• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

.260 REM vs. .243

I know this answer isn't what you asked, but I am pretty sure that Cooper will make a 6.5x47 Lapua and assuming that you reload, or don't mind paying for Lapua factory ammo, it is a great choice for what you are talking about. The brass from them is amazing and will probably last you a lifetime for regular hunting and the occasional range trip.
 
look at the sectional density of a 260 round at around 130 gr. and then look at the same on a 30 caliber bullet at around 180 to 190 gr. The little 260 has excellent sectional density, bone crushing ability ;)
 
Ive shot deer wth everything from 223 to 375 and shot placement counts with all those calibers. I settled on the 243 with 95 or 100gr Nosler Partitions in order to get two holes. Mostly its been one shot 1 deer. The 260 has the advantage of bigger holes from the start and heavier bullets so it is a more than adequate deer cartridge. The 243 will be available in many more shapes sizes and models than the 260. Brass will be more readily found also. Recoil as stated is pretty close around 10 ft# V 12ft#. Target shooting if done in the same manner without overheating the barrel, the 260 will or should last longer. Its kind ofa wash, with the 260 being a tad better for deer and the 243 having more variety with velocities over 3700 fps available. I prefer the 243 buts just my preference.
 
I have seen deer and elk killed with both the 243 and 260. None were any more dead than the next, and all went less than 75yds after impact. Shot placement is more important than caliber selection.

That being said, and currently owning rifles chambered in both 243 and 260 Rem, if I had to choose between them, I would go with 260 over the 243.
 
olympian said:
For deer at 100-200 yds, you will never know the difference and neither will the target. With that in mind, I would get the 243 Winchester and enjoy the light recoil. I really like the 260 Remington in rifles and pistols, but if 200 yds is the max, then it is all splitting hairs.

+1

To the Original Poster....You are in the enviable position of either one will suit you well. I just prefer the 243 due to many years of experience with it. I have a 6.5-06 but still prefer the 243 for deer.

Lastly, the 85gr HPBT Sierra out of the 243 is my first choice combination for deer hunting. Excellent bullet!! WD
 
The 85 grain Sierra HPBT is an excellent bullet for whitetails. I have seen many deer and bear killed with this bullet. All one shot kills and very seldom do they move off the spot. Almost all shots are pass through with good blood loss. This was with both 6MM and 243. Matt
 
Out of the two mentioned, I would pick (and already have done so) the 243 win.
For deer and targets out to a couple hundred yards, I'll take the lighter recoil, bullet speed, and accuracy of the 243.
When the 260 came out, I recall reading and hearing locally about deer running a good ways after being hit with the popular 140 grain bullet. That was because a lot of those 140 grainers were meant for cartridges pushing them out at a much higher velocity (264 Win mag; 6.5-06; etc.)
The 243 pushes bullets from 85 - 100 grains at a velocity that is high enough to cause good bullet expansion....that is what kills (not a high B.C. number). I have killed quite a few with the 95 grain ballistic tip out of the 243Win. and the 240 Wby. Plenty of bullet expansion and complete pass through shots, super accurate.
I get a kick out of reading threads about how the 223 is a great killer and then the next thread calls out that the 243 is no good! Too funny :o
When it's all said and done...both will kill if you hit them in the right place with a good bullet.
Just my 2 cents....
Gary
 
Replying to the point about 260 brass availability; yes, you're right. Finding .260 Rem brass can be a chore, and sometimes a costly one.

So I use Winchester/Hornady 7-08 brass, and run it through the .260 Rem F/L resizing die. In one step, I have brass that's ready for fireforming.

Greg
 
I'd get the 260, for all the positives stated above. With regard to brass availability, with a hunting rifle you only need to find Winchester (or Lapua) brass I stock once, buy 200 cases and you are set for a decade.
 
JarheadNY said:
Replying to the point about 260 brass availability; yes, you're right. Finding .260 Rem brass can be a chore, and sometimes a costly one.

So I use Winchester/Hornady 7-08 brass, and run it through the .260 Rem F/L resizing die. In one step, I have brass that's ready for fireforming.

Greg


You can also use 243 brass, just run it through the 260 F/L sizing die with the expander ball in.
 
Yes, one may neck .243 brass up, but I do have a specific preference for sourcing my 260 brass from 7-08.

