• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Berger 185 and 200 grain Hybrid Bullets

Keith Glasscock

Gold $$ Contributor
Testing the Berger Hybrid bullets – 185 gr and 200 gr

Equipment:

All shots fired were chronographed with a CED M2 chronograph.

One rifle was used for the entire testing program. It is a Savage long action with a 26” 1 in 11 twist Benchmark 3-groove barrel. The barrel had 1300 rounds fired at the beginning of testing. This rifle is a proven performer that gives groups as small as .35” at 300 yards with Berger 155.5 Fullbore bullets and 47.0 grains of Varget. All shooting was done from the bipod. Temperatures were between 70 and 80 degrees at an elevation of 200’ MSL. Shooting was done over several days, but tests were repeated to verify results when necessary.

CAUTION: All loads shown were fired in my rifle with roomy Winchester brass. They were rather hot in mine, and could be completely unsafe in other rifles. EVERY shooter should WORK UP their loads CAREFULLY!

Bullets were sampled and weighed to .1 grain for range only.
185 grain: 185.1 – 184.9
200 grain: 200.2 – 199.8

First test was to work up charges of Varget to determine the maximum pressure load.

All rounds loaded with .010” jump (approx 2.997” OAL). Chronograph positioned 14’ from muzzle

185 Gr:
43.5 -- 2663fps
44.0 -- 2700fps - primer getting flat
44.4 -- 2711fps - primer flat - Usable Max
44.6 -- 2720fps - slight ejector mark
44.8 -- 2728fps - slightly bigger ejector mark
45.0 -- 2731fps - shiny ejector mark – this is beyond max

200 gr:
42.2 -- 2563fps
42.6 -- 2577fps
43.0 -- 2594fps
43.2 -- 2599fps - primer flattening – Usable Max
43.4 -- 2606fps - slight hint of ejector mark
43.6 -- 2616fps - slight ejector mark – this is absolute max
Note: the entire series from 42.6 to 43.6 grains resulted in one ragged hole at 200 yards. Group size was .372" for the 5 shots

Second test – 10 shot grouping at 300yards: (all group sizes measured in vertical only)

185 gr: Out of node!

44.4 Varget .010 jump – 1.424” -- ES 36, SD 10.7

200 gr:
43.2 Varget .010 jump -- .575” – ES 10, SD 4.1 – 5 shot group also fired (different day) - .480”
43.2 Varget .030 jump – test compromised by very bad mirage -- .976” – no chrono data




Third test – 600 yard league match.

Load:

200 gr Hybrid, 43.2 Varget, BR-2, .010 jump, 3x fired Winchester brass weighing 157.2-157.4 grains, bullets sorted by weight.

Conditions:
Tri-County Gun Club is known for swirling conditions. When the wind blows, things get very difficult in a hurry. In addition to difficult to read wind direction, topographic features result in significant vertical deflection of bullets. This range is the reason I started using heavy bullets for f-class shooting.

The wind was blowing 5-10 mph during the match and the direction was swinging wildly from 6 O’clock to 1 O’clock - the long way around. Both wind flags and daisy wheels were present on the range and they spun around and around relentlessly during second half of the string.

Targets were SR-3 type. The rings were redrawn to MR-1FC standards for scores reported herein.

Results:

Range conditions presented a significant amount of noise in the data. After the second sighter, the first 10 shots for record were fired for “group”. The group was considered primary for this target, and thus vertical impact point was held throughout the string even though it was not centered.

The load printed a group that had a vertical component of 2” with doubled and tripled holes. The score was a paltry 194-3x with the group center approximately 0.5” below the bottom of the X ring. All lost points were to wind. Superimposing the group over the center of the bull gave a theoretical X-count increase to 7X. Despite the low score, mine was the highest of the night.

During my string, I noticed several times that I gained points due to the lesser wind deflection of the heavy bullet. My competitors (shooting 155's and 175's) were hitting 9’s while I was hitting 10’s and 8’s when I’d get a 9.

