The Texas Supreme Court ruled that Academy Sports cannot be sued for actions by third party over gun purchase with large capacity magazine and subsequently used in mass murder.
Plaintiffs alleged in four lawsuits against Academy Sports and Outdoors that the San Antonio-area store negligently sold the gun to Devin Kelley in 2016, who went on to kill 25 people at the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs before killing himself.
The Air Force failed to enter Kelley's conviction for domestic violence against his wife and infant son into a government database, which should have prevented him from buying the Ruger AR-556 rifle.
The Texas Supreme Court ruled Friday that the retailer was protected from litigation under the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.
A full text of the Court's decision is very revealing and I feel should be recommend reading it to anyone interested in protecting Second Amendment rights. Decisions like this add to precedent when considering court cases aimed at modifying Constitutional rights and protections.
Here is the court's decision and the reasoning behind it. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20973604-190497
Plaintiffs alleged in four lawsuits against Academy Sports and Outdoors that the San Antonio-area store negligently sold the gun to Devin Kelley in 2016, who went on to kill 25 people at the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs before killing himself.
The Air Force failed to enter Kelley's conviction for domestic violence against his wife and infant son into a government database, which should have prevented him from buying the Ruger AR-556 rifle.
The Texas Supreme Court ruled Friday that the retailer was protected from litigation under the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.
- "Although federal law disqualified Kelley from purchasing a firearm at the time of the sale — based in part on his conviction in a 2012 court-martial for assaulting his wife and stepson and his dishonorable discharge from the United States Air Force — that disqualifying information was not in the system, which authorized Academy to 'Proceed' with the sale," the court stated.
A full text of the Court's decision is very revealing and I feel should be recommend reading it to anyone interested in protecting Second Amendment rights. Decisions like this add to precedent when considering court cases aimed at modifying Constitutional rights and protections.
Here is the court's decision and the reasoning behind it. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20973604-190497