Wikipedia says that the length of a ppc is 1,515 and the rim is .445 and ARC length is 1.490 and rim is ,441 that is the ARC is .025 shorter . So basely the same case . Right ?
Art, it appears wiki is using case oal rather than the headspace to datum. And in order to compare apples to apples, we need to look at saami chamber specs. Now, that gets even more complicated by the fact that a PPC is not saami approved so doesn't offer drawings to compare. It's a wildcat and can technically be just about anything. But for simplicity's sake, I have a "standard" ppc reamer print that shows hs dimension to the .350 datum point of the shoulder to be
1.1451.
(FWIW, I also have prints that call for a .330 datum! Effectively the same but measured from different datum lines. Go figure.)
Saami 6arc to the same .350 datum is
1.1901. So, the 6 ARC is .045 LONGER to the same point than a 6 PPC.
To complicate things a bit further, the 22 ARC is longer than either of them @
1.2201, exactly the same as a 6.5 Grendel.
So, a 6 ARC is .045 longer than a ppc and a 22 ARC is .075 longer than a PPC.
You are correct in saying the difference in capacity of a 6PPC and a 6 ARC is negligible but the oal wiki gave you isn't really relative nor set in stone. I have ppc prints for different oal dimensions! Remember, it's a wildcat, so neither is right or wrong, but are different. And I've seen others dimensions for oal with them. It amounts to trim length for YOUR PPC chamber.
You can look up saami cartridge and chamber specs here but a PPC being a wildcat, you'll have to source it elsewhere. Just remember to compare chamber specs to chamber specs, not chamber to cartridge.
Below is a ppc case and calipers set .045 longer...for a visual.