Quite some years back, the discussion became heated regarding sourcing 260 from .243 vs 7-08. Necking up was accused of creating donuts.

I did both initially, and never encountered any blatant evidence of donuts. But I still switched to 7-08 exclusively, just to be on the safe side.

As it happens, I buy what's on the shelf, and mainly, lately, it's been 7-08 anyway. My current brass is recent Hornady 7-08. So far, I've fired half of it one time only; so the jury's till out. But I think I'm going to like it.

Greg
 
I live in WI and I have had both 260 and 243 in my possession at the same time. There IS a difference in the 2. I no longer have the 243 and own 5 260s.

You stated you will be reloading so ammo is a moot point. Don't worry about the high BC pills for hunting. Just get a reliable bullet and fill the pickup. 100gr bullets at 3350fps, 120s at almost 3000fps and 140s easily 2750. Dont worry about the recoil because it is not very stiff, not much more than a 243.

I own other rifles in various chamberings bigger and smaller but pick the 260 almost every time. My wife loves hers also.
 
It seems from what I have read that necking down 308 brass was where the majority of doughnut problems were. Around here once fired 243 brass is much easier to find than 7-08. I'll try some if I find it.
 
justinp61 said:
It seems from what I have read that necking down 308 brass was where the majority of doughnut problems were. Around here once fired 243 brass is much easier to find than 7-08. I'll try some if I find it.


Doughnuts are the result of the thicker bras that makes up the shoulder becoming part of the neck when necked UP. Necking down will however, result in thicker neck brass.
 
Prefer .243 for coyote but here in south Ontario like other areas in North America wild hogs are becoming a problem. The Ministry in charge of hunting is telling Ontario hunters this Fall if you see a hog, shoot it.

Bought a .260 Savage Trophy Hunter thinking the heavier bullet would be better for hogs. My thought is the 120 gr Barnes TTSX for punching through the chest grissle.

My .243 Axis shoots consistently tighter groups on paper than the .260 Savage, 1/2 moa compared to 1 moa but can`t complain about that. Plenty good enough for hunting.

For .260 brass I pull bullets from 7-08 Win factory and neck down. Use the 7-08 bullets in my 7-08 Axis which is legal for deer and moose in north Ontario. There is an arbitrary .275 restriction in south Ontario for coyote and chucks brought in at the same time as shotgun-only for deer in the south in the 1950s. This was mainly due to the sudden availability of really cheap .303 Lee-Enfields and hard ball ammo at the end of the Korean War which was shooting up the country side.

So the .243 and .260 are both legal for coyote in the south and now the .260 looks like a better choice for tough critters like hogs.
 
I would go with the .244 caliber. The good old 243 is good but the 6mm Remmy is better. I have owned several 6mm's (6mmBR, 243, 243AI, 6mm Remmington, 6mm/284 and 240 Weatherby). Of them all I liked the 6mm/284 best and that is what I still own.

I have owned several 260's and just never got the accuracy I thought I should even in custom guns. I also find the recoil of the 260 to be much stouter than the 6mm's especially with 140 class bullets.

YMMV
 
Have to agree with the better accuracy of the 6mms.

Best long range F Class cartridge I have used over the past 10 years is the 6mm Rem Ack. Imp. Felt like I didn`t even have to try at 1000 yds. Just kept drilling the center of the target.

Thought the 6AI was so great why not neck it up to 6.5mm. Actually used .257 Roberts brass for both cartridges. Not much of a neck down or up. But just never got the same consistent easy accuracy with the 6.5AI and 142 MKings compared to the 6AI with 107 MKings. Used a Shilen barrel for both.

Am experiencing the same accuracy difference with the .243 Axis with modified stock trigger compared to the .260 Savage 11 which has an Accutrigger. But we are talking 1/2 moa compared to 1 moa which some people would argue is splitting hairs in a hunting rifle.

The OP said the rifle would also be used for target work in the off season. A big factor that is seldom mentioned in target rifles is barrel life. In general the larger the bore given the same sized case the longer the barrel life. Compare the barrel life of a .308 to a .243. So theoretically the .260 barrel should last longer than a .243 but that may only be a difference of 100 rounds.

You pays your money and makes your choice.

Bill
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,858
Messages
2,204,353
Members
79,157
Latest member
Bud1029
Back
Top