Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
4 groove all the way. I like .237, but others like .236. I think the big advantage of four groove is that you can line up the grooves with the chuck jaws in the lathe. This makes the final dialing in via direct read off the grooves easier.
You thinking higher round count before the barrel gives out? Or between cleanings?I feel like, without having any back up of hard numbers, that I get more accurate rounds through a 5R barrel. For the makers that offer it, they don’t really claim any benefits to be had though, maybe a vague ease of cleaning reference here or there.
Brux barrels are dimensionally tighter than Bartlein 5R’s. Brux typically makes .236 bore 6mm’s and Bartlein’s standard is .237. I’ve been told of several Brux barrels that were even tighter than .236. Your Brux barrels may be operating at a higher pressure than your Bartlein 5R’s. Not sure whether 4 or 5 groove has anything to do with pressure.I’m thinking higher round count before take off. I’m not sure why that would bear out though, which perplexes me.
The theory I might venture, after a 90 round 1,000 yard F-class match this morning, is that Bartlein 5R’s are relatively lower friction / pressure.
I shot 3 rifles today, two Bartlein 5R’s and 1 Brux 4 groove, all 35 plus inches.
The guns can share ammo. The Brux was new and speeding up and it was shot mainly to warm up and put a zero on. When I reracked it, the bullets were at 2,030 FPS at 1,000 and rising. That barrel is crossing identical loads moving towards 100 FPS faster than both 5R’s, which themselves were otherwise the highest V at 1,000. In a sense it’s getting more “result” from the same cartridge, but something is being stressed more inside to arrive there.
I realize that groove shape or number may not account for kind of pressure difference. Nevertheless, those are all 7mm standard diameter barrels, so... it might.
When I envision a tight fitting jacketed bullet being forced down a hypothetical smooth bore, I’d expect bad galling and a huge pressure spike, (press two panes of glass together while trying to rub them on top of each other) with the lands breaking up the widths of flat metal on metal. In that sense, more lands may have the effect of narrower bands of potentially galling metal on metal.
I believe there may be something to this in that I don’t see any four groove barrels in my larger calibers where quite wide flats would be in contact if only 4 grooves where used. Kreiger uses 6 starting at .338, or 5R, and by the point of 50’s, barrels have 8 grooves.
One of those 5R’s was down only one point per each of two 15 shot, pair fire matches for V2 qualifying purposes, and extremely flat on waterline, which I think was the high on those two matches, so I’m really happy with that accuracy.
Just an added thought. With a 4 groove, you have a land pushing on a land. With a 5 groove, the land pushes on a groove.
@davidjoe, were your bullet blowups that you had, with 4 groove bbls.?
Lloyd