6BR is not this complicated.
YEP! that is exactly what I do @ time before reloading a case...Wet tumbling does 3 things:
cleans it very good
removes the carbon from inside the neck, this increases neck tension and reduces consistency
dings up the end of the case mouth, needs a mandrel run in to true mouth and requires chamfering
Frank
If I might make a comment about the Peterson annealing line...Just a quick update, I picked up all of my pin gauges came in. Used my upright belt sander with 400grit to taper them with my drill running counter to the sandpaper. Then I used my dremel with the felt wheel and extra fine buffing compound. The Lapua even after annealing has some serious spring back and ended up having to use the .243 pin BUT it seems my seating issues are gone.
On another note, the Peterson brass came in and visually and by weight out of 50 they only have a 3/10 grain variance in weight. By looking at the annealing line it is clear they use some kind of collar or heat shield as each piece of brass has a perfect annealing line.
A quick test with the lapua yesterday showed my flyers are all but gone at 30.2 gr of varget. I just finished loading up both lapua and Peterson and heading back to the range to play with seating depth on the Lapua and charge weight on the Peterson. I se some folks are saying the internal capicity on the Peterson is less so I am starting at 29.6 and working up to 30.2.
A word of warning on using the pin gauges, be VERY careful. If you run to far the case will hit the collet and ding it. Yea, learned that the hard way....lol. I am going to order the die and mandrel set but I am still ahead of the game as the pin gauges were only 3.30 each and was able to order them from a local company suncoast tools which is only 30 minutes south of me.
Sorry for the long winded post but I wanted to make sure to say THANK YOU, you guys are the best.
Not too keen on that carbide burr as it is really easy to remove too much material and the chamfer will be still too acute. Perhaps chamfering the case mouth to a knife edge if used too vigorously.I have to ask ChuckWagon about a couple things...
The first is how you are chamfering the inside case mouth. The cheap neck deburr tools sold for this purpose do not in my mind have an ideal cutting angle and worst yet, they are not sharp enough to do a really nice job of it. I've been using 1/4" shank cone shaped carbide burrs to do the inside and feel it is a game changer for how it improves seating pressure.
If you do this lightly after stainless media tumbling you will not have any problems with dented case mouths.
![]()
The next thing is with regard to sizing bushings...
What is your sizing process?
If you are currently not neck turning then any neck wall stock variability will transfer to the inside and influence neck tension variability.
The next variable is case to case hardness variability. This affects spring back.
Here's a trick you can try that will almost certainly sort out the problem... I hope I'm clear enough for you to understand.
This works best with a neck only sizing die. An FL die will not allow you to feel this, but it still occurs.
You need to size and resize the necks in 0.001" increments, not just one pass for all cases. Neck turned brass will reduce the range of bushing sizes you will need.
Start with a neck sizing bushing that is at least one size too large to hold a bullet after sizing. With a normal factory chamber you will notice the case is easy to draw out of the bushing. This is because reducing a neck by 0.012 diameter in a single pass creates a taper to the neck side wall. When you draw the case out of the bushing there will be no resistance and you can feel it. The next step will reduce that neck taper.
Now size the cases again with the next bushing smaller. This time, you will feel the resistance when you retract the ram as the neck side wall is now parallel after sizing.
At this point using a bullet as a go/nogo gage, set aside any case that is tight enough that you cannot push the bullet into the neck by hand. Keep those in one bowl and all lose mouth cases in a separate bowl.
After you run the batch, reduce the neck sizing bushing one more size, and run all the cases from both bowls again.
At this point, the bowl that was already tight with a bullet has at least 0.001" neck tension and the side walls are parallel. These are ready to load.
Repeat this process until all cases have been sized with a bushing that is 0.001 smaller than what it takes to hold a bullet.
If you think about what this does, it sorts cases according to two factors...
1) case to case variations in neck hardness
2) case to case neck wall thickness variation
My guess is that this process will result in significantly more consistent seating pressure.
This was essentially my process for processing brass for F Class before I started running tight neck chambers and neck turning.
I think this is something important that rarely gets mentioned here: the need to measure CBTO on each seated round and to adjust for consistency. You’d get the impression from the interweb mavens that because their process is so refined, and “neck tension” so controlled, they adjust their die on round 1 then seat the next 100 without checking, and their CBTO variance is all within .0005Well, for all the worry & resources you could spend on this, a couple kernels of powder one way or another might solve enough. Full seating testing usually solves a lot. Primer testing/striking can fix a lot.
Advanced reloading only works AFTER basic reloading.
If your seating forces obviously vary, but you measure each round and followup to set each at tested best CBTO, then a friction variance to seating(if that's the cause) makes no difference.
Best way to combat his is to leave the carbon layer inside necks alone.
If the cause is thickness variance, then you can measure this with a ball mic and cull out offenders.
If the cause is brass hardness, you can process anneal and minimal size to fix it.
If you normalize these items, taking all to standard, THEN you can expect seating force variance to comparatively indicate tension variance. Of course you can't do anything about that if seating bullets to discover it. That's where mandrels can provide one of their benefits. Mandrels can be used in a pre-seating operation, and show you things before seating actual bullets. This, giving you an opportunity to act on it.
I've been using mandrels for primary expansion, and as a pre-seating operation, long before mandrel use was cool. And a long time ago I did testing with various sensors and software to see what was going on.
I also decided a long time ago that I would develop a direct hoop tension measuring rig. But I just never got around to it...
What I settled on is basic reloading really (sound load development), and matching of pre-seating forces in normalized neck conditions. I stopped at load cell sensing inside a Sinclair expander die, feeding a basic meter circuit. With this, I'm confident that I see tension variance, and I adjust this to matching through neck sizing LENGTH. The interference I typically run with is 1thou, with a bushing, Wilson die, and never a length of sizing exceeding seated bullet bearing.
So before I seat actual bullets, I know their seating forces are matching all others, and I still check CBTO with every round, as that still needs sneaking into here & there.
My annealing, is dip annealing. I don't do it very often, don't need to, as my sizing is always minimal.
View attachment 1290106