lol nope^^^^^^^^
I just might add the words “hard cast”.
Straight WW
Never had leading problem with my bullets, commercial cast before I cast my own yes.
Either way the animals didn’t seem to care
lol nope^^^^^^^^
I just might add the words “hard cast”.
History lesson time. When cap and ball revolvers were being converted to cartridge firing they first loaded the cases with heeled bullets just like the .22 LR is still loaded today, i.e. the OD of the case diameter and exposed bullet diameter are the same. When S&W designed the .44 Russian No. 3 revolver for the Russian Empire, their bureau of ordinance rep didn't like the outside lubricated heeled lead bullets and insisted that the bullet be seated inside the cartridge case. So they reduced the diameter of the lead bullets to fit down in the case with the lube/lube grooves protected inside the cartridge case walls. If you look at a cartridge drawing of a .38 Special/.357 mag the OD of the cartridge case is .379" which is why they called it a .38 because it's parent case used .38 cal heeled bullets. The .44 Russian case was lengthened to make the .44 special, and again to make the .44 Mag which all sprang from the Russian case from 1870-ish.Exactly my thought too … I always have felt that 44 magnum/special is overrated and therefore will never own one. It’s actually .429” so why did the person that invented those named them 44 instead of 43? Only logical answer is for marketing reason (read: misleading those less suspecting) and therefore I refuse to support this dishonest behavior in my view.