• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Berger 108 target bt seating depth?

Been experimenting with Berger 108s in my straight 6br no neck turn savage criterion. I've settled on a charge of varget over cci 450s that's giving me great vertical and low velocity spreads and giving me about 2880 fps out of a 28" barrel which I'm happy with.
My question is what seating depth for these do you find works? I've read seating depth mattered less with the 108s and to a certain extent that seems to be true the group sizes are all close to .25 moa but they seem to be getting small with a bigger jump. My last 5 shot group was jumped .024 and had a .19" group at 100. I didn't think I'd be jumping that far so didnt have any loaded deeper. .02 was also a group right at .25" with no fliers. Should I stick with that or keep going deeper?

Stick with what YOUR RIFLE LIKES ! The BERGER 6mm 108 BT Target bullet has a TANGENT ogive and over length nose dimension. The nose dimension gives it the BC numbers. The TANGENT ogive makes it tolerant of jump. You have to test and find what YOUR RIFLE likes to be at its most accurate. And gives you the velocity you need for the round to still be supersonic at the range(s) you will be shooting out too. Also look at the Standard Deviation (SD) reading (10 or less) and "water line" of the bullet strikes on the target . This will indicate whether or not your load / bullet seating depth has very little or no Vertical Dispersion which is what you want.
 
Ok, since this thread is still active, I'll add my experience too.

I'm shooting a Savage 12 F Class in 6br and initially the throat was too short to seat the 105 Hybrids out far enough to keep the bearing surface out of the shoulder area. So, I had a local "gunsmith" extend the throat.

Things went array along the way and then it was impossible to get enough bearing surface and keep the .030 jump that the rifle liked. So, I decided to try the 108 instead, knowing that I would need a big jump.

It turns out that .120 jump gives me about .180 seated bearing surface and It groups very well! I'm very happy with the combination and my shooting/scores keep getting better.

Richard
 
My 2 cents if I may add , is that each seating depth I've sampled has a definitive pattern on the paper target, so far I've really enjoyed working with them.
SPJ
 
I think you are wise testing first at 100 then farther out with the 100 yd established load.

Yes and no.

Fine to DEVELOP a load at 100 yards. Best to FINE TUNE WAYYYYY out there. It is just easier to see the difference at longer range.

I know that there have been a few threads here about "load development at 100 yards". But....I ALWAYS had my own private 1200 yard range, and was always fairly successful in 1K br. THIS YEAR I was restricted to 750 and never did ANY tuning at 1K. I didn't have the greatest of years!! Was it the lack of testing at 1K...OR...I'm getting old? :(:oops::mad:

Who knows.

As far as the OP...I have ALWAYS had better "luck" ;) with a 10 to 20 thou JAM with EVERY bullet in EVERY BBL. I shoot the 108's, 105 H, and 105 VLD....all INTO the lands.

Good luck,
Tod
 
^^^really that's your advice,
Jam your rounds and shoot um at a grand?
 
Of all the bullets I've tried, this one is the most tolerant of seating depth, just need to be mindful when jamming because the longer bearing surface of this bullet will impact the pressure if you're not careful. I did get caught out with this but quickly worked out what was going on. 10 into the lands and 10 out - I've shot clean with this bullet out to 800 metres. Whether it's even happier with a larger jump I have no idea, it was just very easy to get shooting well.
 
^^^really that's your advice,
Jam your rounds and shoot um at a grand?

Man, your reading and comprehension skills suck.

What does "load development at close range" mean?

What does "fine tune" mean?

What would "fine tune at longer range" mean?

I do seating depth tests on everything. How else would I know that the jam shoots best?

NEVER did I say Jam em and shoot em.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DT
People say run a seating depth test from 20 in to 20 out in 2 thousands intervals. That's a lot of ammo and barrel life. You think 3 shots gives you enough info or really need 5-10 to prove your group ?
 
Man, your reading and comprehension skills suck.

What does "load development at close range" mean?

What does "fine tune" mean?

What would "fine tune at longer range" mean?

I do seating depth tests on everything. How else would I know that the jam shoots best?

