Just a question, but if he is planning on shooting much at all, he really should invest in a reloading set up.
The up front cost might seem high, but The cost of quality Factory ammunition is getting higher by the day.
And it’s not just a cost thing. Even a simple reloading kit like the ones offered by companies like RCBS will allow him to enhance his shooting activity to a great degree.
If there is a reason that doing his own reloading would be prohibitive, then just ignore my thoughts..
The 223 is a better choice for just general shooting. Everything is a compromise. such as cost per shot, barrel life, how many rounds you can shoot before heat is an issue. availability of ammo, different types of ammo, different bullet weights.
What I really like about 223 is if you really want to lean wind shoot a 50gr bullet. Want something to buck it better go heavy.
Hand loading (eventually) 223 is very easy to load for and there is a ton of information on good loads. There are many bullets to choose from that shoot well way out there.
What ever they chose I would think something with a bit more weight to take recoil would be a good idea. Also getting a faster twist to work with the heaver bullets. Get a threaded barrel so they can add a silencer if they want. My wife does not like shooting with out a silencer once she tried one.
An AR SHOULD be an AR, that's nonsense .Anyone’s first centerfire rifle should be a .223 . And your first 223 should be an AR15. After that, consider a bolt .223. An AR15 can do almost anything a bolt .223 can, and many things it cannot dream of doing.
I am with Josh,the Tikka T3x Varmint in 223 is a heck of a good value and they are great shooting guns.Here’s a good choice: A lightly used T3x Varmint in 223. I found this one for a little under $700.
View attachment 1203374
For the ladies , 6.5 Grendel. Light recoil, light rifle. Deadly . Same recoil as 223, alot more thump at 300 yds . Alot deader. Deader isnt really a word ,,, but you get my drift .
Seem to me back in the day if you wanted to get a youngster or lady a comfortable rifle to shoot it was a 2 forty something the other made by Winchester.
The name of the cartridge escapes me since all we hear about is the 6br/bra and creedmoor.
Oh yeah the good ol 243 Winchester that's the one I'm thinking of.
Yeh, but the 6BR ROCKS!Seem to me back in the day if you wanted to get a youngster or lady a comfortable rifle to shoot it was a 2 forty something the other made by Winchester.
The name of the cartridge escapes me since all we hear about is the 6br/bra and creedmoor.
Oh yeah the good ol 243 Winchester that's the one I'm thinking of.
Well if you take a 6BR, add 10 grains of powder and the extra recoil to it, you will end up with a 243 Win. From a technical point of view, the 6BR obsoleted it with same/better ballistics using much less powder.Seem to me back in the day if you wanted to get a youngster or lady a comfortable rifle to shoot it was a 2 forty something the other made by Winchester.
The name of the cartridge escapes me since all we hear about is the 6br/bra and creedmoor.
Oh yeah the good ol 243 Winchester that's the one I'm thinking of.
Well if you take a 6BR, add 10 grains of powder and the extra recoil to it, you will end up with a 243 Win. From a technical point of view, the 6BR obsoleted it with same/better ballistics using much less powder.
About the only reason to consider 243 Win is off-the-shelf ammo everywhere and easier mag feeding.