'm not going to carry an extra 4 or 5 lbs if I have a lighter weight gun that will get the job done. Easiest solution is to get the 7PRC shooting well and call it good. I have some work to do before I say yes or no to several of these choices. The advice that I am getting from the outfitters that I have talked to is to take the one you are most confident in using.