3Sigma
Silver $$ Contributor
Wow. That document is crap. They are trying to use intent in a technical definition. No clear direction in that.
My guess is this was done without the input or blessing of the technical division as it is clearly trying to redefine a SBR and pistol based on an accessory. No clear line of LOP limits, OAL, etc.
Much like 80%, their own language is going to be used against them. I don't see this going anywhere as long as it is challenged in the right federal district.
My guess is this was done without the input or blessing of the technical division as it is clearly trying to redefine a SBR and pistol based on an accessory. No clear line of LOP limits, OAL, etc.
Much like 80%, their own language is going to be used against them. I don't see this going anywhere as long as it is challenged in the right federal district.