dgeesaman
Gold $$ Contributor
A few weeks ago there was a thread about how the ranks of shooters was dwindling at competitions and I said cost was a factor, some agreed, some did not. It got me to thinking and I just added up what my 30BR cost me (was just finished), here goes; Used action with stock $1500, barrel with threading and chamber $600, used scope $600, rings $85= $2785 to date.
I also am in the process of building another 6BR, so far $1500 for action $500 total for used stock(includes inlet and bedding) $700 for barrel when finished scope and rings $1400= $4100 total.
Now you tell me that cost is not a factor, I can't see a younger family man being able to afford this game we play. This is why I didn't start until I was 61 retired and family grown and out of college. Just plain couldn't afford it. Last match I shot at average age was probably 69-70.
So I will stick with my original thought- Cost to play.
My $0.02 (or 1/5 of a primer, which was one primer ten years ago)
Several years ago I started shooting powderburners. Rimfire at first, centerfire not long after. A few regular members at my club were short range benchrest guys. What they were able to do was amazing to me.
But they did me a favor - they didn't sugarcoat the cost situation. $25k to get going when you consider reloading gear, the rifle and optic, flags, rest, reamer, several barrels and a few thousand bullets, travel costs. etc. I can't recall if that included hand pulling the bullets, probably did. They said that was needed to just to have a chance at winning. I never pursued SRBR, and even though I've easily spent that much on shooting by now, I still don't think I would have been very happy if all of my personal shooting investment went into becoming a mid-pack SRBR shooter. I'm happily well-equipped for a wide range of recreational shooting events.
I also attended a couple of LRBR clinics and the cost was the same or higher and the nearest ranges are a couple hours away. I enjoy LR shooting but not to the point of spending hours on the road to fire a few dozen rounds.
More recently I've started rimfire BR competition. While SRBR and LRBR might lean toward the "Formula 1" division of shooting, as people move out of CF competitions and into rimfire, their spending habits come with them. I'm not saying rimfire was ever cheap to compete seriously - but with the inrush of centerfire shooters, the demand for high end rimfire stuff has gone up, supply has barely changed, and prices have gone up. Likewise, rimfire shooters are leaving unlimited classes and moving toward factory classes. And so on. Airgunning is getting a lot more action these days - it seems to be the lowest cost shooting competition where shooting skill is central and true precision is still possible.
Anyway, competition in shooting is an economic competition as well as skill. When the top competitors invest well into five figures and nobody else is winning, before long they could be competing alone.
And one other thing, which I can't say better than this:
The fact that many shooting competitions are governed by the NRA is a big turn-off for me. Might as well be sponsored by Paypal, as far as I'm concerned.Locally there is one managed range. I'm old enough to understand the reasons for some of the requirements for membership, but still balk at some of it.
1. NRA Membership
2. Must Compete
I quit the NRA when they sent me a gift (knife made in China). Really aggravated me my contribution was spent that way. Also WLP.
Last edited: