Decided to compare a couple of forced-air barrel cooling methods.
I used a self-adhesive thermocouple sensor adhered to the left side of the chamber, this is a K-Type sensor with sufficient accuracy for the task at hand, the sensor was connected through an interface to a laptop PC, readings were logged each second over a two hour shooting session :

The forced-air cooling methods were a USB-powered chamber fan, and a Ryobi clip-on jobsite fan:


The control was to let the barrel cool naturally, then the chamber fan, then the jobsite fan, then both fans. I selected a high temperature and low temperature common to all methods; in other words, they all start at the same-ish high temp and cool to the same-ish low temp, within 1/2 a degree.
The results shown below indicate the barrel took about 30 minutes to cool naturally, 19 minutes with the chamber fan, 10 minutes with the jobsite fan, and 8.5 minutes with both fans:

More useless fun caused by being retired, lol.
I used a self-adhesive thermocouple sensor adhered to the left side of the chamber, this is a K-Type sensor with sufficient accuracy for the task at hand, the sensor was connected through an interface to a laptop PC, readings were logged each second over a two hour shooting session :

The forced-air cooling methods were a USB-powered chamber fan, and a Ryobi clip-on jobsite fan:


The control was to let the barrel cool naturally, then the chamber fan, then the jobsite fan, then both fans. I selected a high temperature and low temperature common to all methods; in other words, they all start at the same-ish high temp and cool to the same-ish low temp, within 1/2 a degree.
The results shown below indicate the barrel took about 30 minutes to cool naturally, 19 minutes with the chamber fan, 10 minutes with the jobsite fan, and 8.5 minutes with both fans:

More useless fun caused by being retired, lol.