Overall impressions of the 185 and 200 grain Hybrid bullets:

The 185 is a good bullet. Unfortunately, I don’t have enough barrel length (26") to safely get it to the 2720+ velocity node with Varget. I do not have a suitable powder available right now (RL17) to get it up there safely. Although it is outside the node, accuracy of sub half MOA was easy to obtain. Unfortunately, half-minute accuracy is no longer good enough in F-class shooting. With Varget, I would have to back it down to 2610 fps, and that would be a waste. The performance gains would be minimal compared to other bullets available (specifically the 200). Even though I wasn’t able to get into the node with this barrel and powder, I think that this would be an optimal bullet for a 30” or longer barrel.

The 200gr Hybrid exceeded all of my expectations. The vertical precision is far better than any other “heavy” bullet I have used or tested. The wind deflection appears to be equal to or better than the 210 vld. While the 155 Fullbore gives amazing precision, the 200 gr Hybrid almost matches it and has a significant advantage in retained velocity and wind deflection. With my current load, 1000 yard competition is possible with a 26” barrel.

I’d like to thank Berger Bullets for including me in this testing. It is an honor to get to help out.

Keith Glasscock

P.S. I’ve shot nearly all of the 200gr hybrids I received and would like more of them. It is now my go-to bullet for this rifle in difficult conditions.
 
Keith,

this looks very encouraging! ...... and thank you for posting such a detailed description of your results with these bullets. One question. Your 2.997" COAL is pretty long and suggests the bullets are not too deeply seated in the case. How much freebore does your chamber provide? (I don't expect a particular figure, rather an indication of how the Hybrid stacks up against other bullets in this respect, and/or whether the chamber was throated for any particular bullet previously.)

With these being very long bullets (185: 1.435"; 200: 1.5" according to Bryan Litz's drawings in Applied Ballistics for Long Range Shooting 2nd ed) a 2.997" COAL minus 2.010" case length sees nearly an inch of bullet outside of the the case. With the .308W's neck being 0.303" nominal length, I reckon the 185 only intruded 0.145" below the shoulder-neck junction; the 200gn 0.210", virtually ideal in the latter case - the boat-tail section only below the neck - if I've done my sums right!

It's also very interesting that the 200 performed so well with a 1-11" twist barrel. On the basis of Bryan L's data, this looks like one 0.308" bullet that does need a 1-10", other 200-210gn models being being better suited to the 11" rate.

I'm certainly looking forward to getting these bullets over here in the UK once they go into production.


Laurie,
York, England
 
Laurie,

I couldn't get the 185 hybrids to work as well as the 185 Long Range in my GA Precision Hospitaller due to the longer bullet length and my short chamber freebore (GAP throats for 175 Sierra's). Loaded to a max magazine length of 2.885 the bullet was pretty deep in the case reaching pressure quickly. Even seated out further to single load the hybrid in my rifle didn't shoot as well as the 185 Long Range.
I never go by what primers and ejector marks look like instead I favor measuring new brass at the web then checking after the first and subsequent firings. I don't want to see any more than .001 on the first firing and then no more than another .0005 after that. I think the Hybrids need a chamber throated for them and also to be single loaded since the max mag length of AI magazines is 2.900.
I also tested the new 175 grain OTM Tactical bullet and all I can say is that bullet really groups well seated at mag length. In all my testing going head to head against the Sierra 175 grain Match King the Berger OTM blew the Sierra away at all yardages on every day I shot the two to compare them. Fantastic bullet.
In the wind the 185's rule, but when conditions are reasonable the OTM is a great bullet.

Danny
 
Hi Laurie,

Yes, indeed I have a long throat in my rifle. It is long enough that the 155.5 fullbore bullet has about .125" of bearing surface in the neck at .020 jump. OAL on the 155.5 bullet runs 2.973"

My reamer print shows a .0917" freebore, but the important number is the distance from the bolt face - 2.1342" It is a compromise chamber.

I like this chamber quite a bit except for the neck diameter. With Winchester brass, my cases expand from .332" (loaded) to .343" and the brass doesn't last as long as I'd like. The positive side is that I can shoot any 308 ammunition I come across without having to worry about neck diameter.

