Alex Wheeler
Site $$ Sponsor
6mm firewalker
From an accuracy point of view, I do not think that neck length is an issue, but there is an advantage as far as barrel life goes. There is a something called Turbulence Point theory. The upshot of it is that if you project the angles of the inside of the shoulder to the center line of the neck, from opposite sides, that having them meet within the neck will result in longer throat life. An example might be comparing the .243 with the 6mm Rem. as far as barrel life.Just a simple question from a guy who's far less expert than most on this forum: Does the neck length really matter that much? Here's why I ask: The Wilson chamber-type neck-sizing die that I use only sizes down the last .1875" of the neck, stopping well short of the shoulder while still providing plenty of bearing surface for bullet/neck contact. This leaves some of the neck (about .10") expanded, which I assume improves the centering of the case in the chamber.
From an accuracy point of view, I do not think that neck length is an issue, but there is an advantage as far as barrel life goes. There is a something called Turbulence Point theory. The upshot of it is that if you project the angles of the inside of the shoulder to the center line of the neck, from opposite sides, that having them meet within the neck will result in longer throat life. An example might be comparing the .243 with the 6mm Rem. as far as barrel life.
Recently a new case has made its way into the field of long range benchrest, the BRA Which is an Ackleyized version of the 6mm BR Norma/Lapua case that has had its shoulder angle increased from 30 degrees to 40 degrees with the same neck length as the parent case. This case has slightly less (1 gr. ?) capacity than the Dasher that has the same shoulder angle but a shorter neck, and preliminary comparisons show that visible throat change comes sooner with the Dasher than the BRA.
I don't know...There are lots of variables in terms of barrel life other than neck length and shoulder angle. If the gains were large, it'd be a bigger issue, but I don't think they are, if they even exist. If long barrel life is the goal, one of the small 30's excel here, or one could simply load down to save barrel life. These small cartridges used in short range br are not model T's, but rather, they're top fuel dragsters and like pressure. It's but one price we pay for tiny groups. Again, if the difference is considerable and not at all subjective to other factors,...that's another story. I just don't think it is.On top of the .243 to 6mm Rem comparison, the Remmie holds several grains more powder which would further bolster your statement.
From a first hand, real world anecdotal perspective:.I have a Bud who has hundreds of thousands of rds launched in the dog fields of yore using well smithed barrels on the top tier actions. Apples to apples, he said he always got better bbl life from the 6mm REM over the .243, AI to AI or original configuration to original. Maybe neck length considered with the shoulder angle is a viable variable to consider.