• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

243 load H4350 with nosler bt 90 help

I’m new to this page so bear with me .. I’m working on a load for mi .243 win. I have my brass trimmed 2.040 and was wounding about seating depth .. nosler book calling for 2.680 Hornady 2.640 Hodgdon 2.625 and I have no issues with them seating at 2.690 I check to see where they hit my landing and it’s over the SAMII witch is 2.710 and advice will I be ok to work up a load with OACL @2.690 or should I back it down ?
 
The things to think about when seating bullets are will it fit my magazine. This is mostly an issue if the rifle is to be used hunting.

Next is accuracy. Each rifle is unique, and you will have to test to determine what is best for you.

Also safety can be an issue. If you decide to load a bullet so it is jammed into the lands, work it up slowly because jamming a load can cause serious pressure spikes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: K22
The things to think about when seating bullets are will it fit my magazine. This is mostly an issue if the rifle is to be used hunting.

Next is accuracy. Each rifle is unique, and you will have to test to determine what is best for you.

Also safety can be an issue. If you decide to load a bullet so it is jammed into the lands, work it up slowly because jamming a load can cause serious pressure spikes.

In regards of fitting I’ve checked that they fit and made sure they chamber with ease as for the landing I’d have to set over the magazine so wouldn’t worked and safety bus what I’m mainly concerned with being so different from book to book
 
Seat them as long as possible with out going into the lands and still be able to feed from the magazine.

The 90 gr BalTip is fairly long. Optimal seating depth would be 2.800"+, but that would put them into the rifling (I assume).

When you sit them longer you increase the boiler room of the case thus requiring more powder to reach maximum allowed working pressure.
 
If you're going to reload you need a way to repeatably measure your reloads. Both headspace and where your bullet sets in relationship to the lands. Hornady sells comparator sets to do both. The mag box of your rifle may limit your ability to get close to the lands by forcing you to load short enough to feed from the box. If you're single feeding them Your not limited by this. Measurements from your particular rifle will vary from others "even if it's the exact same rifle".
In a pinch.... you can slice the neck of a sized case with a dremel tool and find the lands by inserting the bullet you're loading in the case and gently closing the bolt on it. When extracting use your finger to keep the ejector compressed and the shell inline as you ease the bolt back .
Using your finger this way keeps your new found measurement from being drug along your chamber and receiver thus possibly seating the bullet deeper. Once you know what you're dealing with you'll know if you constricted by your mag box, or if you can seat long and start @ 0.020? off. You can repeat the test, but you'll need to size the case again to get it to hold the bullet. Here's one I made to answer this question in the past. It's fairly accurate once you understand how to do it.

223 OAL 002.JPG
 
Seat them as long as possible with out going into the lands and still be able to feed from the magazine.

The 90 gr BalTip is fairly long. Optimal seating depth would be 2.800"+, but that would put them into the rifling (I assume).

When you sit them longer you increase the boiler room of the case thus requiring more powder to reach maximum allowed working pressure.

Thank you it’s weird that it varies so much between books and data I’ll definitely post my results
 
While this isn't my preferred bullet for the 243 Win (i.e. 85 Sierra BTHP), I have used the 90 Nosler BT before in the 243 Win with excellent results but I used IMR 4350. Rifle was a Rem 700 which has a lot of free bore so I was never in jeopardy of hitting the lands at a COL of 2.700. There was a lot of jump but the the load shot well (under an inch) in a very wore 243 barrel.

I like at least one bullet diameter (excluding the boat tail portion) of the bullet seated in the neck. I also prefer to be at least .010" from the lands to prevent a bullet becoming stuck in the lands when I extract a live round and to prevent a high pressure situation.

I've never seen the need to seat the bullet into the lands to achieve my accuracy goals. Actually many of my rifles shoot better with a jump - I can't say for sure because I'm not an "expert" but I believe this might be due to not so much because of the jump but because the greater seating depth providing more uniform powder burning and reduction in run out. If you examine some of the premium factory ammo you'll discover that in most the bullet is seated well below the SAMMI max COL. I've seen some amazing groups shot at the range with factory rifles and factory premium ammo.

One of the first things I do with a new rifle is measure the maximum COL for the bullet I intend to use. I measure 3 bullets and use the average of the three. I use a version of the Frankfort Arsenal Tool (mine is home made). It's easy to use, accurate and cheap. I start load develop at .020" off the lands or more if needed to fit the magazine or to obtain at least one bullet diameter seating depth.
 
While this isn't my preferred bullet for the 243 Win (i.e. 85 Sierra BTHP), I have used the 90 Nosler BT before in the 243 Win with excellent results but I used IMR 4350. Rifle was a Rem 700 which has a lot of free bore so I was never in jeopardy of hitting the lands at a COL of 2.700. There was a lot of jump but the the load shot well (under an inch) in a very wore 243 barrel.

I like at least one bullet diameter (excluding the boat tail portion) of the bullet seated in the neck. I also prefer to be at least .010" from the lands to prevent a bullet becoming stuck in the lands when I extract a live round and to prevent a high pressure situation.

I've never seen the need to seat the bullet into the lands to achieve my accuracy goals. Actually many of my rifles shoot better with a jump - I can't say for sure because I'm not an "expert" but I believe this might be due to not so much because of the jump but because the greater seating depth providing more uniform powder burning and reduction in run out. If you examine some of the premium factory ammo you'll discover that in most the bullet is seated well below the SAMMI max COL. I've seen some amazing groups shot at the range with factory rifles and factory premium ammo.

