• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

243Win: brass, brands, weights and velocities.

Greetings from Denmark :)

After reloading for my rifles for ~5yrs I recently reached a stage where I wanted to make a small test if I could see systematic differences in precision and muzzle velocities depending on brass brand and weight.

I had a selection of different brass for my Schultz & Larsen model "Victory" hunting rifle in 243W - http://greatdanerifles.com/. The barrel is a normal hunting barrel profile - Ø:15mm/0.6in at the muzzle. I am using a Sonic 45 suppressor and the rifle is topped with a Meopta R2 2.5-15x56 in QRW rings mounted on a picatinny rail.

All cases were "homogenized": FL sized, annealed, length trimmed, neck-turned, primer pocket reamed, flash hole deburred etc...

I weighed 90 cases of RWS (33), Norma (17), Sako (15), Lapua (12), Remington (10) og Geco (3)

Brand: Count (N) - Average(AVE) - Standard deviation (SD)

Remington: N=10 – AVE: 161,6grs – SD: 0,44
Norma: N=17 – AVE: 164,5grs – SD: 2,4
Lapua: N=12 – AVE: 172,1grs – SD: 0,90
Sako: N=15 – AVE: 171,3grs – SD: 1,6
RWS: N=33 – AVE: 180,1grs – SD: 4,6
(Geco: N=3 – AVE: 183,3grs – SD: 0,06)


HISTOGRAM EXAMPLES
Slide%201.jpg



I selected groups of cases for testing in 5gr intervals for testing for each brand. RWS showed a relatively large variation in weights so I selected two groups - "RWS light" and "RWS heavy" respectively.

HISTOGRAMS OF SELECTED CASE WEIGHTS
Slide%202.JPG

Slide%203.JPG



The testing load was 85grs Sierra GMK, 46grs Norma MRP powder, CCI 250, COL: 66,4mm/2.598in which shows half decent precision in this rifle. This test load is 2grs below my normal hunting load with same components.


SIX SHOT GROUP 85grs SGMK - 0,6MOA
Slide%205.png



Under the assumption that the light Remington cases have the normal 243W 54grs H2O capacity and a brass density of 8.4 g/cc, Quickload can generate a model for the velocities I could expect to measure at the range as the case capacity decreased with increasing weight of the cases.


Quickload chamber pressure/velocity as a function of brass weight (900mps=2953fps / 940mps=3084fps)
Slide_9%20640.jpg


I normally hunt at distances within 200m so I first tested for precision at 100m, shooting a 5-shot group based on 158,8grs Norma, 162,2 Remington, 171,1grs Sako, 173,1grs Lapua and 183,5 Geco cases. Resulting in a 0.39moa 5 shot group, see pictures below. Apparently, precision is fine for hunting within 200m.

5-SHOTS – 5 DIFFERENT CASES
Shot 1 (Norma) centre target, 2 fouling shots lower left.
20160215_121641_A.jpg


SHOT 2 (Remington)
20160215_121812_B.jpg


SHOT 3 (Sako)
20160215_122016_C.jpg


SHOT 4 (Lapua)
20160215_122457_D.jpg


SHOT 5 (GECO + a third shot in fouling group)
20160215_123053_E.jpg


RESULTS
20160215_123053_F_2.jpg


I used a ProChrono Digital chronograph at the range and achieved the following results.

TARGETS FROM CHRONO-RANGE-SESSION (the two flyers in the RWS groups are shooter errors)
Target%201%20Chrono.jpe

Target%202%20Chrono.jpe


Average POI doesn't seem to change significantly in a hunting perspective at 100m.

VELOCITIES 5M FROM MUZZLE
Slide1.JPG


AVERAGE BRASS WEIGHTS AND VELOCITIES (Sako & Lapua are combined, since the weights are similar)
Slide2.JPG


CHRONOGRAPHED AND MODELLED (QL) VELOCITIES AS A FUNCTION OF BRASS WEIGHT
Slide3.JPG


Observations / Interpretation / Conclusion

This standard barrel is faster than QL predictions.

