• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

A few thoughts on one the latest projects...

Well, just started work on the .223 mid range rifle, got the action, reamer and pilots, and barrel together.

Stiller Predator single shot action - This has to be the best bang for the buck out there. It exactly met dimensional specs, it's square, it's true, it's tight. My guys had just blueprinted a couple of 700s and greatly appreciated checking for quality control issues and finding NONE. They were more impressed when they saw the price on the invoice. VERY reasonable. I don't personally recommend anything that I haven't purchased myself, I personally recommend Stiller, good people to deal with.

PTG - Reamer and pilot set. Custom spec. I checked about a dozen or so reamer designs and didn't find one suitable. So I spec'd one myself. Neck diameter .003" over loaded round, freebore diameter .0004" over bullet diameter, freebore length to suit seating the bullet as long as possible, leade angle to match the bullet.

Someone asked why I didn't just run a throating reamer down the bore. My reply was why do something with potential shortcomings whan I didn't have to. Plus since I have the reamer, I can duplicate the chamber in another barrel. Besides, my smithing team appreciates it when I show up with my own fresh sharp tooling.

PTG makes good stuff, Dave Kiff was very helpful with information and recommendations and a pleasure to deal with.

L-W match program barrel - Not many people use them, and even fewer seem to have much success with them. What I have found is that the barrel to barrel uniformity is exceptional, an important consideration in a 6.5 X 284 for instance. I've only had a dud once, and that was primarily due to a poor chambering job from a smith I no longer use. That barrel was set back, shot very well but would not generate the target velocity missing a couple of inches to cut a clean chamber.

Woody at L-W USA is a bit of a curmudgeon (I'll pay for that one ;D) but he'll go out of his way for little details and hook a brother up.

I will admit that the L-W 50 steel does no cut like 416R or 4140. Speed, feed and lubricant matter a lot. That means a through the headstock lathe with a pressure cutting fluid feed through the bore when cutting the chamber. Which brings up....

Smithing - I do not have permission to mention my guys by name, but one of them is very well known in certain circles. The other is a master machinist by trade and is if anything, better at precision machine work. Their work is essentially perfect. The barrel was indexed to under .0001" on both ends before cutting the chamber, through the headstock, remember? The chambers finish was good enough polishing wasn't deemed needed. The leade to the lands is uniform and doesn't show any burrs at all. The fit to the action is very tight without being too tight.

In the last forty years of having custom work done, I haven't seen anything better and very little to equal. I'm a repeat customer.

I've had smiths flatly refuse to chuck up a Lothar-Walther barrel. IMO this is simply because they are not good enough machinists to change their technique to suit the material and have run into problems. You can't just run a reamer up like it was 416R or 4140 in a dry hole. Won't work. Run the reamer in too hard, too low an rpm, no pressurized cutting fluid feed down the bore and you get a string and the reamer will grab and chatter, catch a chip and score the chamber. Or snap the reamer.

Not to say they won't do a good job in their comfort zone, 4140 is easier, 416R is easier. But then I had one smith tell me that there is no need for a piloted reamer either, a solid pilot would do everything as well... Didn't use his services.

The lessons in all of that are: quality work is worth the asking price, and the asking price is always reasonable; less than quality work isn't worth anything; it doesn't matter how high the quality of the individual components are if they aren't machined and assembled properly.

Well, hopefully the stock will show up in the near future. I'd use a stock from one of my other rifles but the barrel profile doesn't match any of the existing channels and I'm NOT hacking up a McMillan for a temporary install.
 
Rust,
Sounds like a great project, and well planned out! I will say PTG reamers are the best! My Smith called Friday to Question me about my Reamer. He had never used one of Dave Kiff's Reamers. He was impressed! That is saying something because he is not a easy man to impress. Also The customer service at PT&G is just simply superb!! Let us know how it shoots when everthing is up and running!
Mark
 
Sounds like you are happy and that is important.

It's not that the LW50 is that hard to thread and chamber, its their specs that run all over the place. Hopefully they have fixed that problem. When you start seeing them consistantly in the winners circle that will tell you they have fixed their problems. They need to quit hiding behind saying smiths are not capable of machining their so called superior products and make them consistantly good. Is that how I really feel, yes it is!
Butch
 
Butch - Don't worry, I come equipped with a thick skin. ;D And to avoid any possibility of misinterpretation you are NOT one of the people I was referring to in my previous post. And in no way did I mean to make any implications.

I am aware that there has been controversy concerning L-W barrels over the years. One aquaintance with much experience specifically recommends against L-W. On the other hand, my personnal experience has been very, very good. I can only comment on my experience.

