Jeff Porter
Gold $$ Contributor
What were your other inputs ? They may have different default atmospheric conditions or altitude. Big factor is scope height too. I have not seen a big difference using the “free “ calculators.
If you're responding to me I'll quote myself. "all and I mean each and everyone was given the exact same input data"What were your other inputs ? They may have different default atmospheric conditions or altitude. Big factor is scope height too. I have not seen a big difference using the “free “ calculators.
Then you should have no issues. Just use one program like Strelok and get used to it.I have quite a good deal of computer experience.
At 1000 yards, I found the outputs of berger, hornady, and JBM to be within 1/2 moa. I tried the basic streloc, and it was 1.5 moa off the others. Don't know if the pro version is any more accurate. This was using a 175 .308 with a .475 bc.I know this is going to get me in hot water but after reading this I checked with several different web sites, JBM, Hornady and Caldwell to name 3 brand names and all and I mean each and everyone when given the exact same input data and in some cases bullet data from their selected drop downs gave me SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT results.
So the questions are, do others get varied results from various applications with identical inputs values? If so why in God's name would I use these?
Wind? On a Rangeman? Something new?I just bought a watch that tells me the exact temperature, barometric pressure, altitude, and wind. Has a compass too.
I'm looking at these programs and my complaint is that when inputting the exact same data I'm getting wildly different results.At 1000 yards, I found the outputs of berger, hornady, and JBM to be within 1/2 moa. I tried the basic streloc, and it was 1.5 moa off the others. Don't know if the pro version is any more accurate. This was using a 175 .308 with a .475 bc.