Lowest velocity is from the lightest case (911mps / 2989fps; 161.2grs Remington)

Highest velocity is from the heaviest case (972mps / 3189fps; 183.9grs RWS)

Maximum difference in velocity of the same load in different cases is 61mps / 200fps – obviously a good argument for weight sorting cases for LR shoting as is wellknown

I will need 2.7grs more powder in the lightest case to increase the speed 200fps according to QL, and with a difference in case weight of 22.7grs it appears that 8grs of brass is roughly equivalent to 1gr of MRP powder (slow, magnum type)

I generally weigh my powder to +/- 0.1grs with my RCBS 1500 combo. It follows from the point above, that I ought to weigh my brass to +/- 0.8grs as this will have similar level of consequence on muzzle velocity.

There is a positive correlation between case weight and velocity – Heavier case -> Less volume -> Higher pressure -> Higher velocity.

Within hunting distances (<200m) there will be a max vertical difference of POI of 1.4cm / 0.55in between fastest and slowest projectile. So I conclude that mixing brass can be acceptable for hunting purposes BUT...

Pressure will of course be much different in the different cases, so loads must be developed based on the heaviest cases for obvious safety reasons.

And of course, all this is only valid for this rifle and the limited shooting distances (<200m/218yards) where I hunt.

Any comments ?



PS: please forgive any spelling and language errors...
 
Last edited:
Good info. Ty. The weight of brass in the chamber volume makes a difference. After prep, i sort the same lot/headstamp by 3/10 gr. Makes a difference when the lot variation is 3 to 4 grs overall.
 
Thanks :)

This rifle maker, Schultz & Larsen, might not be known to many outside Scandinavia, so here's a few snaps of what she's been up to through the years...

Set up for wild boar night hunting in Sweden. 9.3x62 Mauser barrel, 3-12 S&B Zenith
_1_SF.JPG


Result
_4_SF.JPG


Testing loads in 6.5x55SE, semi heavy barrel, 4.5-30x50 bushnell Elite 6500 Tactical
_2_SF.jpg


Red fox (200yds) on a frosty morning, 6.5x55SE
_3_SF.jpg
 
Last edited:
Great information here, thought out well. I would like to have seen the average velocities based on 10 or more shots. Three is a small sample size. Great job.
 
Great information here, thought out well. I would like to have seen the average velocities based on 10 or more shots. Three is a small sample size. Great job.

Absolutely right !!

I loaded 5 of each group, but weather was changing between showers and dry all the time last saturday, so I decided to go for initial results rather than a defendable sample size at first.

I will get the last two of each group chrono'ed ASAP and consider a reload/repeat of the same cases.
 
I measured the volume of the fired cases today using this procedure http://forum.accurateshooter.com/threads/case-volume-determination-pic-heavy.3896148/

There is a decent inverse correlation between volume and case weights, correlation coefficient 0.92.

All cases, except RWS heavy, have higher volumes than the 243W standard of 54grs water.

Weight%20vs%20Vol.jpg


The picture becomes more fuzzy when plotting muzzle velocities vs case volume, but the trend is still recognizable, correlation coefficient 0.72 (trend line for all data pooled together)
Vol%20vs%20Vel.jpg
 
Thanks :)

This rifle maker, Schultz & Larsen, might not be known to many outside Scandinavia, so here's a few snaps of what she's been up to through the years...

Set up for wild boar night hunting in Sweden. 9.3x62 Mauser barrel, 3-12 S&B Zenith
_1_SF.JPG


Result
_4_SF.JPG


Testing loads in 6.5x55SE, semi heavy barrel, 4.5-30x50 bushnell Elite 6500 Tactical
_2_SF.jpg


Red fox (200yds) on a frosty morning, 6.5x55SE
_3_SF.jpg
A buddy of mine had a heavy S&L action I tried for years to buy it, it was a heavy duty thick action and smooth this was 20 yrs ago
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,876
Messages
2,185,545
Members
78,548
Latest member
Cptsxteen1
Back
Top