Bradley,
I agree - I used mostly LC with headstamps from 94 to 00 in my AR15 service & match rifles for years, and compared it to R-P, WW, IMI, & some Lapua 223 with Dakota headstamp out to 600, and even out to 1000yds later on in bolt rifles. Given the same prep & sorting criteria, I'm quite certain that LC 5.56 is fully as good as, if not better than, any of the commercial stuff I've had. The caseheads are sure tougher than the stuff that R-P put out in that time period.
I did some neck turning on some of the LC & WW brass I used for 600-1000yd loads, and found that I could leave the cutter set the same for both brands when taking a light clean-up cut. That setting resulted in about the same amount of brass shaved off necks of either brand.
Only thing I'm not sure about is whether the quality of LC is the same since WW lost the contract to operate Lake City. Anyone have an opinion on that?
I agree - I used mostly LC with headstamps from 94 to 00 in my AR15 service & match rifles for years, and compared it to R-P, WW, IMI, & some Lapua 223 with Dakota headstamp out to 600, and even out to 1000yds later on in bolt rifles. Given the same prep & sorting criteria, I'm quite certain that LC 5.56 is fully as good as, if not better than, any of the commercial stuff I've had. The caseheads are sure tougher than the stuff that R-P put out in that time period.
I did some neck turning on some of the LC & WW brass I used for 600-1000yd loads, and found that I could leave the cutter set the same for both brands when taking a light clean-up cut. That setting resulted in about the same amount of brass shaved off necks of either brand.
Only thing I'm not sure about is whether the quality of LC is the same since WW lost the contract to operate Lake City. Anyone have an opinion on that?