My real surprise with the 200 gr hybrid is the simplicity of tuning and the ability to make an underdeveloped rifle (short barreled) shoot well at 1000 yards. Up to this point, I have not been able to build a load that would arrive at 1000 yards without being transonic for quite a distance. I can't wait for my first opportunity to try them out at 1000.

For reference, my 155.5 load chronos 2941 (SD is 6) and I have an additional 1.2 grains of powder that I can safely run. A 208 Amax makes 2550 without too much pressure (Varget). I don't have good chrono data from any other bullets yet. I only recently obtained my CED.

I've been putting off starting load work with RL-17 and 210 grain bullets for quite some time. I am just lazy enough to want a load that I don't have to think about temperature, but I have a bag of the JLK 210 long boattail bullets. I can't get enough veolcity with Varget, but RL-17 should get me to 2610 without too much difficulty. If it works, and Mr. Litz's data is correct, they could be quite a powerhouse in difficult conditions (if the shooter can withstand the recoil).
 
Danny,

I think we are seeing a certain parting of the ways between the single-shot .308W user and the 'tactical' etc user who needs to load from a magazine. (Likewise .223 Rem too of course, maybe even more so for this cartridge.) As both types of user look for ever better ballistics within the limits that their courses of fire and equipment set, we're seeing longer and longer plus heavier bullets for the single-shot user, cleverly designed shorter models for the magazine shooter. IF the 185 and 200gn Hybrids group really well and IF they can be driven fast - which looks a good possibility given their relatively short bearing surfaces - I reckon they will become the bullets to beat in F/TR from next year.

A number of top F/TR shooters here in the UK have got two rifles now, usually same spec except for barrel twist rate and chamber freebore. They'll shoot the slow twist short-throat barrel with 155s if the conditions look reasonable; the fast twist, long-throat version with 210s if it's rough. Why not use 210s all the time with their ballistic advantage? They just don't seem to group as well as the 155s for some reason. The Match Rifle (1,000 - 1,200yd) shooters have gone for the 208/210s in a big way, but they shoot on larger targets, double the Bull-ring diameter of the modified Palma design used in F Class. I'm relatively unusual in liking the Berger 185 BTLR for all ranges and conditions.

I'm intrigued by the 200gn Hybrid and intend to take a chance by building a rifle around it for next year - a risk as this is a bullet that very likely won't get over here until after the league season starts, maybe not at all during 2012! I need to know how it stacks up freebore-wise in advance to order a reamer that optimises the chamber form, but which will hopefully suit other bullets too.

I'm also interested to hear your feedback on the 175gn OTM Tactical. This model hasn't got here yet, but I have a couple of hundred on order to give them a whirl. If they arrive before my presently .308W Barnard / Eliseo tubegun goes off to the gunsmith to be reborn in 6.5X47L, I'll try some at M118LR type MVs later this year and if I find a load that groups well will use them in a 900 or 1,000yd competition to see how they perform at 2,600 or so from my 1-10" twist barrel. I started my F/TR shooting some years back with 175 SMKs in a 24" barrel FN Special Police Rifle - great combination at short ranges; still good at 800 if the wind was steady; 'iffy' at 900; and Oh Dear!
at 1,000yd!
 
Keith,

thank you for that information - very useful.

Like you, I'm currently running a compromise chamber - ideal for the 185gn Berger BTLR and longer 155s, too short for the 210s. It is a 30" tube though. I can get the 208gn Hornady and 210gn Bergers to the 2,600 fps level in it, which is a bit (no, let's cut to the chase, a lot!) down on what some people are shooting them at from properly throated 30-34-inchers.

I've found it very difficult to get consistent 0.5-MOA groups with the two Bergers, gave up on the 210 SMK as it's seated far, far too deep in the case, and have had best results to date with the 208gn A-Max - but even so, not as small groups as I expect from 155s and the 175/185gn Berger BTLR designs.

