• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

AR15, which buffer and spring

I am in the process of getting together parts for another build. I already have the Kreiger barrel after waiting a while for that, its an 18 inch heavy profile barrel with a medium muzzle (I don't know the gas hole diameter, and if I did it still wouldn't help me, but I suppose it could be useful information for someone to figure this out). This rifle will be fired almost exclusively with a suppressor (whats the point in zeroing it if you never know what you are going to show up with). I would like to keep the recoil down to spot on my own, and keep the rifle gas under control instead of having it overgassed for the sake of reliability (and breaking a bolt).

I will be shooting only .223 out of this rifle, and only bullets in the higher grain range (1:7.7 twist). It will have a lighter trigger in it (looking at the Jard triggers) to better match my bolt actions so the hammer spring might be lighter too.

I was thinking to just go with the standard rifle buffer, and get a stiffer spring for it. With the .223 (slightly less oomph than the 5.56, but a heavier projectile, this is what is causing me problems). All of the heavier recoil buffers are several times more expensive than the standard rifle buffer, so I was thinking about buying some tungsten and screwing around with te weights inside of one myself, but I don't know how to tell if the bolt is bouncing with out a high speed camera.

THanks.
 
I also have a Krieger varmatch 223 barrel with a 7.7 twist, and tried an Olympic Arms hydraulic buffer. It caused the gun to short stroke on every round, unless the loads were very hot, showing flattened primers, and this was at the lowest setting.

Instead of the buffer, you might consider looking at the BCG- the M-16 BCG, as sold by a few, is substantially heavier and has more metal. In combination with the Carrier Weight System (Sinclair), you can add substantial mass to the BCG, and increase time in battery. This seems to make the gun able to withstand more pressure without the pressure signs. I run an M-16 BCG in a standard upper with a Geissele trigger, and use the tungsten heavier weight as well. The bolt action is visibly slower and the brass only go a few feet away. As stated on another thread, the gun seems to tolerate at least a grain higher than max published loads without any pressure signs like popped, leaking, punctured, or flattened primers. This has been the case with three different Krieger barrels and two different AR's.
 
Well good. It sounds like the chatter from some of the .223 shooters at my range is a little exaggerated. Between this and the other thread it seems that a M-16 carrier is all the screwing around that is needed. If you want to sped money then spend it on the Tubb CWS, which is still less than the cost of a heavy buffer.

Thanks.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,874
Messages
2,185,526
Members
78,541
Latest member
LBanister
Back
Top