NEVER did I say Jam em and shoot em.
I probably shouldn't have criticized I just struggled to read your post,
Have you proof read it yourself?
You jump around a bit, there is a few grammar issues several smileys etc.
you seem to talk more of your private range and your own accomplishments and what YOU always do than really advise on load development techniques.
When I see those types of post I admit to cherry picking.
SPJ
 
I probably shouldn't have criticized I just struggled to read your post,
Have you proof read it yourself?
You jump around a bit, there is a few grammar issues several smileys etc.
you seem to talk more of your private range and your own accomplishments and what YOU always do than really advise on load development techniques.
When I see those types of post I admit to cherry picking.
SPJ

"you seem to talk more of your private range and your own accomplishments and what YOU always do than really advise on load development techniques."

He asked "what seating depth works best for you"?. I answered. He didn't ask about load development techniques. Pretty simple reading.


Would you prefer to hear from people who don't have any accomplishments? How about hearing from people who don't have any first hand knowledge..who only quote what the read on the I N T E R N E T? How about from people who just want to argue?

There are a few people around here just like that. They don't last long, and are called out on it. People want to hear from experienced shooters who have been there and done that. I got the t-shirt!! If you think that this is bragging, then so be it.

My thoughts are that people ask questions from people more knowledgeable...and..there is ALWAYS someone with more knowledge and experience on this form!!

If not, then why are we all here?

Tod
 
Last edited:
"you seem to talk more of your private range and your own accomplishments and what YOU always do than really advise on load development techniques."

He asked "what seating depth works best for you"?. I answered. He didn't ask about load development techniques. Pretty simple reading.


Would you prefer to hear from people who don't have any accomplishments? How about hearing from people who don't have any first hand knowledge..who only quote what the read on the I N T E R N E T? How about from people who just want to argue?

There are a few people around here just like that. They don't last long, and are called out on it. People want to hear from experienced shooters who have been there and done that. I got the t-shirt!! If you think that this is bragging then so be it.

My thoughts are that people ask questions from people more knowledgeable...and..there is ALWAYS someone with more knowledge and experience on this form!!

If not, then why are we all here?

Tod
"you seem to talk more of your private range and your own accomplishments and what YOU always do than really advise on load development techniques."

He asked "what seating depth works best for you"?. I answered. He didn't ask about load development techniques. Pretty simple reading.


Would you prefer to hear from people who don't have any accomplishments? How about hearing from people who don't have any first hand knowledge..who only quote what the read on the I N T E R N E T? How about from people who just want to argue?

There are a few people around here just like that. They don't last long, and are called out on it. People want to hear from experienced shooters who have been there and done that. I got the t-shirt!! If you think that this is bragging then so be it.

My thoughts are that people ask questions from people more knowledgeable...and..there is ALWAYS someone with more knowledge and experience on this form!!

If not, then why are we all here?

Tod
well said,
Always room for improvement on my end!
Jim
 
People say run a seating depth test from 20 in to 20 out in 2 thousands intervals. That's a lot of ammo and barrel life. You think 3 shots gives you enough info or really need 5-10 to prove your group ?

No matter what the test, or what you are testing for.....if you shoot 3 shot groups, and some of the groups are bad, adding shots to those groups won't make them better. True one good 3 shot group needs to be looked at more with more groups, but, at least you know which loads to NOT try again.

Actually, with my big 300's and 338's I shoot 2 shot groups to start to save on ...well, everything, including my shoulder.

Just my .02,
Tod
 
Last edited:
No matter what the test, or what you are testing for.....if you shoot 3 shot groups, and some of the groups are bad, adding shots to those groups won't make them better. True one good 3 shot group needs to be looked at more with more groups, but, at least you know which loads to NOT try again.

Actually, with my big 300's and 338's I shoot 2 shot groups to start to save on ...well, everything, including my shoulder.

Just my .02,
Tod
Yeah I've settled on 3 shot groups for my 284 and 3 or 4 shots for a 6br. For whatever reason my flier tends to be in the first 3 shots. My 5th round never seems to destroy my groups.
 
People say run a seating depth test from 20 in to 20 out in 2 thousands intervals. That's a lot of ammo and barrel life. You think 3 shots gives you enough info or really need 5-10 to prove your group ?
Imo you start with larger movements over a wide range...say .005. This should highlight a window that shows whether it likes jam jump or a lot of jump. In smaller increments say .003 tune in around that window.
This bullet doesnt look fussy. So it might not give a strong preference of any one depth. I always go past the best so I know. Typically it's a pattern that starts larger tightens up and then increases again.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,844
Messages
2,204,053
Members
79,148
Latest member
tsteinmetz
Back
Top