FWIW, I've given up on large primer brass for the 200+ gn bullets. Lapua Palma brass, CCI-BR4, and Re17 gives high MVs and small ES values - large primer brass sees excessive pressures at ariund 50 fps down on the Palma version with all powders. You can run these cases with MVs that blow primers in standard brass - it's not just an issue of them taking what many claim are over-pressures better, I increasingly think they change the nature of the burn so you get higher MVs without exceeding sensible pressures. All serious heavy bullet F/TR shooters in the UK use these cases now, but nearly everybody else uses Viht N550 with 210s. I've found Re17 much superior - but only with 208/210s. The 185 Berger in either type of case saw Re17 produces very high MVs, but poor ES values and groups sizes, in my rifle at any rate.

Don't use the small primer brass in cold weather though. Somewhere below 10C (50F) and above 2 or 3C (c 35F) their performance deteriorates significantly. I don't know exactly where the boundary is, but know that the same loads work at 10C but not 3C, having tried them last November and again in summer. (Well our so-called summer - 10 deg C in late July / early August!)
 
Laurie,

Who makes your reamers? If you are buying them from a US manufacturer, I'd be happy to send them a sample bullet for you.

I don't live far from PTG and can get a sample bullet or two down to Dave in a day-maybe two.

It might be better than guessing.
 
Who makes your reamers? If you are buying them from a US manufacturer, I'd be happy to send them a sample bullet for you.

I don't live far from PTG and can get a sample bullet or two down to Dave in a day-maybe two.

Keith,

we've used PT&G up to now, but have run into what seems to be an insuperable problem. Vince Bottomley whom I co-operate with on these issues and does the gunsmithing on these project rifles (like me, he's a gun writer, but is also a talented 'hobby gunsmith') put in a couple of reamer orders last autumn for custom versions of 6.5 Creedmoor (small dia. neck and particular throat length) and a 6BR-DX reamer whose throat is based on the 88gn Berger HBC-FB seated to base of the neck.

No word by Christmas 2010 and email correspondence with PT&G suggested the order had been mislaid. Since then still no reamers, no answers to emails either. Vince recently saw a post on Benchrest Central giving a new name and contact details for export order handling. Emailed this guy - no response! Vince isn't the sort of guy who rants and bangs the table - he's been patient and polite throughout. We just don't know what's happening with any order with PT&G now. We've been strongly advised by others over here to use Dave Manson who has a good reputation as I understand it, but a custom chamber reamer costs around $200 which is stiff!

Vince is off to France tomorrow to compete with the British team in the World Benchrest Championship meeting. When he returns, I'll talk to him again re the BR-DX reamer and what we do for next year's .308W. (We've given up on the Creedmoor and are just getting an off the shelf standard SAAMI version elsewhere.) I should be able to get hold of a sample bullet later this year through the good efforts of some of my fellow Brit F Classers who compete in the SOA matches at Raton, but your offer of help is much appreciated. What we'll probably do once we have a bullet is to use an existing minimum SAAMI short-throat PT&G reamer with a separate throating operation to suit the Hybrid.

Mind you, both the stock and the action being used in this rifle - both ready for MANY months now - are still in the USA too while the export agent being used employed to get them and a large load of other stuff to the UK gets the necessary licenses sorted! I do have a barrel - but it came from New Zealand. Your government is apparently repeating all the mistakes that ours did in the latter days of Empire thinking that the foreigners will always buy irrespective of how badly we treat them - which is why we have damn all manufacturing industry now and the French, Germans, Chinese and Japanese amongst others have all the markets we once dominated sown up!

Laurie
 
Laurie
Did you call Dave or Kathleen at PT&G or just e-mail them? I ask only because those are the two people there that shine when it comes to reamers.The other girls just answer the phones is my experience.
Is it lost at PT&G an Exporter,the Mail or in Customs?
You can PM me off forum and I can help you out on the shipping if that is the problem.
Lynn
 
Busdriver said:
Testing the Berger Hybrid bullets – 185 gr and 200 gr

Equipment:

All shots fired were chronographed with a CED M2 chronograph.