To be specific, I only purchase L-W match program barrels and so have no experience with their regular production/OEM line. Even went so far as to spec the 6.5 barrels bore dimensions, and those numbers where hit right on the money. The new .223 barrel gauged and scoped just as good. So did the .308 barrel awaiting a receiver.

As far as smithing goes, I am impressed with my guys. Very impressed. The work equals anything I've ever seen in forty years of shooting. On the other hand, I have occassionally been the recipient of shall we say less than stellar quality work when I was between regular smiths due to their retirement(s) and finding a new go to smith.

The winners circle? Given how few folks are using L-Ws the odds are rather long. And considering that I'm not aware of any top competitor using one, the odds are longer yet. I'm forced to work most weekends so my ability to make any match is rather limited and those are primarily local. The competition is still fairly stiff and yet I've still managed to win a couple. I'm not that good so I have to credit the equipment to a large degree.
 
Rust,

what twist rate are you running and what bullet(s) do you plan using?

There are some F-Class shooters running L-W barrels in the UK too, but as with you, most gunsmiths won't touch them

Laurie,
York, England
 
Laurie - First barrel is a 1-8, and can shoot either the Berger 22422 80 gr or the 22824 82 gr. The chambering is optimized for the 82 gr bullet but should be able to do equally well with the 80. The 82 is a much more forgiving bullet to tune and the BCs are essentially equal. This barrel is primarily for mid range.

Second barrel is a 1-7 for the Berger 22426 90 gr, more of an experiment to see if I can get it to work with an eye towards 1,000.

One of the guys using a .223 has shot best overall score at one of the local match venues several times, and has recently reset the overall record score for that range. He pulled one shot at 1,000 or he might have shot clean which is something that has never been done at that range regardless of chambering. So in the right hands and under the right conditions a .223 will get it done.
 
Rust,


Second barrel is a 1-7 for the Berger 22426 90 gr, more of an experiment to see if I can get it to work with an eye towards 1,000.

Snap! Doing the same thing over here - just got the barrel and hope to have the rifle in a few weeks.

One of the guys using a .223 has shot best overall score at one of the local match venues several times, and has recently reset the overall record score for that range. He pulled one shot at 1,000 or he might have shot clean which is something that has never been done at that range regardless of chambering. So in the right hands and under the right conditions a .223 will get it done.

That's very encouraging. I don't know of anybody who's used the .223 at this range in the UK. (Myself apart. I used an SSR-15 - manually operated AR15 type rifle - in the early days of F-Class at every range from 300-1,000yd. People thought I was mad and still do.)

Good luck, and we can pm each other in due course with how we get on.

Laurie,
York, England
 
Laurie - There have been a few people who have been doing some fairly amazing things with a .223 over the last year or two.

Jerry Tierney pulled quite the upset with a light rifle (basically a .223 chambered Palma rifle with scope) at a 1,000 yard benchrest match winning every catagory in light gun and two out of three in heavy gun. Jerry has done quite well the last few years on the west coast regardless of what he's been shooting.

Over the last ten or fifteen years I've stopped looking for "magic" bullet/powder/primer/cartidge of the day solutions and have instead worked on optimizing everything to best effect as an integrated system. It's worked a couple of times so far, and I'm hoping for success in applying the same principle again.
 
Butch - He did indeed pretty much clean hoouse with a .284 about two years back. That result contributed to the current shift towards the straight .284 and variants.

More recently he has accomplished pretty much the same thing with a .223 and he seemed to be very satisfied with the results. Most of it is posted over on the long range site. He did a lot of testing and developement in the process. If he showed up to a match with a Daisy I probably wouldn't bet against him given his track record.

I'd been considering a .223 for awhile just to have an rifle to shoot in a couple of informal matches that have a .223 only class just to get a little more trigger time in. Once I sort of finalized the concept I started doing research and found Jerry had already developed and tested almost everything I was thinking about. Almost. I hope one idea I have pans out, I'd like to be able to say I had at least one original successful thought.
 
So what your saying is that you'll have a rifle for each class at HardRock ? I'm still waiting for a scope that will defeat the mirage !! Especially those bouncy, wavy targets so low at 900 !!

Maybe I'll still be around to see the new setup.
Good luck
 
Butch - Better than that, he's a good guy.

Will - You've hit the nail on the head. Given that I've had to work every weekend so far this year that there has been a match anywhere. The way I figure it is that by shooting in .223 class and factory class (or F/TR) I'll be warmed up by the time anything goes class (or F) comes up. Given that my open rifle is as good as it gets a little warm up might go a long way.

Now beating Steve in .223 class might be an awfully hard row to hoe from the results I've seen the last few matches. He's getting just a little scary. I'd settle for not zeroing out the first match with a new rifle and no practice or dope.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,258
Messages
2,214,849
Members
79,496
Latest member
Bie
Back
Top