My understanding was that the main difference was the reduced sulphur content. This is one of many cases where my knowledge is limited at best though. WH
Would it pay to go carbide reamer, at least a rougher?Probably. For the home smith don't worry about it. For us working guys an extra $2 cost per chamber is the cost of doing business.
I don't think it's needed. With HSS core drill I get 300+ chambers. I take finish reamers offline between 60-80 chambers for 416R steel. If that drops to 40-60, so what.Would it pay to go carbide reamer, at least a rougher?
I don't think it's needed. With HSS core drill I get 300+ chambers. I take finish reamers offline between 60-80 chambers for 416R steel. If that drops to 40-60, so what.
Now if we bring in LW barrels, it's a different conversation.
Borden recievers are 416.. I think for as longs as I can remeber Borden Actions are 17-4 if purchased as SS actions. I think my now ancient Nesika Bay Action might have been 17-4 but I can not recall now.
LW-50Did you mean Lother Walther's magic steel?
You make some great points, especially concerning the actual quality of the steel as a result of the Manufacturing process.LW-50
I've done some reading on LW-50, wondering if I want to try one
I've heard many Smiths will cuss at it when trying to chamber it
Also - they may last twice as long, but I have not read about them being much more accurate
So for accuracy buffs, they would rather buy and use up 2 Kriegers/Bartleins for the same price as
One LW-50
Info taken from here Post #22
LW-50 = 410 stainless. (no Sulfur)Lothar Walther vs Krieger barrels
Top F-Class and benchrest gunsmiths in Europe do not use Lothar Walther if other barrels are available (or rather the time to wait for US parts is acceptable). Even in Germany Lothar Walther doesn't have the reputation to be the best. Many US manufacturers are regarded at least as high as LW or...www.longrangehunting.com
Disclaimer: Alloy isn't everything. The quality and properties of each can very quite a bit. Grain refinement and how well the alloying elements are dispersed (precipitated within the iron matrix) or dissolved if you would. If a steel is cooled too slow they can form groups and carbides (like rocks in concrete) that can give an area of weakness. If cooled to fast, cracks can propagate and cause differential hardening, which stresses the steel, or simply too hard (too much detail to explain here).
What's that mean and why? The reason is complex, but not hard to understand. The most obvious is the .6% sulfur in 416. The sulfur is an issue; it can lump together in pockets or areas where it is richer then others. This makes it super easy to cut in one area, and a difficult in another. But more over, it burns...yes, imagine that. So as you shoot, very hot gas (up to 4500 degrees for a nanosecond) burn the sulfur out and create pockets or pitting in your barrel. It also aids in corrosion in that area. So, it is necessary to VAR (vacuum arc remelt) or remelt the steel to refine it. This helps, but there is still sulfur in your steel.
410 is sulfur free, for the most part. So it solves two of those issues right away, but also the supply LW gets is very high quality 410 with uniform grain and very good properties.
Sulfur is a lubricant. It is a great aid to machining. It is the base we commonly know a Moly or moly lube, which is Molybdenum Disulfide. This is why 416R cuts so well and uniformly...but would it give you better properties to your barrel life, no.
This is the reason 416R cuts so much better, and why LW pulls or pushes a button to make their barrels.
Another reason is LW barrels are all tight. Yes, they are usually about a full thousandth tight. This gives a better gas seal that reduces gas blow-by, which is the #1 cause of barrel erosion.
Studies show 70-85% of barrel wear is from gas erosion. Unless the barrel is super heated (above working temp of that steel), then the rifling is simply smashed down.
didnt the lands chip the flutes because they were so hard??Jackie, didn't you win one in the old days and then gifted it to another shooter. Pete Pieper chambered many of them for a so called gun writer and told horror stories about the large difference in bore and groove diameter.
I only chambered a couple. I used more speed and feed. It was not the easiest to chamber and they were mediocre shooters.didnt the lands chip the flutes because they were so hard??
400 series of some kind. They're magnetic.What steel did Remington use to forge those stainless barrels on the 700's? The ones with the nice ripples from one end to the other. WH
idk but i had some that would shoot!What steel did Remington use to forge those stainless barrels on the 700's? The ones with the nice ripples from one end to the other. WH
Yes. That was quite some time back.Jackie, didn't you win one in the old days and then gifted it to another shooter. Pete Pieper chambered many of them for a so called gun writer and told horror stories about the large difference in bore and groove diameter.
He was a jerk, wasn't his name Woody at LW or were you speaking of the so called writer?Yes. That was quite some time back.
I cannot remember the name of guy that was pushing the LW barrels back then, but I bought one in 1-14 twist for 6PPC, chambered it, and it was not competitive. As I remember, it machined a lot like 17-4, which we cut a lot of at my Shop?
Then, I had one that was donated as a prize and just gave it to someone, I can’t remember who.