• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

300 Win Mag flyers

There seems to be no shortage of threads about flyers on this forum so I apologize for adding mine to the list but I wanted to share it with everyone because the pattern was so consistent. I’m working up a hunting load for my Remington 700p in 300 Win Mag. The barrel has been shortened to 20” and I shoot suppressed with a SilencerCo Hybrid. Everything else about the rifle is stock. I’m using a Nightforce NXS 3.5-15 x 50 mm scope with beefy scope rings on a Nightforce 20 MOA picatinny rail. I’m using ABM brass, H1000, Hornady 212 gr ELD-X bullets and CCI 250 primers. I full length resized the brass with a Hornady Custom Grade die (with an elliptical expander). I chamfer and deburred the case mouths, prime using a Frankford Arsenal Perfect Primer hand primer, carefully load powder with an RCBS balance beam scale that’s been calibrated with a check weight set, and seat the bullets with a Hornady Custom Grade die. I seat them 0.124” off the lands so they’ll fit in PMAGs (I want to swap the stock for a chassis with a DBM some day). I’ve played around with seating depths going from 0.020 off the lands to 0.124” and the 0.124’s can group just as good as the others in my rifle.

From my initial load development I saw a good group at 77.7 gr of H1000 (see Chart 1). I loaded up some more rounds honing in around the 77.7 gr range. I loaded three 3-round groups at 77.6, 77.7 and 77.8 gr for a total of 27 rounds using the same method as described previously.

I cleaned my barrel using a carbon cleaner (M Pro7), cleaning rod and bore guide. When I got to the range I shot 6 foulers (3 with factory HSM ammo and 3 with factory ABM). Interestingly the groups weren’t that great, but there didn’t seem to be any flyers with either of these 3-shot groups (see Target1).

I was shooting off front and rear sand bags that weren’t too full. I typically used the rear bag for elevation adjustment. My chronograph was a Labradar. I shot a 3-round group and then let the barrel cool for ~5 min while I shot my other rifle. As you can see in Target2 each and every 3-shot group has the same pattern. 2 shots that are touching (or almost touching) with a 3rd shot that’s a flyer. I just thought that was an amazing coincidence that all nine 3-shot groups exhibited that same pattern. By the way the 3rd shot was not always the flyer. Sometimes it was the 1st or 2nd shot. And although I didn’t document which shot on the target corresponded to which muzzle velocity I want to say I didn’t see a correlation at the range. At the range I would take the shot and then look at the Labradar. Sometimes I would see a high or low MV and think it would be a flyer only to look through my scope and see it touching the other bullet hole. Also the flyers seemed to be in a random orientation relative to the two "good" shots.

From Chart 2 you can see I’m getting the best groups with 77.8 gr this time. Also as has been mentioned on other threads in this forum there’s no correlation between ES’s and group size (see Chart 3). Interestingly my average muzzle velocity did not increase going from 77.7 to 77.8 grains. Median MV did not increase either.

From reading other threads about flyers some of the remedies that members have suggested include switching to neck sizing using a collet die, checking bullets for consistency of ogive length, free floating the barrel, changing the barrel, adjusting the firmness of the sand bags and ensuring a consistent shooting position (to list a few).

The fact that the first two 3-shot groups with the factory ammo did not seem to have flyers like my hand loads suggests to me that the problem lies in my hand loads themselves and not in the rifle or shooting technique. So I guess I’ll just have to go through my reloading components and processes one by one until I find the culprit.

So any suggestions on where to start? I really like the ELD-X’s but I’m open to Bergers or others. It seems like lots of people get good results using H1000 with 300 Win Mag so I would think it’s not the powder. Do match primers really make a difference? Should I be checking concentricity? Deburring flash holes? Oy, the list goes on and on…


Target1.jpg Target2.jpg Chart 1 - GroupvPowder.jpg Chart 2 - GroupvPowder.jpg Chart 3 - ESvGroup.jpg
77.6 2793

77.6 2811

77.6 2831

77.6 2818

77.6 2828

77.6 2842

77.6 2825

77.6 2833

77.6 2856

77.7 2835

77.7 2844

77.7 2854

77.7 2840

77.7 2849

77.7 2860

77.7 2842

77.7 2846

77.7 2864

77.8 2842

77.8

77.8 2851

77.8 2837

77.8 2844

77.8 2865

77.8 2840

77.8 2847

77.8 2859
 
My experience w/300 win mag is, with 2 of them, Both shot best with IMR7828. One was a A-Bolt that wouldn't start grouping until after 15-20 shots. I wasn't just cleaning too much, I was cleaning too throughly w/wipeout & JB. The other, a older win model 70 gave me no problems. I shot at least a 4 shot group @ 200 yards with an OCW test. I used the now rarely seen GM215M primers with 180 nosler partitions. Half MOA.
I loaded a 300 WSM that loved the berger 210's & 185's. Might try a different bullet weight. Hope this little bit helps. Good Luck!
 
H-1000 is great powder for 210s &215 Bergers, so I doubt it's the powder.

What I do suspect is the eld-x. I can not speak to the 212 gr. 30 cal, but I have measured and sorted thru 500 each of 6.5 & 7mm eld-x. Big weight and BTO variances plus meaningful diameter variance. I thought it was just my lots, but some research found many are having the same problems.

The eld-match bullets don't seem to have the same problems, but I prefer the Berger 215s for 300 wm hunting. JMO
 
I would say to try another limited test with either the Berger 210 or 215 as a comparo.

Another thing to test is RL22. ALL of the 300 Win Mags that I have worked with like it best. BUT>>>> That was before some of the new powders (RL26, RL23, ect.) came out.

Question on your load development.....did you see any other 2 & 1's while you were testing with the 212's?

Tod
 
Thanks for all the feedback everyone. I think I will give the Berger 210 VLDs a try with the H1000 and see what happens. I measured and weighed 10 random ELD-X's and they were all within 0.001" variance length to ogive and less than 0.1 grain variance except one was 0.2 gr off, but maybe there's something else that keeps them from grouping better with my rifle. If I still see it happening with the Bergers then I might look at the powder, but I only have a few weeks until my elk hunt.

Scooterbum: what do you mean by h.s. tolerances?

The first round of tests I did see the 2 & 1's to a lesser extent. About half of them grouped that way. (The "MC" means Mag Compatible meaning those were loaded 0.124" off the lands. The others were 0.020" off the lands.)
Target01.jpg
Thanks,
Tom
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,968
Messages
2,207,171
Members
79,237
Latest member
claydunbar
Back
Top