• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Are Short Action Custom (SAC) bushings the bomb?

After watching my favorite YouTube guy "Johnny's Reloading Bench's" episode about the "best" bushings
He found that SAC bushings actually do produce loads with less runout. Can anybody confirm this? Did I just waste HUNDREDS of dollars on Redding bushings, just to find this out? Lol
Looking at SAC's website, the cost is comparable. I think I'll be buying them from now on.....
 
I found it strange, and really can't figure out why, the SAC bushing he used was .001" larger than the Redding bushing, but they both sized the neck down to the same o.d. on the neck. He checked the i.d. of both bushings using pin gauges, and they were marked correctly. Hmmm
 
I'd say that you did not waste your money. Redding bushings have certainly been used by a LOT of shooters over the years, with excellent results. You got what you paid for and they should work just fine.

I'd be surprised if the bushing itself is the primary cause of excessive runout in the majority of cases. For that reason, it's difficult for me to comprehend how a different brand of bushings would have a noticeable effect on runout in a properly set up sizing die. Having said that, I'd be interested to find out whether Mark Gordon's bushings are "truer" to the stated size than other brands. In my hands, a specific sized Redding bushing may get you close, but the actual OD of sized necks may not always be the OD expected from a given bushing.
 
If all bushings exhibit zero runout on the ID and OD, how would one induce more runout?
SAC claims that all OTHER bushings are inferior because they are basically cylinder shaped inside, where theirs is tapered at the end, and that “supposedly”induces less runout. (If I understand that correctly)
 
SAC claims that all OTHER bushings are inferior because they are basically cylinder shaped inside, where theirs is tapered at the end, and that “supposedly”induces less runout. (If I understand that correctly)
I like my bushings to be straight. I let my straight bushings, concentric necks and good dies determine my runout
 
SAC claims that all OTHER bushings are inferior because they are basically cylinder shaped inside, where theirs is tapered at the end, and that “supposedly”induces less runout. (If I understand that correctly)
Another lame attempt to make something out of nothing. If it is round and too size I really don't care what brand it is.
 
The hole might be egg shaped, or the surfaces on the top and/or bottom are not square with the hole. The hole may measure .260 even though it’s marked .262 or vice versa. There are many ways to mess up something as simple as a bushing.
 
I just bought a SAC bushing. First thing I did was measure the length for deck height variation. One side is .001 longer than the other.

Haven’t tried it yet, but I know from the get go there is at least one dimension that is out of kilter. Might not make any difference, but then again…
 
Last edited:

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,944
Messages
2,186,986
Members
78,605
Latest member
Jonathan99
Back
Top