Viht N150 works very well in the cartridge, at least with the 123gn Scenar, although not giving as much velocity as N550 which also usually works well. (On the other hand, N150 probably gives more barrel life.) I'm about to try N150 with the Berger 130 VLD and the new 136gn Scenar, but I suspect it'll be difficult to improve much on the 123's results. (It's a VERY efficient bullet too ballistically with a form factor value of 0.950 (almost as low as the 130 Berger's 0.944) according to Bryan Litz's tests. Being lighter, its BC is down a bit of course, but 0.265 G7 is still amazing for such a little bullet, and it has a much larger dia. meplat than the Berger, so will benefit noticeably from a bit of pointing.
The comments on IMR-4007ssc are interesting. I'll give it a try as I have some on hand that was bought for .308 with heavies but didn't produce the velocities I wanted.
The UK is a VarGet and H4350/H4831 etc free country and has been since last summer, so there has been a lot of looking for alternative powders here too and not just for this cartridge. There is no chance of H4895 / IMR-8208 XBR for 308 win with 155s for instance and hasn't been for many months. Our IMR / Hodgdon importer only gets one main shipment per year from the US plus a second smaller one usually, but 2013 saw stocks sold out as soon as received, presumably as some orders were only partly fulfilled by Hodgdon Powder.
I can still get Czech manufactured Lovex SO65 and SO70 here, the latter being what used to be called Accurate 4350, so will try them in 6.5X47L. SO65 is a stick powder shown as having an identical burning rate to VarGet, but in my experience is a bit bulkier and bit slower burning, so can't be substituted in cartridges like 308 without seeing too big a drop in velocities. I doubt if it'll be great in the 6.5 as I don't think the case has enough room to suit it, but might suit .260 Rem and 6.5 Creedmoor with lighter bullets. I notice a lot of posts talking about this powder's burning rate matching another's and it therefore being assumed that that it's an automatic replacement. I'd say DON'T to these people. Burning rates are only a guide and there's no guarantee at all that two powders with similar burning rates will be equally well matched to a particular cartridge + bullet combination. All it tells you is that it's a possibility, but I learned years ago the hard way (wasting powder, bullets, and barrels) that this is all too often a delusion. There are definitely other elements in the mix that also determine whether a grade works really well or not.
In the US, Western Powders now sources its 'Accurate' brand powders from somebody new, but if you guys can still get the 4350 version, it's an alternative possibility. The 'old' (SO70) version that we have works very well in cartridges that like the 4350s, but many handloaders of my acquaintance used to shun it (in the happy days when powder supplies were plentiful and you actually had a choice of makes) as it's rather long-grained and didn't flow through mechanical powders measure well.