OK, so my question is I have been reading that shooting a ballistic tip bullet is less desirable than a hollow point target bullet because of the process of putting the tip in the bullet is not always perfect. Would it then be desirable then to shoot a hollow point bullet even if the bc is lower.
I shoot long range only on the pdog field. Otherwise its 300 and under. I am shooting a 204 ruger and last year I shot a pdog at 590 yards and my brother shot one at 785 using hornady vmax 40 gr. The bc on them is .275 g1 and they are a ballistic tip. The Berger’s I was looking at are a 40gr hollow point with a bc of .225 g1. The bullet selection in a 20 cal is really lacking in my opinion. It’s a great caliber and with the 20br, 204 ruger, and the 20 practial I would think some new bullets would be made available. Anyway, would the drop in bc be acceptable because the meplat and ojive would be more constant or is the bc important enough to make up for all but huge constancy issues?
I shoot long range only on the pdog field. Otherwise its 300 and under. I am shooting a 204 ruger and last year I shot a pdog at 590 yards and my brother shot one at 785 using hornady vmax 40 gr. The bc on them is .275 g1 and they are a ballistic tip. The Berger’s I was looking at are a 40gr hollow point with a bc of .225 g1. The bullet selection in a 20 cal is really lacking in my opinion. It’s a great caliber and with the 20br, 204 ruger, and the 20 practial I would think some new bullets would be made available. Anyway, would the drop in bc be acceptable because the meplat and ojive would be more constant or is the bc important enough to make up for all but huge constancy issues?