You said in your post before that the bullet was way out of the case @ 2.450. Now you are saying that the bullet is in the case "a calibre deep". If there is that much bullet in the neck and you can find the lands the chamber is fine.
He means that the ELDM is longer in the bearing surface than the SMK and when both are loaded to the same base to ogive length, the ELDM will be deeper in the case. If you do not want to encroach on your powder space, the throat needs to be longer to accomodate the longer bullet or you run the risk of the bearing surface being lower than the shoulder/neck junction and donuts starting to form which will effect seating and consistency.Would you guys check me on something?
In one of the OP's posts he says: "ELD‘s go further in the case than the SMK’s with both having bearing surface in the case".
I took that to mean that there is no bearing surface that's outside of the case neck.
That didn't compute for me. Hence the question about which chamber and then my example of the SMK being able to be loaded long enough so there's lots of bearing surface outside of the case.
Does that compute?
Thanks
I also took that statement to mean that at the seating depth the OP chose to compare the two bullets, both exhibited bearing surface below the neck/shoulder junction; i.e. "in the case". How that seating depth was chosen (by COAL, having both bullets seated at "touching", etc.) is not clear, but from the way it was worded, my guess would be that the freebore of the rifle may not be sufficiently long to seat either bullet with the boattail/bearing surface junction above the neck/shoulder junction. However, that's only my interpretation.Would you guys check me on something?
In one of the OP's posts he says: "ELD‘s go further in the case than the SMK’s with both having bearing surface in the case".
I took that to mean that there is no bearing surface that's outside of the case neck.
That didn't compute for me. Hence the question about which chamber and then my example of the SMK being able to be loaded long enough so there's lots of bearing surface outside of the case.
Does that compute?
Thanks
Hope this clears up what I was asking which basically a general consensus of weather ELD’s seam to prefer jam or jump
thanks hope somewhat clears up my post
They like to jump and can jump far and still be very accurate.
What powder do you run with your 75 eld in the wylde ? ThanksWith the ELD-M, like the AMAX before it, they don't need to be jammed into the lands in any calibers. I usually start .020" off the lands and rarely move. My 75 ELD-M load is at .020" off in my Wylde chamber and shoots great. You can jump them further also. I have some other ELDs that jump .090 and also very accurate so don't think they need to be jammed into the lands like some other bullets to be accurate.
I have used Varget and 8208.What powder do you run with your 75 eld in the wylde ? Thanks
Appreciate it much. ThanksI have used Varget and 8208.
H75Amax - similar profile to 75 ELDM 0.090” off in a Wylde chambered 26” bolt rifle.So... I've been following along, as I recently came across a pretty good deal on a Shilen 26" heavy Palma pre-fit (plus NSS barrel nut & wrench) that someone had gotten as part of a build that never happened. They'd sent in some dummy rounds (which I also have) to have it throated for H80ELDMs @ ~2.6" coal.
I do have a few 80ELDMs floating around in my stash, but what I have a bunch of is a couple thousand H75ELDMs. Seating them to the lands is possible... just barely... but I wouldn't want to mag-feed that load. So I've got them set back 50 thou, and that seems to be working okay so far - I've had to sort out some other things in my loading process after a bit of a hiatusso I can't really say I've got them anywhere near dialed in yet.
I'm curious how much jump you've used them with and still gotten acceptable results?
H75Amax - similar profile to 75 ELDM 0.090” off in a Wylde chambered 26” bolt rifle
On my 223AI, I had to go all the way out to 2.420 COAL to get the75 ELD to shoot but the chamber is a little long on that rifle. I would try .010 off and single load them in the chamber if you have to, just to see if that is the issue.Very nice. I've been poking away at this barrel; so far the (somewhat arbitrary) 50 thou jump hasn't shown me anything too exciting. Probably going to do some seating depth tests here in a week or so when I get more time. I can only go 'in' so far and keep them in the magazine, even with it modified for longer COAL. I'll probably check 40 and 30 thou jump, and then start working back 'out' away from the lands.
all the way out to 2.420 COAL
I am suggesting single loading as a test, but I think I just found your problemIn this chamber, 'all the way out' is more like 2.6" (2.593" to 'jam' with the Hornady comparator)
Which strains the capacity even of a modified AICS magazine... and this is not a gun for single-loading.