One rifle was used for the entire testing program. It is a Savage long action with a 26” 1 in 11 twist Benchmark 3-groove barrel. The barrel had 1300 rounds fired at the beginning of testing. This rifle is a proven performer that gives groups as small as .35” at 300 yards with Berger 155.5 Fullbore bullets and 47.0 grains of Varget. All shooting was done from the bipod. Temperatures were between 70 and 80 degrees at an elevation of 200’ MSL. Shooting was done over several days, but tests were repeated to verify results when necessary.

CAUTION: All loads shown were fired in my rifle with roomy Winchester brass. They were rather hot in mine, and could be completely unsafe in other rifles. EVERY shooter should WORK UP their loads CAREFULLY!

Bullets were sampled and weighed to .1 grain for range only.
185 grain: 185.1 – 184.9
200 grain: 200.2 – 199.8

First test was to work up charges of Varget to determine the maximum pressure load.

All rounds loaded with .010” jump (approx 2.997” OAL). Chronograph positioned 14’ from muzzle

185 Gr:
43.5 -- 2663fps
44.0 -- 2700fps - primer getting flat
44.4 -- 2711fps - primer flat - Usable Max
44.6 -- 2720fps - slight ejector mark
44.8 -- 2728fps - slightly bigger ejector mark
45.0 -- 2731fps - shiny ejector mark – this is beyond max

200 gr:
42.2 -- 2563fps
42.6 -- 2577fps
43.0 -- 2594fps
43.2 -- 2599fps - primer flattening – Usable Max
43.4 -- 2606fps - slight hint of ejector mark
43.6 -- 2616fps - slight ejector mark – this is absolute max
Note: the entire series from 42.6 to 43.6 grains resulted in one ragged hole at 200 yards. Group size was .372" for the 5 shots

Second test – 10 shot grouping at 300yards: (all group sizes measured in vertical only)

185 gr: Out of node!

44.4 Varget .010 jump – 1.424” -- ES 36, SD 10.7

200 gr:
43.2 Varget .010 jump -- .575” – ES 10, SD 4.1 – 5 shot group also fired (different day) - .480”
43.2 Varget .030 jump – test compromised by very bad mirage -- .976” – no chrono data




Third test – 600 yard league match.

Load:

200 gr Hybrid, 43.2 Varget, BR-2, .010 jump, 3x fired Winchester brass weighing 157.2-157.4 grains, bullets sorted by weight.

Conditions:
Tri-County Gun Club is known for swirling conditions. When the wind blows, things get very difficult in a hurry. In addition to difficult to read wind direction, topographic features result in significant vertical deflection of bullets. This range is the reason I started using heavy bullets for f-class shooting.

The wind was blowing 5-10 mph during the match and the direction was swinging wildly from 6 O’clock to 1 O’clock - the long way around. Both wind flags and daisy wheels were present on the range and they spun around and around relentlessly during second half of the string.

Targets were SR-3 type. The rings were redrawn to MR-1FC standards for scores reported herein.

Results:

Range conditions presented a significant amount of noise in the data. After the second sighter, the first 10 shots for record were fired for “group”. The group was considered primary for this target, and thus vertical impact point was held throughout the string even though it was not centered.

The load printed a group that had a vertical component of 2” with doubled and tripled holes. The score was a paltry 194-3x with the group center approximately 0.5” below the bottom of the X ring. All lost points were to wind. Superimposing the group over the center of the bull gave a theoretical X-count increase to 7X. Despite the low score, mine was the highest of the night.

During my string, I noticed several times that I gained points due to the lesser wind deflection of the heavy bullet. My competitors (shooting 155's and 175's) were hitting 9’s while I was hitting 10’s and 8’s when I’d get a 9.

