ALL HANDS: This is your call to action! Pick up the phone and call Duncan
Hunter and Darrel Issa, you have everything you need to know contained in the
message below to voice your concerns. SMGC’s President has already made the
calls and is awaiting their response, please help light a fire under their
response by voicing your concerns to their offices immediately.
County Supervisor Bill Horn will be called on Monday, please try to beat me to
it.
Thank you for your more than 60 years of service to the shooting community SMGC!
and many more to come with your continued support, we need you now, more than
ever!
John Hermsen, President/CRSO and the Board of Directors
SMGC
>
> Mr. Hermsen:
>
> Good afternoon.... The following is in response to a request from the Santa
Margarita Gun Club (SMGC) received by the MCIW-MCB Camp Pendleton G-3/5
(Operations, Training, and Plans) office for a modification to the existing Real
Estate License Agreement (N6871192RP02Q35):
>
> 1) The MCIW-MCB Camp Pendleton G-3/5 is opposed to the SMGC expanding the
number of ranges currently authorized for use and delineated in the existing
agreement.
>
> 2) The current agreement will be in place for another 18 months, during which
time the SMGC may continue to operate at Wilcox Rifle/Pistol and R-116A/117A as
stipulated in the existing agreement at no additional costs.
>
> 3) Upon expiration of the current agreement, if the SMGC should choose to
pursue continued range use aboard the base, expect the following as a result of
recent changes to SECNAV policy regarding Non-Federal Entities and use of DoN
land:
>
> A) NAVFAC administrative processing fee's associated with new license
agreements (approx. $3,000.00)
> B) The execution of an Environmental Conditions Report checklist with all
costs associated with this effort to be borne by the SMGC (no clear-cut
estimate, but most likely in the thousands of dollars...)
> C) Fair Market Value for use of the range (s)...
> - This would also require a Fair Market Value Appraisal, for which the SMGC
would be responsible for all costs associated with this effort; to include
subsequent costs associated with use of the range, based on fair market
value...Again, no estimate readily available for the aforementioned costs,
but it's fair to assume costs would be well into the thousands of dollars.
>
> In short, there is a "pay for play" mandate in effect. Even if the G-3/5 were
to support expanded range use for the SMGC as requested, a new agreement would
need to be established, bringing all factors identified above into play. We
understand there has been a long-standing relationship between this installation
and the SMGC; however, this installation is bound by Secretary of the Navy
policy and guidance.
>
> If you have any additional questions relative to this issue, please feel free
to contact me via email, or the phone number provided below. If you would
prefer a formal letter of response, please advise and we will provide.
>
> V/r
>
Hunter and Darrel Issa, you have everything you need to know contained in the
message below to voice your concerns. SMGC’s President has already made the
calls and is awaiting their response, please help light a fire under their
response by voicing your concerns to their offices immediately.
County Supervisor Bill Horn will be called on Monday, please try to beat me to
it.
Thank you for your more than 60 years of service to the shooting community SMGC!
and many more to come with your continued support, we need you now, more than
ever!
John Hermsen, President/CRSO and the Board of Directors
SMGC
>
> Mr. Hermsen:
>
> Good afternoon.... The following is in response to a request from the Santa
Margarita Gun Club (SMGC) received by the MCIW-MCB Camp Pendleton G-3/5
(Operations, Training, and Plans) office for a modification to the existing Real
Estate License Agreement (N6871192RP02Q35):
>
> 1) The MCIW-MCB Camp Pendleton G-3/5 is opposed to the SMGC expanding the
number of ranges currently authorized for use and delineated in the existing
agreement.
>
> 2) The current agreement will be in place for another 18 months, during which
time the SMGC may continue to operate at Wilcox Rifle/Pistol and R-116A/117A as
stipulated in the existing agreement at no additional costs.
>
> 3) Upon expiration of the current agreement, if the SMGC should choose to
pursue continued range use aboard the base, expect the following as a result of
recent changes to SECNAV policy regarding Non-Federal Entities and use of DoN
land:
>
> A) NAVFAC administrative processing fee's associated with new license
agreements (approx. $3,000.00)
> B) The execution of an Environmental Conditions Report checklist with all
costs associated with this effort to be borne by the SMGC (no clear-cut
estimate, but most likely in the thousands of dollars...)
> C) Fair Market Value for use of the range (s)...
> - This would also require a Fair Market Value Appraisal, for which the SMGC
would be responsible for all costs associated with this effort; to include
subsequent costs associated with use of the range, based on fair market
value...Again, no estimate readily available for the aforementioned costs,
but it's fair to assume costs would be well into the thousands of dollars.
>
> In short, there is a "pay for play" mandate in effect. Even if the G-3/5 were
to support expanded range use for the SMGC as requested, a new agreement would
need to be established, bringing all factors identified above into play. We
understand there has been a long-standing relationship between this installation
and the SMGC; however, this installation is bound by Secretary of the Navy
policy and guidance.
>
> If you have any additional questions relative to this issue, please feel free
to contact me via email, or the phone number provided below. If you would
prefer a formal letter of response, please advise and we will provide.
>
> V/r
>