175 SMK tipped 43.6/IMR4064 @2.234 to ogive. 26" Criterion 1:10 on Rem SPS action. 5 rounds @100.View attachment 1116627
Are you in or out on your CBTO? I found the 168 SMK's shoot best .005 into the lands.
175 SMK tipped 43.6/IMR4064 @2.234 to ogive. 26" Criterion 1:10 on Rem SPS action. 5 rounds @100.View attachment 1116627
Tried them about a year ago , and found out two things about them .
#1 they seemed to shoot best in my rifle at .005 off touch .
#2 My rifle would not shoot them even decently for competition , so after two hundred rounds wasted money , I went back to Berger's .
BTW ; I got the same kind of result @BW did at 100 yrds. , but they would not hold group at 600 out of a Kelby / Brux 30" - 1 / 10 twist .
Are you in or out on your CBTO? I found the 168 SMK's shoot best .005 into the lands.
If you guys are finding them hard to tune, i recommend following Bergers VLD seating depth test.
That was kinda my point . I was never happy enough with any group at any charge to start playing with seating depth . 100+ in with two different powders IMR 4064 and AR-comp and best groups were moa at best . If I can't get sub moa right away with little effort . I get over it real fast . No way I was going to then spend another 100 rounds and 3 range trips just to "maybe" dial it in . I already have good loads with other components , I don't need the bullet that bad lol![]()
Here is my test with the 175 TMK out of a 1:11.25, 24", Krieger attached to a Rem 700. https://i.imgur.com/MNbhaHh.jpg
I stopped shooting those at the 2.840" COAL because the groups were bad and the butt stock loosened up. Ill try a seating depth test somewhere between 3,4,5,6. I am going to be using this for PRS style matches so mag length is what I am limited to. I will probably split the difference between 4 and 5 and do seating depth on that charge weight. I am not a great shot so this is probably a fools errand but might as well try.
Load between 3 and 4Here is my test with the 175 TMK out of a 1:11.25, 24", Krieger attached to a Rem 700. https://i.imgur.com/MNbhaHh.jpg
I stopped shooting those at the 2.840" COAL because the groups were bad and the butt stock loosened up. Ill try a seating depth test somewhere between 3,4,5,6. I am going to be using this for PRS style matches so mag length is what I am limited to. I will probably split the difference between 4 and 5 and do seating depth on that charge weight. I am not a great shot so this is probably a fools errand but might as well try.
The SD's were:Never say fools errand. I'm not a great shot either but if you saw my target post you would think differently. #9 looks promising. What is the sd on that?
BW
What is the load specs for 3 and 4?
@_Raining
Try these seating depths or are 3 and 4 somewhere close to these?
1. .010 off the lands (jump)
2. .050 off the lands (jump)
3. .090 off the lands (jump)
4. .130 off the lands (jump)
I'd load 42gr and do seating test.The SD's were:
1 - SD 5.6,
2 - SD 7,
3 - SD 6,
4 - SD 6.6,
5 - SD 6.4,
6 - N/A,
7 - SD 8.7,
8 - SD 9.4,
9 - SD 4.3,
10 - SD 3.2
9 and 10 have good SD but from what I understand about 100 yard load dev is that you look for consistent POI and 9 and 10 are very different. And 9's flier is where 10's POI is and 10's flier is where 9's POI is so either that is a coincidence or those 2 charges are on the edge of a fairly large POI shift.
3 is 41.9 grains of n150 and 4 is 42.2 grains of n150.
3 is at 2547, 4 is at 2558 (charge 10 is 44gr of n150 at 2639 fps).
The MV is a little weak but the comp goes out to 700 yards so I don't need to be pushing them very hard. Plus there is no tactical class in this competition so I am going to always be at a disadvantage compared to the 6 and 6.5's. I am just trying to get a good load to compete with and practice reading the wind with. No signs of pressure on the brass so I suppose I could always look further for a higher node.
I am limited to magazine length and the notch on the R700 isn't deep enough to run long cartridges out of the ARC or any other mag that can be ordered with the spacer plate thing removed. So I am limited to less than 2.880", plus a little for tip variation I figure 2.875" is where I can start which is about 40 thou jump.
I locktited the butt stock screw so it shouldn't loosen up next time I go out. I suppose it is possible that the loose butt stock is the reason for the worse groups at 2.840" (I shot 2.860" first).
The SD's were:
1 - SD 5.6,
2 - SD 7,
3 - SD 6,
4 - SD 6.6,
5 - SD 6.4,
6 - N/A,
7 - SD 8.7,
8 - SD 9.4,
9 - SD 4.3,
10 - SD 3.2
9 and 10 have good SD but from what I understand about 100 yard load dev is that you look for consistent POI and 9 and 10 are very different. And 9's flier is where 10's POI is and 10's flier is where 9's POI is so either that is a coincidence or those 2 charges are on the edge of a fairly large POI shift.
3 is 41.9 grains of n150 and 4 is 42.2 grains of n150.
3 is at 2547, 4 is at 2558 (charge 10 is 44gr of n150 at 2639 fps).
The MV is a little weak but the comp goes out to 700 yards so I don't need to be pushing them very hard. Plus there is no tactical class in this competition so I am going to always be at a disadvantage compared to the 6 and 6.5's. I am just trying to get a good load to compete with and practice reading the wind with. No signs of pressure on the brass so I suppose I could always look further for a higher node.
I am limited to magazine length and the notch on the R700 isn't deep enough to run long cartridges out of the ARC or any other mag that can be ordered with the spacer plate thing removed. So I am limited to less than 2.880", plus a little for tip variation I figure 2.875" is where I can start which is about 40 thou jump.
I locktited the butt stock screw so it shouldn't loosen up next time I go out. I suppose it is possible that the loose butt stock is the reason for the worse groups at 2.840" (I shot 2.860" first).
It def could have but the other 4 shots are at very different POI in 9 vs 10.That loose screw could also cause the flyer in 9&10.
BW