Overall impressions of the 185 and 200 grain Hybrid bullets:

The 185 is a good bullet. Unfortunately, I don’t have enough barrel length (26") to safely get it to the 2720+ velocity node with Varget. I do not have a suitable powder available right now (RL17) to get it up there safely. Although it is outside the node, accuracy of sub half MOA was easy to obtain. Unfortunately, half-minute accuracy is no longer good enough in F-class shooting. With Varget, I would have to back it down to 2610 fps, and that would be a waste. The performance gains would be minimal compared to other bullets available (specifically the 200). Even though I wasn’t able to get into the node with this barrel and powder, I think that this would be an optimal bullet for a 30” or longer barrel.

The 200gr Hybrid exceeded all of my expectations. The vertical precision is far better than any other “heavy” bullet I have used or tested. The wind deflection appears to be equal to or better than the 210 vld. While the 155 Fullbore gives amazing precision, the 200 gr Hybrid almost matches it and has a significant advantage in retained velocity and wind deflection. With my current load, 1000 yard competition is possible with a 26” barrel.

I’d like to thank Berger Bullets for including me in this testing. It is an honor to get to help out.

Keith Glasscock

P.S. I’ve shot nearly all of the 200gr hybrids I received and would like more of them. It is now my go-to bullet for this rifle in difficult conditions.

Thank you very much for this information! I just tested the 200 and 215 in my new Shilen rifle. Plenty of velocity left at a 1000 yards. I chose nodes at lower velocities just to give myself safety margin when the temperature is 105F.
 
finally got my new ftr gun out and got the following results in south Louisiana
86 F, 68% Hum, 29.95 BP, 1995 density altitude
31" Bartlein 5R, 1:10.25 ROT, GA Precision Templar V2, RBLPLE, GRS Hybrid stock, .340 nk, .199 fb

all shot over magnetto v3

to get on paper and start with something convenient i used 168 FGMM factory ammo to sight in at 25 yards and got 2850 FPS avg for 3 shots with 11 SD and 20 ES
next i used ABM 185 jug match ammo, that i measured 2.295 BTO and 2.958 COAL and i got a 2714 avg on 6 shots, 16.3 sd with 50 es, b/c one shot was 2689, rest were 2711 to 2739
i also shot some Copper Creek 208 A max loads that were 2.195 BTO and 2.925 COAL and got 2643 avg velocity for 3 shots

now, my load work up at 100 yards ( i started reloading in April)
I measured my BTO as 2.355 were touching lands
This is virgin Lapua 308 win brass with the necks turned down to .013 by me, only ran thru the 21st Cent expander die, measured 2.009 to 2.010 long before firing, all with Fed 210 GMM primers
200 gr Berger Hybrids pointed

Varget powder weighed a bald eagle scale, brass and bullets were not weight sorted

2.350 BTO, 3.095 COAL
40.25 gr - 3 shots only one registered on chrono at 2510 and accuracy was bad
40.82 gr - 3 shots 2516 FPS avg, 9.3 sd, 17 ES and full 1 inch group
41.81 gr - 3 shots 2569 FPS avg, 5.0 sd, 10 es and 3/4"
42.72 gr - 3 shots 2650 FPS avg, 66.5 sd, 123 ES ( must have had wrong charge) 2" group
43.50 gr - 3 shots 2652 FPS avg, 15.5 sd, 29 es 3/4" group
44.01 gr - 3 shots 2682 FPS avg, 2.0 sd, 4.0 ES!!! 1/2" group----need to try to replicate this load
2.330 BTO, 3.075 COAL
42.50 gr - 3 shots 2602 FPS avg, 7.0 sd, 14 es
43.00 gr - 3 shots 2637 FPS avg, 16.7 sd, 30 es
43.50 gr - 3 shots 2654 FPS avg, 20.2 sd, 40 es
44.00 gr - 3 shots 2678 FPS avg, 16 sd, 32 es---1/2' group
No pressure signs on any of these loads
fire cases measured .338 at the neck, so reamer is .340 and measured 2.005 long

now having put this all together, i need to follow erik corntinas load work up more closely and not be quite so random, although the 44 gr/2680 fps mark appears to be where she likes to shoot
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,586
Messages
2,221,511
Members
79,726
Latest member
radiowaves88
Back
Top