One of the first things I do with a new rifle is measure the maximum COL for the bullet I intend to use. I measure 3 bullets and use the average of the three. I use a version of the Frankfort Arsenal Tool (mine is home made). It's easy to use, accurate and cheap. I start load develop at .020" off the lands or more if needed to fit the magazine or to obtain at least one bullet diameter seating depth.


Thanks you makes since ... I didn’t think of it as more uniform burn for the jump and fortunately I have a hand trimmer so i get to do it all by hand !! Id love a franklin one day but for now good ol hand trimmer
 

Attachments

  • 85653248-E551-44F3-9866-71029B2D751C.jpeg
    85653248-E551-44F3-9866-71029B2D751C.jpeg
    361.6 KB · Views: 28
The velocities are all over the place. Did you chamfer & deburr the case mouths properly ???

What scale did you use for weighing the powder ??

Was all the brass from the same manufacturer and lot # ??
 
The velocities are all over the place. Did you chamfer & deburr the case mouths properly ???

What scale did you use for weighing the powder ??

Was all the brass from the same manufacturer and lot # ??

It was shot 9 and 24 are the same powder charge I worked from 36-38.8 and back down 38.8-36 and every case was debarred and as for the scale it’s a Digital lymen but I also check it with the RCBS beam scale
 
From your notes...

36.0 = 2,810
36.2 = 2,692
36.4 = 2,589
36.6 = 2,574
36.8 = 2,753
37.0 = 2,664
37.2 = 2,718
37.4 = 2,831
37.6 = 2,693
37.8 = 2,757
38.0 = 2,769
38.2 = 2,819
38.4 = 2,996
38.6 = 2,843
38.8 = 2,887

===========================

That's quite the up and down shift in velocities from just 0.2 gr increments.

I'm thinking...

Most likely the problem with the velocity discrepancy is the charge weights are way to low for H-4350 with 90 gr bullet in the 243win.

Hodgdon's H-4350 data STARTS at 42 gr and goes up to 44.5
Speer data with 90 gr starts at 40 and goes to 44 gr
Nosler data for 85/90 gr starts at 36 and goes up to 40


If all else is good...

Either the powder scale is off
or the brass is not of the same brand
or some of the brass has been reloaded more times the others.

OR the Chronograph is too close to the muzzle... that's if it's a chrono that uses the light screens. It should be at least 10 feet away from the muzzle.
 
From your notes...

36.0 = 2,810
36.2 = 2,692
36.4 = 2,589
36.6 = 2,574
36.8 = 2,753
37.0 = 2,664
37.2 = 2,718
37.4 = 2,831
37.6 = 2,693
37.8 = 2,757
38.0 = 2,769
38.2 = 2,819
38.4 = 2,996
38.6 = 2,843
38.8 = 2,887

===========================

That's quite the up and down shift in velocities from just 0.2 gr increments.

I'm thinking...

Most likely the problem with the velocity discrepancy is the charge weights are way to low for H-4350 with 90 gr bullet in the 243win.

Hodgdon's H-4350 data STARTS at 42 gr and goes up to 44.5
Speer data with 90 gr starts at 40 and goes to 44 gr
Nosler data for 85/90 gr starts at 36 and goes up to 40


If all else is good...

Either the powder scale is off
or the brass is not of the same brand
or some of the brass has been reloaded more times the others.

OR the Chronograph is too close to the muzzle... that's if it's a chrono that uses the light screens. It should be at least 10 feet away from the muzzle.


Yeah why I was worried about seating depth because there are a lot of differences and all is once fired brass and each projectile was weighed maybe the chronograph might’ve been a little close but I don’t have many options to work with ..
 

Attachments

  • 5C678FC5-E885-4072-A8BF-3C159AD5924F.gif
    5C678FC5-E885-4072-A8BF-3C159AD5924F.gif
    149.6 KB · Views: 10
What rifle are you shooting these out of ??

Do you know the twist rate ???

The 90 gr Ballistic Tip is a long bullet and I can't see it being very accurate in a 10" twist.
A 9.25" twist or faster would be more optimal for this bullet.
 
What rifle are you shooting these out of ??

Do you know the twist rate ???

The 90 gr Ballistic Tip is a long bullet and I can't see it being very accurate in a 10" twist.
A 9.25" twist or faster would be more optimal for this bullet.

Tikka T3X and I’m not sure believe 1/12 but I also have a 223 that 1/7 and it handled 40 grains way nice !
 
Tikka T3X and I’m not sure believe 1/12 but I also have a 223 that 1/7 and it handled 40 grains way nice !

I think Tikka makes the 243win with a 10" twist which is a hair too slow for optimal stability with the 90 gr BalTip.

I recommend the Siearra 85 gr BTHP Gameking ( # 1530 ). It's a phenomenal bullet for hunting deer and it's VERY accurate.

If you're gonna tinker more with the 90 gr BalTip, I suggest you work up new loads from 40 gr to 42 gr of H-4350
 
What rifle are you shooting these out of ??

Do you know the twist rate ???

The 90 gr Ballistic Tip is a long bullet and I can't see it being very accurate in a 10" twist.
A 9.25" twist or faster would be more optimal for this bullet.


My Winchester 10 twist would not shoot accurately withe the Nosler 90 BT. Moved to a Remington in a 9.25 and it grouped up nicely.

DJ

DJ's Brass Service
205-461-4680
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,918
Messages
2,186,661
Members
78,591
Latest member
Danpsl
Back
Top