• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Accurize my hunting 22lr

On all my groups I measure for your records I measure from the farthest lead smear ring to lead smear ring and then subtract .224. Some bullets on paper will print tad smaller depending on the paper use and the backer. But that is close enough for me. Now instead of ranting go do something productive.
 
Tim that is the outside measurement on all those groups silly boy.

What it means is that instead of a reticle, he measured outside then subtracted.
Read the BHarvey article.
If you think this is what he did for "actual" groups....note his reference to several of his groups averaging .195". How might that be possible since it is smaller than a single bullet hole?
I do apologize, you simply don't have a clue here do you?
 
Thank you for your reply, Drover. I didn't know the cost of all the work necessary and I appreciate your time and information. I have looked at Cooper and Anschutz. I don't remember the Cooper I looked at and can't get to their website at this time, but the Anschutz 1712 silhouette sported has the trigger I want. I know Cooper does guarantee 1/4" group at 50 yards, and I would be pleased to own another one of their rifles. If you had to choose between a Cooper and Anschutz which would you choose?

Anschutz hands down....I have seen to many Coopers not perform to their stated guarantee, shooting 1/4" groups at 50 yards is no easy task
 
Guy is testing torque but using zero wind flags........he's wasting your time and his ammo.
If you have a properly bedded gun, especially a competition rifle, set it at 30 in lbs and your done. Those groups this guy shot between 20 in lbs and 40 in lbs show absolutely nothing that I can see.


I agree here, no flags, I have never had much luck changing torque on action screws, a couple rifles maybe showed slight improvement, thats it
 
I got a good one with my 17HMR not long ago at 100yds right at dark. Wished that one would of went with the rest. But not bad.
 

Attachments

  • 20161114_172141.jpg
    20161114_172141.jpg
    152.4 KB · Views: 35
  • 20161114_214245.jpg
    20161114_214245.jpg
    67 KB · Views: 35
I agree here, no flags, I have never had much luck changing torque on action screws, a couple rifles maybe showed slight improvement, thats it

I suppose where you have a non bedded, non pillared, rifle in a wood stock, I 've seen some varience but again, gotta be able to have a reasonable testing regime.
 
Competition groups are always measured center to center. Using calipers is great for informal measurements and using the outside to outside and subtracting one caliber will always result in a smaller distance than measuring center to center. The bullet does not print a mark that is close to one caliber. Try laying your target between layers of glass with back lighting and measure the distance from center to center with an optical comparator that measures in .001" graduations. That will give you good results for measuring true group sizes.
My .358 Winchester shoots average 5 shot group sizes of .330" at 100 yards using pistol 158 grain bullets over a compressed charge of IMR 4064. If I measure outside to outside it measures .595" and if you subtract .357" it comes out .238" but properly measured it comes out at .330".
If you are going to compare group sizes you should use the same process to measure them.
 
Competition groups are always measured center to center. Using calipers is great for informal measurements and using the outside to outside and subtracting one caliber will always result in a smaller distance than measuring center to center. The bullet does not print a mark that is close to one caliber. Try laying your target between layers of glass with back lighting and measure the distance from center to center with an optical comparator that measures in .001" graduations. That will give you good results for measuring true group sizes.
My .358 Winchester shoots average 5 shot group sizes of .330" at 100 yards using pistol 158 grain bullets over a compressed charge of IMR 4064. If I measure outside to outside it measures .595" and if you subtract .357" it comes out .238" but properly measured it comes out at .330".
If you are going to compare group sizes you should use the same process to measure them.


You're trying, God love ya, but remember our friend here cannot understand that a group with at least two holes side by side, let alone with space btween them, cannot possibly measure less than a single bullet diameter. That alone should suggest whether he's on the right track.
 
Competition groups are always measured center to center. Using calipers is great for informal measurements and using the outside to outside and subtracting one caliber will always result in a smaller distance than measuring center to center. The bullet does not print a mark that is close to one caliber. Try laying your target between layers of glass with back lighting and measure the distance from center to center with an optical comparator that measures in .001" graduations. That will give you good results for measuring true group sizes.
My .358 Winchester shoots average 5 shot group sizes of .330" at 100 yards using pistol 158 grain bullets over a compressed charge of IMR 4064. If I measure outside to outside it measures .595" and if you subtract .357" it comes out .238" but properly measured it comes out at .330".
If you are going to compare group sizes you should use the same process to measure them.

That sounds reasonable. It would be interesting, if you were to post a couple of photos, and measure the groups with the "On Target" software. I've found it to be a quick and easy and fairly accurate.
 
Wanna get an accurate “center to center”? Shoot the same target with the same ammo and average together the OD of several individual ”sizer” shots which are likely to measure smaller than an actual bullet diameter, and then subtract the average “sizer” diameter from the cluster’s extremes outside to outside measurement.
 
That sounds reasonable. It would be interesting, if you were to post a couple of photos, and measure the groups with the "On Target" software. I've found it to be a quick and easy and fairly accurate.

Well, I could scan a couple of targets but someone else would have to run the software unless it will run on a Linux system. (We don't do windows at my house) :)
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,238
Messages
2,214,206
Members
79,464
Latest member
Big Fred
Back
Top